Divergent Thinking in Italian Students with and Without Reading Impairments

References

• American Psychology Association. (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychology Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Angelelli, P., Notarnicola, A., Judica, A., Zoccolotti, P., & Luzzatti, C. (2010). Spelling impairments in Italian dyslexic children: Phenomenological changes in primary school. Cortex, 46, 1299–1311. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.06.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonietti, A., & Cornoldi, C. (2006). Creativity in Italy. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The international handbook of creativity (pp. 124–166). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511818240
   Google Scholar
• Barbiero, C., Lonciari, I., Montico, M., Monasta, L., Penge, R., Vio, C., … Ronfani, L. (2012). The submerged dyslexia iceberg: How many school children are not diagnosed? Results from an Italian study. Plos One, 7, e48082.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, L., Burani, C., Di Filippo, G., & Zoccolotti, P. (2006). Italian developmental dyslexic and proficient readers: Where are the differences? Brain and Language, 98, 347–351. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2005). Does assessment kill student creativity? The Educational Forum, 69, 254–263.10.1080/00131720508984694
   Google Scholar
• Berti, A. E., & Freeman, N. H. (1997). Representational change in sources for pictorial innovation: A three-component analysis. Cognitive Development, 12, 510–522.
   Google Scholar
• Büttner, G., & Hasselhorn, M. (2011). Learning disabilities: Debates on definitions, causes, subtypes, and responses. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 58, 75–87. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2011.548476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. W., Ho, C. S.-H., Chung, K. K. H., Tsang, S.-M., & Lee, S.-H. (2012). The Hong Kong behaviour checklist for primary students: Developing a brief dyslexia screening measure. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 53, 173–196. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2012.676437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claxton, A. F., Pannells, T. C., & Rhoads, P. A. (2005). Developmental trends in the creativity of school-age children. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 327–335. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1704_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockcroft, K., & Hartgill, M. (2004). Focusing on the abilities in learning disabilities: Dyslexia and creativity. Education as Change, 8, 61–79. doi:10.1080/16823200409487081
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Çorlu, M., Özcan, O., & Korkmazlar, Ü. (2009). The meaning of dyslexic’s drawings in communication design. Dyslexia, 15, 147–154. doi:10.1002/dys.362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornoldi, C., Colpo, G., & MT Group (1998). Prove di lettura MT per la scuola elementare-2 [MT reading tests for primary school]. Florence, IT: Organizzazioni Speciali.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2006). A systems perspective on creativity. In J. Henry (Ed.), Creative management and development creative management and development (pp. 3–17). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446213704
   Google Scholar
• Everatt, J., Steffert, B., & Smythe, I. (1999). An eye for the unusual: Creative thinking in dyslexics. Dyslexia, 5, 28–46. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0909(199903)5:1<28:AID-YS126>3.0.CO;2-K
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Helmuth, L. (2011). Dyslexia: Same brains, different languages. Science, 291, 2064–2065. doi:10.1126/science.291.5511.2064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinshelwood, J. (1909). Four cases of congenital word-blindness occurring in the same family. British Medical Journal, 2, 1229–1232.
   Google Scholar
• LaFrance, E. (1997). The gifted/dyslexic child: Characterizing and addressing strengths and weaknesses. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 163–182. doi:10.1007/s11881-997-0025-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorusso, M. L., Vernice, M., Dieterich, M., Brizzolara, D., Mariani, E., & Al, E. (2014). The process and criteria for diagnosing specific learning disorders: Indications from the Consensus Conference promoted by the Italian National Institute of Health. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 50, 77–89. doi:10.4415/ANN_14_01_12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouchiroud, C., & Lubart, T. (2001). Children’s original thinking: An empirical examination of alternative measures derived from divergent thinking tasks. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162, 382–401. doi:10.1080/00221320109597491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muter, V., & Snowling, M. J. (2009). Children at familial risk of dyslexia: Practical implications from an at-risk study. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 14, 37–41. doi:10.1111/j.1475-3588.2007.00480.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakano, T. C., Wechsler, S. M., & Primi, R. (2011). Teste de criatividade figural infantil: Manual técnico. [Test of Child's Figural Creativity: Instructions Manual]. São Paulo, SP: Vetor.
