1,291
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Reading Comprehension Instruction for Students with Intellectual Disabilities:A Systematic Literature Review

, , , &

References

  • *Adediran, O. A., & Tolulope, E.O. J. (2013). Gender difference in treatment intervention of reading comprehension achievement of pupils with intellectual disability. Gender and Behaviour, 11(2), 5812–5818.
  • *Alberto, P. A., Waugh, R. E., & Fredrick, L. D. (2010). Teaching the reading of connected text through sight-word instruction to students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(6), 1467–1474.
  • *Alfassi, M., Weiss, I., & Lifshitz, H. (2009). The efficacy of reciprocal teaching in fostering the reading literacy of students with intellectual disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24(3), 291–305.
  • *Allor, J. H., Mathes, P. G., Roberts, J. K., Cheatham, J. P., & Champlin, T. M. (2010). Comprehensive reading instruction for students with intellectual disabilities: Findings from the first three years of a longitudinal study. Psychology in the Schools, 47(5), 445–466.
  • *Allor, J. H., Mathes, P. G., Roberts, J. K., Jones, F. G., & Champlin, T. M. (2010). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disabilities to read: An experimental examination of a comprehensive reading intervention. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(1), 3–22.
  • American Psychiatric Association [APA]. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed. ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Baker, D. W. (2006). The meaning and the measure of health literacy. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(8), 878–883.
  • Boyle, J. R. (2001). The effects of a venn diagram strategy on the literal, inferential, and relational comprehension of students with mild disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 5–13.
  • *Browder, D. M., Hudson, M. E., & Wood, A. L. (2013). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disability who are emergent readers to comprehend passages of text. Exceptionality, 21(4), 191–206.
  • Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y., Spooner, F., Ahlbrim-Delzell, L., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 392–408.
  • Caccamise, D., & Snyder, L. (2005). Theory and pedagogical practices of text comprehension. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(1), 5–20.
  • Catts, H. W. (2018). The simple view of reading: Achievements and false impressions. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 317–323.
  • Chiu, Y. D., & Cain, K. (2018). The simple view of reading across development: Prediction of grade 3 reading comprehension from prekindergarten skills. Remedial & Special Education, 39(5), 289–303.
  • *Cohen, D., Plaza, M., Perez-Diaz, F., Lanthier, O., Chauvin, D., Hambourg, & Rivière, J. P. (2006). Individual cognitive training of reading disability improves word identification and sentence comprehension in adults with mild mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27(5), 501–516.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Courtade, G. R., Gurney, B. N., & Carden, R. (2017). Using read-alouds of grade-level social studies text and systematic prompting to promote comprehension for students with severe disabilities. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 41(4), 291–301.
  • *Coyne, P., Pisha, B., Dalton, B., Zeph, L. A., & Smith, N. C. (2012). Literacy by design: A universal design for learning approach for students with significant intellectual disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33(3), 162–172.
  • Davis, M. H., & Gurthie, J. T. (2015). Measuring reading comprehension of content area texts using an assessment of knowledge organization. Journal of Educational Research, 108(2), 148–164.
  • Dickens, R. H., & Meisinger, E. B. (2017). Examining the effects of reading modality and passage genre on reading comprehension in middle school students. Reading Psychology, 38(3), 321–347.
  • Elleman, A. M. (2017). Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less skilled readers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 761–781.
  • Erickson, K., Hanser, G., Hatch, P., & Sanders, E. (2009). Research-based practices for creating access to the general curriculum in reading and literacy for students with significant intellectual disabilities. Retrieved from http://idahotc.com/Portals/15/Docs/IAA/10-11%20Docs/Research_Based_Practices_Reading_2009.pdf
  • *Flores, M. M., & Ganz, J. B. (2007). Effectiveness of direct instruction for teaching statement inference, use of facts, and analogies to students with developmental disabilities and reading delays. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22(4), 244–251.
  • *Flores, M. M., & Ganz, J. B. (2009). Effects of direct instruction on the reading comprehension of students with autism and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44(1), 39–53.
  • Francis, D. J., Kulesz, P. A., & Benoit, J. S. (2018). Extending the simple view of reading to account for variation within readers and across texts: The complete view of reading(CVRi). Remedial & Special Education, 39(5), 274–288.
  • Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279–320.
  • Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.
  • *Guler, O., & Ozmen, R. G. (2010). Using the brief experimental analysis to determine the effective reading comprehension strategy in story comprehension of students with mental retardation. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(3), 930–954.
  • Hall, C. S. (2016). Inference instruction for struggling readers: A synthesis of intervention research. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 1–22.
  • *Hua, Y., Ford, J. W., Yuan, C., Monroe, K., & Therrien, W. J. (2016). Implementing the reread-adapt and answer-comprehend intervention and reinforcement contingency for learners with intellectual disability. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 15(1), 110–132.
  • *Hua, Y., Hendrickson, J. M., Therrien, W. J., Woods-Groves, S., Ries, P. S., & Shaw, J. J. (2012). Effects of combined reading and question generation on reading fluency and comprehension of three young adults with autism and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27(3), 135–146.
  • *Hua, Y., Therrien, W. J., Hendrickson, J. M., Woods-Groves, S., Ries, P. S., & Shaw, J. W. (2012). Effects of combined repeated reading and question generation intervention on young adults with cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(1), 72–83.
  • *Hua, Y., Woods-Groves, S., Ford, J. W., & Nobles, K. A. (2014). Effects of the paraphrasing strategy on expository reading comprehension of young adults with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(3), 429–439.
  • *Hua, Y., Woods-Groves, S., Kaldenberg, E. R., & Scheidecker, B. J. (2013). Effects of individuals with disabilities education improvement act [IDEIA], 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).vocabulary instruction using constant time delay on expository reading of young adults with intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28(2), 89–100.
  • *Isikdogan, N., & Kargin, T. (2010). Investigation of the effectiveness of the story-map method on reading comprehension skills among students with mental retardation. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(3), 1509–1527.
  • Kim, W., Linan‐Thompson, S., & Misquitta, R. (2012). Critical factors in reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities: A research synthesis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(2), 66–78.
  • Klubnick, C., & Ardoin, S. P. (2010). Examining immediate and maintenance effects of a reading intervention package on generalization materials: Individual versus group implementation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19, 9–29.
  • *Lundberg, I., & Reichenberg, M. (2013). Developing reading comprehension among students with mild intellectual disabilities: An intervention study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(1), 89–100.
  • Minarovic, T. J., & Bambara, L. M. (2007). Teaching employees with intellectual disabilities to manage changing work routines using varied sight-word checklists. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32(1), 31–42.
  • National Reading Panel [NRP]. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
  • National Reading Technical Assistance Center. (2010). A review of the current research on comprehension instruction. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/readingfirst/support/compfinal.pdf
  • Osborn, J., Freeman, A., Burley, M., Wilson, R., Jones, E., & Rychener, S. (2007). Effect of tutoring on reading achievement for students with cognitive disabilities, specific learning disabilities, and students receiving Title I services. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42(4), 467–474.
  • *Ozmen, R. G. (2011). Comparison of two different presentations of graphic organizers in recalling information in expository texts with intellectually disabled students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(2), 785–793.
  • Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299.
  • Rakap, S. (2015). Effect sizes as result interpretation aids in single-subject experimental research: Description and application of four nonoverlap methods. British Journal of Special Education, 42(1), 11–33.
  • Randi, J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Revisiting definitions of readingcomprehension: Just what is reading comprehension anyway? In. In S. E. Israel, C. C. Block, K. L. Bauserman, & K. Kinnucan-Welsch Eds., Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, instruction, and professional development (19–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the systematic review.
  • Schalock, R. L., Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Bradley, V. J., Buntinx, W. H., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M.& Shogren, K. A. (2010). Intellectual disability:Definition, classification, and systems of supports. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Washington, DC.
  • Seung, H.-K., & Chapman, R. S. (2003). The effect of story presentations rates on story retelling by individuals with down syndrome. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(4), 603–620.
  • *Smith, B. R., Spooner, F., Jimenez, B. A., & Browder, D. (2013). Using an early science curriculum to teach science vocabulary and concepts to students with severe developmental disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children, 36(1), 1–31.
  • Spencer, M., Gilmour, A. F., Miller, A. C., Emerson, A. M., Saha, N. M., & Cutting, L. E. (2019). Understanding the influence of text complexity and question type on reading outcomes. Reading and Writing, 32(3), 603–637.
  • *Spooner, F., Rivera, C. J., Browder, D. M., Baker, J. N., & Salas, S. (2009). Teaching emergent literacy skills using cultural contextual story-based lessons. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 34(3–4), 102–112.
  • Swanson, E., Hairrell, A., Kent, S., Ciullo, S., Wanzek, J. A., & Vaughn, S. (2014). A synthesis and meta-analysis of reading interventions using social studies content for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 178–195.
  • *van Den Bos, K. P., Nakken, H., Nicolay, P. G., & Van Houten, E. J. (2007). Adults with mild intellectual disabilities: Can their reading comprehension ability be improved? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51(11), 835–849.
  • van Wingerden, E., Segers, E., van Balkom, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2014). Cognitive and, linguistic predictors of reading comprehension in children with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(11), 3139–3147. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.054.
  • Van Wingerden, E., Segers, E., Van Balkom, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Foundations of reading comprehension in children with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 60, 211–222.
  • Van Wingerden, E., Segers, E., Van Balkom, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2018). Cognitive constraints on the simple view of reading: A longitudinal study in children with intellectual disabilities. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(4), 321–334.
  • Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Kouzekanani, K., Bryant, D. P., Dickson, S., & Blozis, S. A. (2003). Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial & Special Education, 24(5), 301–315.
  • Woolley, G. (2011). Reading comprehension: Assisting children with learning difficulties. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springe.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.