The Resemiotisation of Chokri Belaid’s talk before his assassination: roles of sign-maker interest and re-reading forces

References

• Adami, Elisabetta. 2015. “What’s in a Click? A Social Semiotic Framework for the Multimodal Analysis of Website Interactivity.” Visual Communication 14 (2): 133–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljazeera. 2013. “Profile Shokri Belaid”. Updated February 7, 2013. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2013/2/7/profi.0le-shokri-belaid.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, Roland. 1967. “The Death of the Author.” Aspen: The Magazine in a Box 5+6. http://www.ubu.com/aspen/aspen5and6/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, Tom. 2018. “Rethinking (Context of) Culture in Systemic Functional Linguistics.” In Perspectives from Systemic Functional Linguistics, edited by Akila Sellami-Baklouti, and Lise Fontaine, 26–46. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, John. 2008. Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, Jeff, and Carey Jewitt. 2010. “Multimodal Analysis: Key Issues.” In Research Methods in Linguistics, edited by Lia Litosseliti, 180–197. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, Jeff, and Gunther Kress. 2008. “Writing in Multimodal Texts: A Social Semiotic Account of Designs for Learning.” Written Communication 25 (2): 166–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, Paul, and Vincent J. Van Heuven. 2001. “Speak and Unspeak with PRAAT.” Glot International 5 (9/10): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Cimasko, Tony, and Dong-Shin Shin. 2017. “Multimodal Resemiotization and Authorial Agency in an L2 Writing Classroom.” Written Communication 34 (4): 387–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djonov, Emilia, and Sumin Zhao. 2018. “Social Semiotics: A Theorist and a Theory in Retrospect and Prospect.” In Advancing Multimodal and Critical Discourse Studies: Interdisciplinary Research Inspired by Theo Van Leeuwen’s Social Semiotics, edited by Sumin Zhao, Emilia Djonov, Anders Björkvall, and Morten Boeriis, 1–18. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edge, Sarah. 2014. “Reading the Fenian Photographs: A Historically and Culturally Located Study.” In Visual Communication, edited by David Machin, 104–126. Berlin and Boston: DE Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, John. 2003. “History as Discourse; Discourse as History: “The Rise of Modern China” – A History Exhibition in Post-Colonial Hong Kong.” In Re/Reading the Past Critical and Functional Perspectives on Time and Value, edited by Jonathan R. Martin and Ruth Wodak, 195–217. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fontaine, Lise. 2013. “Introduction: Choice in Contemporary Systemic Functional Theory.” In Systemic Functional Linguistic: Exploring Choice, edited by Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett, and Gerard O’ Grady, 1–12. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, Charles. 2014. “Relevance Theory as Model for Analysing Visual and Multimodal Communication.” In Visual Communication, edited by David Machin, 81–104. Berlin and Boston: DE Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotics: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. London: Arnold (1st ed., 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 2013. “Meaning as Choice.” In Systemic Functional Linguistic: Exploring Choice, edited by Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett, and Gerard O’ Grady, 15–36. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K., and William Greaves. 2008. Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1989. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Arnold (1st ed., 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofinger, Andrea, and Eija Ventola. 2004. “Multimodality in Operation: Language and Picture in a Museum.” In Perspectives on Multimodality, edited by Eija Ventola, Charles Cassily, and Martin Kaltenbacher, 193–210. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Iedema, Rick. 2001. “Resemiotization.” Semiotica 137 (1): 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iedema, Rick. 2003. “Multimodality, Resemiotization: Extending the Analysis of Discourse as a Multisemiotic Practice.” Visual Communication 2 (1): 29–57.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, Carey. 2004. “Multimodality and New Communication Technologies.” In Discourse and Technology: A Multimodal Analysis, edited by Philip LeVine, and Ron Scollon, 575–593. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, Carey. 2009. Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Rodney H. 2004. “The Problem of Context in Computer-Mediated Communication.” In Discourse and Technology: A Multimodal Analysis, edited by Philip LeVine, and Ron Scollon, 20–33. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Graphic Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourses: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ledin, Per, and David Machin. 2018. “Multi-modal Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 60–76. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ledin, Per, and David Machin. 2019. “Doing Critical Discourse Studies with Multimodality: From Metafunction to Materiality.” Critical Discourse Studies 16 (5): 497–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, Jay L. 1998. “Multiplying Meaning: Visual and Verbal Semiotics in Scientific Text.” In Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives, edited by Jonathan R. Martin, and Robert Veel, 87–113. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Le Monde. 2012. “Le “procès Persepolis” interroge la liberté d'expression en Tunisie.” Updated April 20, 2012. https://www.lemonde.fr/tunisie/article/2012/04/20/le-proces-tunisie_1688451_1466522.html?contributions.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Victor Fei. 2004. “Problematising Semiotic Resource.” In Perspectives on Multimodality, edited by Eija Ventola, Charles Cassily, and Martin Kaltenbacher, 51–64. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Victor Fei. 2017. “Analysing the Teachers’ Use of Gestures in the Classroom: A Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis Approach.” Social Semiotics 29 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1080/10350330.2017.1412168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Victor Fei. 2018. “A Systemic Functional Approach to Teach Multimodal Literacy.” Functional Linguistics 5 (13). doi:10.1186/s40554-018-0066-8.
   Google Scholar
• Lotha, Gloria. 2008. “Hyperphysics - Sound Intensity.” Updated December 18, 2008. https://www.britannica.com/science/sound-intensity.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, David, and Andrea Mayr. 2012. How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, Jacques. 2007. ““Persepolis” ou la Douleur Intime de l'Exil: Un Dessin Animé Coréalisé par Vincent Paronnaud et Marjane Satrapi, d'après sa BD.” Updated May 24, 2007. https://www.lemonde.fr/culture/article/2007/05/24/persepolis-ou-la-douleur-intime-de-l-exil_914422_3246.html.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Jonathan R., and Ruth Wodak. 2003. “Introduction.” In Re/Reading the Past Critical and Functional Perspectives on Time and Value, edited by Johnathan R. and Ruth Wodak, 1–17. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Martinec, Radan. 2004. “Gestures That Co-Occur with Speech as a Systematic Resource: The Realization of Experiential Meaning in Indexes.” Social Semiotics 14 (2): 193–213.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Kazuhiro Teruya, and Marvin Lam. 2010. Key Terms in Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Menz, Florian, Jonathan R. Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2003. “The Languages of the Past: On The Re-Construction of a Collective History Through Individual Stories.” In Re/Reading the Past Critical and Functional Perspectives on Time and Value, edited by Johnathan R. Martin and Ruth Wodak, 139–176. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Monfared, Narjes, and Farideh Haghbin. 2019. “The Resemioticisation of the Socio-Cultural Construct of Nowruz Festival in Tehran’s “Fatemi Spring” Billboards.” Social Semiotics 29 (2): 204–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, Evan. 2012. “Multimodality and Literacy.” In The Encyclopaedia of Applied Linguistics, edited by Chapelle A. Carol, 4049–4055. Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing LTD.
   Google Scholar
• Nessma. 2013. “Chokri Belaid: le Réquisitoire qui Enrageait les Assassins.” Webamri.amri Blog. Updated February 12, 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAlG1UWCvXs&fbclid=IwAR1PJhFw3pvn6XpOT38faDmdia2yObuIWump8xxMHktB3szFrWVhxJ-UT_A.
   Google Scholar
• Nessma. 2014. “Words of the Martyr Chokri Belaid History Will Remember.” Updated February 7, 2014. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63V6Acq3f_o&t=286s.