   Google Scholar
• Nogueira, S. M. (2006). MORCEGOS: A Portuguese enrichment program of creativity pilot study with gifted students and students with learning difficulties. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 45–54. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1801_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsolini, M., Fanari, R., Tosi, V., De Nigris, B., & Carrieri, R. (2006). From phonological recoding to lexical reading: A longitudinal study on reading development in Italian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 576–607. doi:10.1080/01690960500139355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulesu, E., Démonet, J. F., Fazio, F., McCrory, E., Chanoine, V., Brunswick, N., … Frith, U. (2001). Dyslexia: Cultural diversity and biological unity. Science, 291, 2165–2167. doi:10.1126/science.1057179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35–61). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rauni, R. J. R., & Nakano, T. (2014). Creativity and intelligence in children with and without developmental dyslexia. Paidéia, 24, 361–369. doi:10.1590/1982-43272459201410
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, S. J., Luciano, M., Hansell, N. K., Wright, M. J., & Bates, T. C. (2013). The relationship of reading ability to creativity: Positive, not negative associations. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 171–176. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. (2008). Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 93–96. doi:10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.93
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66–75. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, S. P., & Deutsch, G. (1997). Left brain, right brain: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Tafti, M. A., Hameedy, M. A., & Baghal, N. M. (2009). Dyslexia, a deficit or a difference: Comparing the creativity and memory skills of dyslexic and nondyslexic students in Iran. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 37, 1009–1016. doi:10.2224/sbp.2009.37.8.1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarver, S. G., Ellsworth, P. S., & Rounds, D. J. (1980). Figural and verbal creativity in learning disabled and nondisabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 11–18. doi:10.2307/1510626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Lexington, MA: Ginn & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1990). Norms-technical Manual: Figural Streamlined Forms A & B, TTCT. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Tressoldi, P., Stella, G., & Faggella, M. (2001). The development of reading speed in Italians with dyslexia: A longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 414–417. doi:10.1177/002221940103400503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., & Fletcher, J. M. (2005). Developmental dyslexia. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 362–378). Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470757642
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40. doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villani, D., & Antonietti, A. (2012). Measurements of creativity. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 1234–1238). Heidelberg, DE: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, F. (1980). Creativity assessment packet. Buffalo, NY: DOK.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, F. (1993). Creativity assessment packet. Austin, TX: PRO-ED (It. Trans. TCD: Test della creatività e del pensiero divergente. Trento, Italy: Erickson, 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E., von Karolyi, C., Malinsky, D., French, L., Seliger, C., Ross, E., & Weber, C. (2001). Dyslexia and visual-spatial talents: Compensation vs. deficit model. Brain and Language, 76, 81–110. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, U., & Lundberg, I. (2002). The prevalence of dyslexia among art students. Dyslexia, 8, 34–42. doi:10.1002/dys.211
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2010). Specific reading disorder. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2010/en#/F81.0
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., … Blomert, L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21, 551–559. doi:10.1177/0956797610363406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Ma-Wyatt, A., Ladner, D., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2003). Developmental dyslexia in different languages: Language-specific or universal? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 169–193. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00139-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakopoulou, V., Anagnostopoulou, A., Christodoulides, P., Stavrou, L., Sarri, I., Mavreas, V., & Tzoufi, M. (2011). An interpretative model of early indicators of specific developmental dyslexia in preschool age: A comparative presentation of three studies in Greece. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 3003–3016. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.03.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Judica, A., Orlandi, M., & Spinelli, D. (1999). Markers of developmental surface dyslexia in a language (Italian) with high grapheme-phoneme correspondence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 191–216. doi:10.1017/S0142716499002027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar