1,085
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Identity construction of suspects in telecom and internet fraud discourse: from a sociosemiotic perspective

, &

References

  • Agar, M. 1985. “Institutional Discourse.” Text 5 (3): 147–168. doi: 10.1515/text.1.1985.5.3.147
  • Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. “Discourse in the Novel.” In The Dialogic Imagination, edited by Michael Holquist, 259–422. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Bakhtin, M. M. 1986. Speech Genres & Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Berger, P. L., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  • Bhatia, V. K. 1993. Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
  • Bhatia, V. K. 1995. “Genre-mixing and in Professional Communication: The Case of ‘Private Intentions’ v. ‘Socially Recognized Purposes’.” In Explorations in English for Professional Communication, edited by P. Bruthiaux, T. Boswood, and B. Bertha, 1–19. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
  • Bhatia, V. K. 1997. “Genre-Mixing in Academic Introductions.” English for Specific Purposes 16 (3): 181–196. doi: 10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00039-7
  • Bhatia, V. K. 2008. “Genre Analysis, ESP and Professional Practice.” English for Specific Purposes 27 (2): 161–174. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2007.07.005
  • Bhatia, V. K., and A. Bhatia. 2011. “Legal Discourse across Cultures and Socio-pragmatic Contexts.” World Englishes 30 (4): 481–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-971X.2011.01727.x
  • Blommaert, J., and T. Omoniyi. 2006. “E-mail Fraud: Language, Technology, and the Indexicals of Globalization.” Social Semiotics 16 (4): 573–605. doi: 10.1080/10350330601019942
  • Bohman, J. 1999. “Theories, Practices, and Pluralism: A Pragmatic Interpretation of Critical Social Science.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (4): 459–480. doi: 10.1177/004839319902900401
  • Burr, V. 2003. Social Constructionism, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
  • Chandler, D. 2002. Semiotics: The Basics. London: Routledge.
  • Cheng, Le. 2007. “Identification and Appraisal of Intergenericity in Judgments.” Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University 83 (2): 32–37.
  • Cheng, Le. 2010. “A Semiotic Interpretation of Genre: Court Judgments as an Example.” Semiotica 182: 89–113.
  • Cheng, Le, Shifeng Ni, K. K. Sin, and Winnie Cheng. 2012. “A Sociosemiotic Approach to Fundamental Rights in China.” Semiotica 190: 41–55.
  • Cheng, Le, and K. K. Sin. 2008. “A Court Judgment as Dialogue.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, edited by Edda Weigand, 267–281. Benjamins: Amsterdam.
  • Cheng, Le, and K. K. Sin. 2011. “A Sociosemiotic Interpretation of Linguistic Modality in Legal Settings.” Semiotica 185: 123–146.
  • Cobley, P., and A. Randviir. 2009. “Introduction: What is Sociosemiotics?” Semiotica 173: 1–39. doi: 10.1515/SEMI.2009.001
  • Coulthard, M., and A. Johnson. 2007. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge.
  • De Saussure, F. 1983. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. by R. Harris. London: Duckworth.
  • Drew, P., and J. Heritage. 1992. “Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction.” In Talk at Work, edited by P. Drew, and J. Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
  • Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysizing Discourse. New York: Routledge.
  • Fairclough, N. 2006. Language and Globalization. New York: Routledge.
  • Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punishment. London: Tavistock.
  • Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  • Habermas, J. 1998. On the Pragmatics of Communication, Edited by M. Cooke. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. [1985] 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Hasan, R. 1984. “The Nursery Tale as a Genre.” Nottingham Linguistic Circular 13: 71–102.
  • Hodge, R., and G. Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Huang, Huaxin, and Cihua Xu. 2003. “Semiotic Perspective on Cyberspace Interaction.” Studies in Dialectics of Nature 19 (1): 50–54.
  • Hyland, K. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interaction in Academic Writing. London: Longman.
  • Kristeva, J. 1986. The Kristeva Reader. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Li, Heng, and Mi Zhou. 2017. “Breaking the Stereotype – Reconstruction of Police Image in the Context of We-Media.” Journal of Beijing Police College 6: 58–63.
  • Martin, J. R. 1984. “Language, Register and Genre.” In Children Writing: Reader, edited by F. Christie, 984. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
  • Martin, J. R. 2000. “Beyond Exchange: APPRAISAL Systems in English.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, edited by S. Hunston, and G. Thompson, 142–175. Oxford: OUP.
  • Martin, J. R. 2009. “Genre and Language Learning: A Social Semiotic Perspective.” Linguistics and Education 20 (1): 10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.003
  • McKeller, G. B. 1987. “The Place of Socio-Semiotics in Contemporary Thought.” In Language Topics: Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday, edited by R. Steelle and T. Threadgold, 523–548. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Mey, J. L. 2017. “Discourse, Interests, and the Law: Some Pragma-Legal Reflections.” International Journal of Legal Discourse 2 (1): 13–28. doi: 10.1515/ijld-2017-0004
  • Peirce, C. S. 1998. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, 1893-1913. Ed. Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University.
  • Petrilli, S. 2016. “Justice, Fairness and Juridical Perfectibility.” International Journal of Legal Discourse 1 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1515/ijld-2016-0011
  • Sacks, H. 1963. “Sociological Description.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 8 (1): 1–16.
  • Sacks, H. 1995. Lectures on Conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Schegloff, E. A., Deirdre Boden, and D. Zimmerman. 1991. “Reflections on Talk and Social Structure.” In Talk and Social Structure, 44–70. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Thompson, G. 2012. “Intersubjectivity in Newspaper Editorials: Construing the Reader-in-the-Text.” English Text Construction 5 (1): 77–100. doi: 10.1075/etc.5.1.05tho
  • Thornborrow, J. 2002. Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. London: Longman. Pearson Education.
  • Van Leeuwen, T. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
  • Wagner, A., and L. Cheng. 2011. Exploring Courtroom Discourse: The Language of Power and Control. London: Ashgate/Routledge.
  • Wagner, Anne, Le Cheng, and Jixian Pang. 2012. “Nation, Identity and Multiculturalism: A Socio-Semiotic Perspective.” International Journal of Semiotic of Law 25 (2): 1–3. doi: 10.1007/s11196-011-9245-6
  • Ye, Ning, Jixian Pang, and Jian Li. 2014. “A Sociosemiotic Interpretation of Police Interrogations.” Semiotica 201 (1/4): 269–280.
  • Zhang, Huawei. 2017. “A Review of the Research on the Psychological Victims of Crime in China.” Journal of Zhejiang Police College 161 (3): 86–91.
  • Zhao, Yun. 2011. Mediation Practice and Skills. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.