Including Pupils with Special Educational Needs and Disability in National Assessment: Comparison of Three Country Case Studies through an Inclusive Assessment Framework

References

• Altman, J. R., Lazarus, S. S., Quenemoen, R. F., Kearns, J., Quenemoen, M., & Thurlow, M. L. (2010). 2009 survey of states: Accomplishments and new issues at the end of a decade of change. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved from www.cehd.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/2009StateSurvey.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American Foundation of the Blind (AFB). (2009, May). Letter to Sec. of Education: Estimates of severely visually impaired children. Retrieved from http://www.afb.org/Section.asp?SectionID=3&TopicID=138&DocumentID=4756
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J., & McCoy, S. (2011). A study on the prevalence of special educational needs. Trim: National Council for Special Educational Needs.
   Google Scholar
• Cameto, R., & Nagle, K. (2007). Facts from NLTS2: Orientation and mobility skills of secondary school students with visual impairments. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/fact_sheets/nlts2_fact_sheet_2007_11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cameto, R., Knokey, A.-M., Nagle, K., Sanford, C., Blackorby, J., Sinclair, B., … Lauer, K. (2009). State profiles on alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards: A report from the National Study on Alternate Assessments, NCSER 2009-3013. National Center for Special Education Research. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncser/
   Google Scholar
• Cole, C. (2006). Closing the achievement gap series: Part III. What is the impact of NCLB on the inclusion of students with disabilities? (Vol. 4, No. 11). Center for Evaluation and Education Policy. Retrieved from http://www.ceep.indiana.edu/projects/PDF/PB_V4N11_Fall_2006_NCLB_dis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, J., McKeown, C., Travers, J., Lysaght, Z., NíBhroin, O., & Archer, P. (2014). Educational experiences and outcomes for children with special educational needs: A secondary analysis of data from the growing up in Ireland study ( NCSE Research Report No. 17). Trim: National Council for Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Race, inequality and educational accountability: The irony of “no child left behind”. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 10, 245–260.10.1080/13613320701503207
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). (2010). Children with special educational needs 2010: An analysis. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). (2011). Children with special educational needs 2011: An analysis. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES). (2011). Literacy and numeracy for learning and life, the national strategy to improve literacy and numeracy among children and young people 2011–2020. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES). (2014). Revised arrangements for the submission of returns to the department of education and skills by post-primary schools for 2014/15 and future years (Circular Letter 38/2014). Retrieved from http://www.education.ie/en/Circulars-and-Forms/Active-Circulars/cl0038_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, G., Travers, J., McLinden, M., Robertson, C., Smith, E., Macnab, N., Lacey, P. (2012). Measuring educational engagement, progress and outcomes for children with special educational needs: A review. Trim: National Council for Special Education (NCSE). Retrieved from http://ncse.ie/research-reports
   Google Scholar
• Eivers, E., Close, S., Sheil, G., Millar, D., Clerkin, A., Gilleece, L., & Kiniry, J. (2010). The 2009 national assessments of Mathematics and English reading. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. N., Kettler, R. J., & Roach, A. T. (2008). Alternate assessments of modified achievement standards: More accessible and less difficult tests to advance assessment practices? Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 19, 140–152. doi:10.1177/1044207308327472
   Google Scholar
• European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education (EADSNE). (2010). Special needs education Country data 2010. Odense: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Florian, L., Rouse, M., Black-Hawkins, K., & Jull, S. (2004). What can national data sets tell us about inclusion and pupil achievement? British Journal of Special Education, 31, 115–121. doi:10.1111/j.0952-3383.2004.00341.x
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M., & Macbeath, J. (2015). Inclusion: Statements of intent—A report to the National Union of Teachers on the current state of special educational needs and disability provision. National Union of Teachers. Retrieved from https://www.teachers.org.uk/files/inclusion-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Geenen, K., & Ysseldyke, J. (1997). Educational standards and students with disabilities. The Educational Forum, 61, 220–229.10.1080/00131729709335259
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S. (2010). Serious doubts about school effectiveness. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 745–766. doi:10.1080/01411920903144251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper, M. F. (2001). The implications of accommodations in testing disabled students. Eric No. ED463627. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED463627
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, N., & Squires, G. (2010). Achievement for all evaluation: Interim report. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, N., & Squires, G. (2011). Achievement for all: National evaluation. Final report. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, T. (2010). Educational assessment in England. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 17, 315–334. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.491787
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, S., Straw, S., Jones, M., Springate, I., & Grayson, H. (2008). A review of the research evidence (narrowing the gap in outcomes for vulnerable groups). Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriazopoulou, M., & Weber, H. (2009). Development of a set of indicators for inclusive education in Europe. Odense: European Agency for the Development of Special Needs Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, S. S., Thurlow, M. L., Lail, K. E., & Christensen, L. (2009). A longitudinal analysis of state accommodations policies: Twelve Years of change, 1993–2005. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 67–80.10.1177/0022466907313524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowrey, K. A., Drasgow, E., Renzaglia, A., & Chezan, L. (2007). Impact of alternate assessment on curricula for students with severe disabilities: Purpose driven or process driven? Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 244–253. doi:10.1177/15345084070320040601
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, L. A. & Shah, N. (2011). Often excluded, more special-needs students taking NAEP. Education Week, 31. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2011/11/15/12exclusion.h31.html10.4135/9781412994194
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. J., & Thurlow, M. (2003). Educational accountability and students with disabilities: Issues and challenges. Educational Policy, 17, 431–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M., Rutt, S., Kendall, L., & Mehta, P. (2008). Overview and analysis of available datasets on vulnerable groups and the five ECM outcomes (narrowing the gap in outcomes for vulnerable groups). Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2011). Digest of educational statistics 2010, chapter 2: Elementary and secondary education, NCES. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/ch_2.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA). (2011). Towards a framework for junior cycle. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council on Disability (NCD). (2008). The no child left behind act and the individuals with disabilities education act: A progress report, national council on disability. Retrieved from http://www.educationalpolicy.org/publications/pubpdf/NCD_2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Dissemination Centre for Children with Disabilities. (2011). IDEA Part B indicators. Retrieved from http://nichcy.org/laws/idea#indicators
   Google Scholar
• Ndaji, F., & Tymms, P. (2009). The P scales: Assessing the progress of children with special educational needs. London: Wiley.10.1002/9780470682227
   Google Scholar
• Ndaji, F., & Tymms, P. (2010). The P scales: How well are they working? British Journal of Special Education, 37, 198–208. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8578.2010.00481.x
   Google Scholar
• Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R. & Knokey, A.-M. (2009). The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A report from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2). NCSER 2009-3017. National Center for Special Education Research. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncser/
   Google Scholar
• Norwich, B. (2008). Dilemmas of difference, inclusion and disability. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norwich, B. (2013). Addressing tensions and dilemmas in inclusive education: Living with uncertainty. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). (2007). Assessment for disabled students: An international comparison: QCA briefing document. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). (2009a). Using the P scales: Assessing, moderating and reporting pupil attainment at levels P1 to P8. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). (2009b). The P scales: Level descriptors P1 to P8. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Qualifications and Curriculum Development Agency (QCDA). (2011). Using the P scales to assess pupils’ progress. Coventry: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, C., Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Knokey, A.-M., & Shaver, D. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 6 years after high school. Key findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) ( NCSER 2011-3004). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/
   Google Scholar
• Sheil, G., Kellagham, T., & Moran, G. (2010). Standardised testing in lower secondary education. Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Shiel, G., Kavanagh, L., & Millar, D. (2014). The 2014 national assessments of reading and mathematics. Performance report. Dublin: Educational Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Levine, P., & Marder, C. (2007). Perceptions and expectations of youth with disabilities. A special topic report of findings from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/10.1037/e608012011-001
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, A. (2007). Assessment in inclusive settings: Key issues for policy and practice. Odense: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., Greene, S., Doyle, E., Harris, E., Layte, R., McCoy, S., … Thornton, M. (2009). Growing up in Ireland national longitudinal study of children: The lives of 9-year-olds. Dublin: Office of the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs.
   Google Scholar