   Google Scholar
• O' Halloran, Kay. 2011. “Multimodal Discourse Analysis.” In Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis, edited by Ken Hyland and Brian Paltridge, 120–137. London and New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• O'Halloran, Kay L. 2010. “The Semantic Hyperspace: Accumulating Mathematical Knowledge Across Semiotic Resources and Modalities.” In Disciplinarity: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives, edited by Frances Christie, and Karl Maton, 217–236. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, Kay L., and Victor Fei Lim. 2009. “Sequential Visual Discourse Frames.” In The World Told and the World Shown: Multisemiotic Issues, edited by Eija Ventola, and Arsenio Jesus Moya Guijarro, 139–156. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O'Halloran, Kay L., and Bradley A. Smith. 2011. “Multimodal Studies.” In Multimodal Studies: Exploring Issues and Domains, edited by Kay L. O’ Halloran, and Bradley A. Smith, 1–13. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, Kay L., Sabine Tan, Bradley Smith, and Alexey Podlasov. 2011. “Multimodal Analysis Within an Interactive Software Environment: Critical Discourse Perspectives.” Critical Discourse Studies 18 (2): 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Oostendorp, Marcelyn. 2017. “Extending Resemiotisation: Time, Space and Body in Discursive Representation.” Social Semiotics 27 (1): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, Michael. 1994. The Language of Displayed Art. London: Leicester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, Amiene, and Felix Banda. 2014. “Observatory's Linguistic Landscape: Semiotic Appropriation and the Reinvention of Space.’.” Social Semiotics 24 (3): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roderick, Ian. 2014. “Military Hardware as Affective Objects: Towards a Social Semiotics of Militainment Television.” In Visual Communication, edited by David Machin, 104–126. Berlin and Boston: DE Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, Ron. 1998. Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction: A Study of News Discourse. London and New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Stőckl, Hartmut. 2004. “In Between Modes: Language and Image in Printed Media.” In Perspectives on Multimodality, edited by Eija Ventola, Charles Cassidy, and Martin Kaltenbacher, 9–30. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Stőckl, Hartmut. 2015. “From Text-Linguistics to Multimodality: Mapping Concepts and Methods Across Domains.” In Building Bridges for Multimodal Research: International Perspectives on Theories and Practices of Multimodal Analysis, edited by Janina Wildfeuer, 51–75. Bern /New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, C., and S. Mpendukana. 2009. Towards a Material Ethnography of Linguistic Landscape: Multilingualism, Mobility and Space in a South African Township Towards a Material Ethnography of Linguistic Landscape: Multilingualism, Mobility and Space in a South African township.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, Christopher, and Sibonile Mpendukana. 2010. “Multilingual Signage: A Multimodal Approach to Discourses of Consumption in a South African Township.” Social Semiotics 20 (5): 469–493.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Sabine. 2005. A Systemic Functional Approach to the Analysis of Corporate Television Advertisements. Unpublished MA, National University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Sabine. 2009. “A Systemic Functional Framework for the Analysis of Corporate Television Advertisements.” In The World Told and the World Shown: Multisemiotic Issues, edited by Eija Ventola, and Arsenio Jesus Moya Guijarro, 157–182. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Geoff. 2014. Introducing Functional Grammar. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckwell, Kathryn. 2009. “Floods and Fidget Wheels: A Comparative Systemic Functional Analysis of Slessor’s ‘Five Bells’ and Olsen’s ‘Salute to Five Bells’.” In The World Told and the World Shown: Multisemiotic Issues, edited by Eija Ventola, and Arsenio Jesus Moya Guijarro, 266–288. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, Teun A. 2009. Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, Theo. 1999. Speech, Music, Sound. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2009. “Parametric Systems: The Case of Voice Quality.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, edited by Carey Jewitt, 68–78. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2015. “Multimodal Meaning Potential.” In Key Terms in Multimodality: Definitions, Issues, Discussions, edited by Nina Nørgaard. Accessed July 5, 2021. https://multimodalkeyterms.wordpress.com.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2016. “Choice.” In Key Terms in Multimodality: Definitions, Issues, Discussions, edited by Nina Nørgaard. Accessed July 5, 2021. https://multimodalkeyterms.wordpress.com.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118.
   Google Scholar
• White, Paul. 2012. “Reception as Social Action: The Case of Marketing.” In Multimodality in Practice Investigating Theory-in-Practice- Through-Methodology, edited by Sigrid Norris, 138–152. UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wildfeuer, Janina. 2015. “Bridging the Gap between Here and There: Combining Multimodal Analysis from International Perspectives.” In Building Bridges for Multimodal Research: International Perspectives on Theories and Practices of Multimodal Analysis, edited by Janina Wildfeuer, 13–33. Bern /New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Yiqiong, and Kay L. O’ Halloran. 2019. “Empowering the Point: Pains and Gains of a Writer’s Traversals Between Print-Based Writing and Multimodal Composing.” Linguistics and Education 51: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar