Introducing writing (in) the city

References

• Aiello, G. this issue. “Communicating the ‘World-Class’ City: A Visual-Material Approach.” Social Semiotics 31 (1).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbican Centre. 2012. Bauhaus: Art as Life. London: Barbican Art Gallery and Koenig Books.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., and C. Lee. 2013. Language Online: Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, S., and J. Bloom, eds. 2017. By the Pen and What they Write: Writing in Islamic Art and Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, R. 1998. “Angels in the Archive: Lines into the Future in the Work of Jacques Derrida and Michel Serres.” In Time and Value, edited by S. Lash, A. Quick, and R. Roberts, 48–64. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Coulmas, F. 2009. “Linguistic Landscaping and the Seed of the Public Sphere.” In Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery, edited by E. Shohamy, and D. Gorter, 13–24. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coupland, N. in press. “Normativity, Language & Covid-19.” In Norms and the Study of Language in Social Life, edited by J. Mortensen and K. Kraft, 1–16. Berlin: De Gruyter. [Also published as N. Coupland. 2020. “Normativity, Language & Covid-19.” Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies 274.].
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2019. Maxwell Street: Writing and Thinking Place. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, J., G. Dahlberg, and C. F. Holtermann. 2004. Invisible Cities. Stockholm: Moderna Museet.
   Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by S. Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Originally published 1980].
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, J. 2010. “Species of Espaces and Other Spurious Concepts Addressed to Reading the Invisible Features of Signs within Systems of Relations.” Design and Culture 2 (2): 135–153.
   Google Scholar
• Eastmond, A., ed. 2015. Viewing Inscriptions in the Late Antique and Medieval World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. 2003 [1973]. “Function and Sign: The Semiotics of Architecture.” In Semiotics. Volume 3, edited by M. Gottdiener, K. Boklund-Lagopoulou, and A. Ph. Lagopoulou, 241–290. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Entrikin, J. N. 1991. The Betweenness of Place: Towards a Geography of Modernity. Houndsmill: Macmillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Finnegan, R. 1998. Tales of the City: A Study of Narrative and Urban Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, P. 1991. Making and Effacing Art: Modern American Art in a Culture of Museums. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. 1990. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. London: Falmer Press
   Google Scholar
• Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, K. 2019. “‘YO! or OY? – Say What? Creative Place-Making Through a Metrolingual Artifact in Dumbo, Brooklyn.” International Journal of Multilingualism 16 (1): 42–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, E., and A. Williams. 2002. City Literacies: Learning to Read Across Generations and Cultures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner, C. A. 2014. “Embedding Digital Literacies in English Language Teaching: Students’ Digital Video Projects as Multimodal Ensembles.” TESOL Quarterly 48 (4): 655–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R. 1996. Signs of Writing. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. 2005. Rethinking Writing. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2007. Lines: A Brief History. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Järlehed, J., H. Lykke Nielsen, and T. Rosendal. 2018. “Language, Food and Gentrification: Signs of Socioeconomic Mobility in Two Gothenburg Neighbourhoods.” Multilingual Margins 5 (1): 40–65.
   Google Scholar
• Järlehed, J. this issue. “Alphabet City: Orthographic Differentiation and Branding in Late Capitalist Cities.” Social Semiotics 31 (1).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski, A. 2019. “The Art of Silence in Upmarket Spaces of Commerce.” In Expanding the Linguistic Landscape: Linguistic Diversity, Multimodality and the Use of Space as a Semiotic Resource, edited by M. Pütz, and N. Mundt, 89–114. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, A. 2020. “Multimodal Writing: The Avant-Garde Assemblage and Other Minimal Texts.” International Journal of Multilingualism 17 (3): 336–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski, A., and J. J. Lou. this issue. “#wordswewear: Mobile Texts, Expressive Persons, and Conviviality in Urban Spaces.” Social Semiotics 31 (1).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski, A., and C. Thurlow, eds. 2010. Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, A., and S. Yeung. 2010. “Life in the Garden of Eden: The Naming and Imagery of Residential Hong Kong.” In Linguistic Landscape in the City, edited by E. Shohamy, E. Ben-Rafael, and M. Barni, 153–181. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, B. 2004. “Place, Globalization, and Linguistic Variation.” In Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections, edited by Carmen Fought, 65–83. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. H. 2005. “Sites of Engagement as Sites of Attention: Time, Space and Culture in Electronic Discourse.” In Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis, edited by S. Norris, and R. Jones, 141–154. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. H., and C. A. Hafner. 2012. Understanding Digital Literacies: A Practical Introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karlander, D. this issue. “Cities of Sociolinguistics.” Social Semiotics 31 (1).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koolhaas, R. 1994 [1978]. Delirious New York. New ed. New York: The Monacelli Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. 2015. “Digital Discourse@Public Space: Flows of Language Online and Offline.” In Discourse and Digital Practices: Doing Discourse Analysis in the Digital Age, edited by R. H. Jones, A. Chik, and C. A. Hafner, 175–192. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. 2017. Multilingualism Online. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. K. this issue. “Writing Singapore: Choreographed and Emergent Practices.” Social Semiotics 31 (1).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeman, J., and G. Modan. 2009. “Commodified Language in Chinatown: A Contextualized Approach to Linguistic Landscape.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 13 (3): 332–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H., and C. Régulier. 1996 [1984]. “Rhythmanalysis of Mediterranean Cities.” In Writings on Cities, by H. Lefebvre, translated and edited by E. Kofman, and E. Lebas, 228–240. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Li, W., and J. W. Y. Ho. 2018. “Language Learning Sans Frontiers: A Translanguaging View.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 38: 33–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., and H. Zhu. this issue. “Making Sense of Handwritten Signs in Public Spaces.” Social Semiotics 31 (1).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linde, C., and W. Labov. 1975. “Spatial Networks as a Site for the Study of Language and Thought.” Language 51: 924–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, J. J. 2016. The Linguistic Landscape of Chinatown: A Sociolinguistic Ethnography. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Low, S., ed. 2019. The Routledge Handbook of Anthropology and the City. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, K. 2019. “Let’s Get Phygital: Seeing Through the ‘Filtered’ Landscapes of Instagram.” Linguistic Landscape 5 (2): 179–197.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Giolla Chríost, D. 2007. Language and the City. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, T. A., and D. Cameron. 2002. The Words Between the Spaces: Buildings and Language. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W., ed. 1981. On Narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
   Google Scholar
• Modan, G. 2019. “The Semiotics of Urbanness: Lifestyle Centres and the Commodified City.” In The Routledge Handbook of Anthropology and the City, edited by S. Low, 326–341. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papen, U. 2012. “Commercial Discourses, Gentrification and Citizen’s Protest: The Linguistic Landscape of Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 16 (1): 56–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. 2010. Language as a Local Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perec, G. 1997 [1974]. Species of Spaces and Other Pieces. Edited and translated by John Sturrock. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Milans, M. this issue. “Futures, Imagined Cities and Emerging Markets: The Semiotic Production of Professional Selves.” Social Semiotics 31 (1).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrucci, A. 1993 [1980]. Public Lettering. Translated by Linda Lappin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, S. S. 2010. “The Unseen Photographer.” In Exposed: Voyeurism, Surveillance and the Camera, edited by S. S. Phillips, 18–23. London: Tate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pinder, D. 2005. Visions of the City: Utopianism, Power and Politics in Twentieth-Century Urbanism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pred, A. 1990. Lost Words and Lost Worlds: Modernity and the Language of Everyday Life in Late Nineteenth-Century Stockholm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rama, A. 1996 [1984]. The Lettered City. Edited and translated by J. C. Chasteen. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A. 1982. The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. Tuscon: Arizona University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, H. 2005. Writing Systems: A Linguistic Approach. Oxfords: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, S. 2005. Archigram: Architecture without Architecture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R. 2001. Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R., and S. Wong Scollon. 2004. Nexus Analysis. Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shep, S. J. 2015. “Urban Palimpsests and Contending Signs.” Social Semiotics 25 (2): 209–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, M. 2009. Image and Text in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, C., and S. Mpendukana. 2009. “Towards a Material Ethnography of Linguistic Landscape: Multilingualism, Mobility and Space in a South African Township.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 13 (3): 363–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay, E. 2012. “Street Meditations: On Poetry, Street Photography and Everyday Life in Hong Kong.” Asiatic 6 (2): 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2000. “With Child to See Any Strange Thing: Everyday Life in the City.” In A Companion to the City, edited by G. Bridge, and S. Watson, 398–409. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, C. 2016. “Queering Critical Discourse Studies or/and Performing ‘Post-Class’ Ideologies.” Critical Discourse Studies 13 (5): 485–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurlow, C., ed. 2020. The Business of Words: Wordsmiths, Linguists, and Other Language Workers. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, C. this issue. “When Globalese Meets Localese: Transformational Tactics in the Typographic Landscape—A Bernese Case Study.” Social Semiotics 31 (1).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinch, S., and E. Snajdr. 2020. What the Signs Say: Language, Gentrification, and Place-Making in Brooklyn. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, Y.-F. 1991. “Language and the Making of Place: A Narrative-Descriptive Approach.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81 (4): 684–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbroucke, M. 2016. “Socio-economic Stratification of English in Globalized Landscapes: A Market-Oriented Perspective.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 20 (1): 86–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbroucke, M. 2018. “Multilingualism, Urban Change and Gentrification in the Landscape of a Brussels Neighbourhood.” Multilingua 37 (1): 25–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T., and C. M. Johannessen. 2018. “Introduction.” In The Materiality of Writing: A Trace Making Perspective, edited by C. M. Johannessen, and T. van Leeuwen, 1–11. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Virilio, P. 1991. The Lost Dimension. New York: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Zappavigna, M. 2015. “Searchable Talk: The Linguistic Functions of Hashtags.” Social Semiotics 25 (3): 274–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., E. Otsuji, and A. Pennycook, eds. 2017. “Multilingual, Multisensory and Multimodal Repertoires in Corner Shops, Streets and Markets.” Special Issue of Social Semiotics 27 (4): 393–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukin, S. 1990. “Socio-Spatial Prototypes of a New Organization of Consumption: The Role of Real Cultural Capital.” Sociology 24 (1): 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Zukin, S. 1994. Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to Disneyland. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zukin, S. 1995. The Cultures of Cities. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar