Legitimising male grooming through packaging discourse: a linguistic analysis

References

• 2010. Sustainable Packaging. Sustainability Factsheet. http://sustainabledevelopment09.loreal.com/pdf/topics/Packaging.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Akcay, Okan, and Qian (Susan) Sun. 2013. “Cross-cultural Analysis of Gender Difference in Product Color Choice in Global Markets.” Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies 7: 158–170.
   Google Scholar
• Akcay, Okan, Muhammed H. Dalgin, and Swati Bhatnagar. 2011. “Perception of Color in Product Choice among College Students: A Cross-national Analysis of USA.” International Journal of Business and Social Science 2 (21): 42–48.
   Google Scholar
• Alreck, Pamela L. 1994. “Commentary: A New Formula for Gendering Products and Brands.” Journal of Product & Brand Management 3 (1): 6–18. doi:10.1108/10610429410053059.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, Kristen. 2008. “The Well-coiffed Man: Class, Race, and Heterosexual Masculinity in the Hair Salon.” Gender & Society 22 (4): 455–476. doi:10.1177/0891243208321168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carniel, Jessica. 2009. “Sheilas, Wogs and Metrosexuals: Masculinity, Ethnicity and Australian Soccer.” Soccer & Society 10 (1): 73–83. doi:10.1080/14660970802472676.
   Google Scholar
• Chand, Piar, and Shivani Chaudhary. 2012. “Advertising Discourse: Studying Creation and Perception of Meaning.” International Journal of English and Literature 3 (2): 40–49. doi:10.5897/IJEL11.070.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, Daniel. 2007. Semiotics: The Basics. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Fan Shean, Cheng Soon Ooi, and Ding Hooi Ting. 2010. “Factors Affecting Consumption Behavior of Metrosexual toward Male Grooming Products.” International Review of Business Research Papers 6 (1): 574–590.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Namok, Dale R. Fuqua, and Jody L. Newman. 2009. “Exploratory and Confirmatory Studies of the Structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory Short Form with Two Divergent Samples.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 69 (4): 696–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupland, Justine. 2007. “Gendered Discourses on the ‘Problem’ of Ageing: Consumerized Solutions.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 37–61. doi:10.1177/1750481307071984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djonov, Emilia, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2011. “The Semiotics of Texture: From Tactile to Visual.” Visual Communication 10 (4): 541–564. doi:10.1177/1470357211415786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, Becky. 2010. “Gender, Toys and Learning.” Oxford Review of Education 36 (3): 325–344. doi:10.1080/03054981003732278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grohmann, Bianca. 2009. “Gender Dimensions of Brand Personality.” Journal of Marketing Research 46 (1): 105–119. doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.1.105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grohmann, Bianca, Joan L. Giese, and Ian D. Parkman. 2012. “Using Type Font Characteristics to Communicate Brand Personality of New Brands.” Journal of Brand Management 20 (5): 389–403. doi:10.1057/bm.2012.23.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Matthew, Brendan Gough, and Sarah Seymour-Smith. 2012. “‘I’m METRO, NOT Gay!’: A Discursive Analysis of Men’s Accounts of Makeup Use on YouTube.” The Journal of Men’s Studies 20 (3): 209–226.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Claire. 2008. “Real Men Do Wear Mascara: Advertising Discourse and Masculine Identity.” Critical Discourse Studies 5 (1): 55–73. doi:10.1080/17405900701768638.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, Jack S. 2009. An Introduction to Masculinities. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2002. “Colour as a Semiotic Mode: Notes for a Grammar of Colour.” Visual Communication 1 (3): 343–368. doi:10.1177/147035720200100306.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Labrecque, Lauren I., and George R. Milne. 2012. “Exciting Red and Competent Blue: The Importance of Color in Marketing.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40 (5): 711–727. doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0245-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lertwannawit, Aurathai, and Nak Gulid. 2010. “Metrosexual Identification: Gender Identity and Beauty-related Behaviors.” International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER) 9 (11): 85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Market Research Report. 2012–2013. Accessed March 10, from Companies and Market.com. http://www.companiesandmarkets.com/Market/Static/RelatedReports?code=RPT907476&sector=Consumer-Goods&type=Market-Research&page=3.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, Magdalena Petersson. 2011. “The Gendered Bottle: Meaning-making in Luxury Packaging.” In Current Issues in European Cultural Studies, 343–353. Norrköping: Linköping University Electronic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, Lisa S., and Katie Douglas. 2011. “Retailing Masculinity: Gender Expectations and Social Image of Male Grooming Products in New Zealand.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 18 (5): 448–454. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.06.009.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, Gloria. 2009. Gender, Design and Marketing: How Gender Drives Our Perception of Design and Marketing. Surrey: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Nørgaard, Nina. 2009. “The Semiotics of Typography in Literary Texts: A Multimodal Approach.” Orbis Litterarum 64 (2): 141–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Sigrid, and Rodney Jones. 2005. “Discourse as Action/discourse in Action.” In Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis, edited by Sigrid Norris and Rodney Jones, 3–14. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Ourahmoune, Nacima. 2009. “Intimacy-related Male Consumption and Masculine Identity Construction: A Consumer Point of View.” Advances in Consumer Research 8: 130–136.
   Google Scholar
• Pantin-Sohier, Gaëlle. 2009. “The Influence of the Product Package on Functional and Symbolic Associations of Brand Image.” Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) 24: 53–71. doi:10.1177/205157070902400203.
   Google Scholar
• Pompper, Donnalyn. 2010. “Masculinities, the Metrosexual, and Media Images: Across Dimensions of Age and Ethnicity.” Sex Roles 63 (9–10): 682–696. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9870-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritnamkam, Siripuk, and Nopadon Sahachaisaeree. 2012. “Cosmetic Packaging Design: A Case Study on Gender Distinction.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 50: 1018–1032. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.102.
   Google Scholar
• Rossolatos, George. 2012. “Applying Structuralist Semiotics to Brand Image Research.” The Public Journal of Semiotics 4 (1): 25–82.
   Google Scholar
• Sable, Paul, and Okan Akcay. 2010. “Color: Cross Cultural Marketing Perspectives as to What Governs Our Response to It.” In ASBBS Annual Conference, 950–954. Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Jonathan E., and Janet L. Borgerson. 1998. “Marketing Images of Gender: A Visual Analysis.” Consumption, Markets and Culture 2 (2): 161–201. doi:10.1080/10253866.1998.9670315.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Jonathan E. 2006. “23 Critical Visual Analysis.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Marketing, edited by Russell W. Belk, 303–321. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, Ron. 2001. Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shanmugam, Jaya Ranee. 2002. “Stereotypes in the Language of Beauty Product Advertisements.” Master diss., Faculty of Languages and Linguistics, University of Malaya.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, Meong Jin, Stephen Westland, Edel M. Moore, and Vien Cheung. 2012. “Colour Preferences for Traditional Korean Colours.” Journal of the International Colour Association 9: 48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, Mark. 1994/2013. “Here Come the Mirror Men.” In Metrosexy: A 21st Century Self-love Story, 2–4. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform. (originally published in the Independent).
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, Mark. 2002/2013. “Meet the Metrosexual.” In Metrosexy: A 21st Century Self-love Story, 5–19. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform. (originally published in the Salon magazine).
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland, Jane. 2004. “Discourse, Discourse Analysis and Gender.” In Gendered Discourses, edited by Jane Sunderland, 1–26. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, Mary. 2010. Language and Gender. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, Deborah. 1991. You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Ballantine.
   Google Scholar
• Tungate, Mark. 2008. Branded Male: Marketing to Men. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, Robert L., and Julie L. Ozanne. 1998. “Is Your Package an Effective Communicator? A Normative Framework for Increasing the Communicative Competence of Packaging.” Journal of Marketing Communications 4 (4): 207–220. doi:10.1080/135272698345762.
   Google Scholar
• Valdillez, Kyle. 2012. “Color and Brand Design for Multicultural Packaging.” Master’s diss., California Polytechnic State University.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2006. “Towards a Semiotics of Typography.” Information Design Journal + Document Design 14 (2): 139–155.
   Google Scholar
• Veg, Nathalie. 2007. “Brand Gender and Cross-gender Extensions.” Doctoral diss., Essec Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Vilnai-Yavetz, Iris, and Ran Koren. 2013. “Cutting through the Clutter: Purchase Intentions as a Function of Packaging Instrumentality, Aesthetics, and Symbolism.” The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 23 (4): 394–417. doi:10.1080/09593969.2013.792743.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Naomi. 2002. The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used against Women. New York: Perennia.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Julia T. 2012. Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender, & Culture. 10th ed. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar