Climate irresponsibility on social media. A critical approach to “high-carbon visibility discourse”

References

• Abel, Susan, Tanya Machin, and Charlotte Brownlow. 2020. “Social Media, Rituals, and Long-Distance Family Relationships Maintenance: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.” New Media & Society, doi:10.1177/1461444820958717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Saqaf, Walid, and Peter Berglez. 2019. “How Do Social Media Users Link Different Types of Extreme Events to Climate Change? A Study of Twitter During 2008–2017.” Journal of Extreme Events 6 (2): 1–27. doi:10.1142/S2345737619500027.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Alison G. 2014. Media, Environment and Network Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Ashley A., and Heidi E Huntington. 2017. “Social Media, Science, and Attack Discourse: How Twitter Discussions of Climate Change Use Sarcasm and Incivility.” Science Communication 39 (5): 598–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelgren, Ester, and Anna-Maria Jönsson. 2020. “Engaging Citizens for Climate Change – Challenges for Journalism.” Digital Journalism. doi:10.1080/21670811.2020.1827965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthes, Roland. 1971. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. New York: Hill & Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Bechmann, Anja, Kjetil Sandvik, and Karin Zelano. 2019. “Making Sense of Small and Big Data as Onlife Traces.” Nordicom Review 1 (40): 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Ulrich, and Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim. 2002. Individualization. Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, Åsa. 2019. “Vi är allt fler som ser världen genom ett klimatfilter.” Dagens Nyheter 12 December, 2019. https://www.dn.se/kultur-noje/asa-beckman-vi-ar-allt-fler-som-ser-varlden-genom-ett-klimatfilter/.
   Google Scholar
• Berglez, Peter. 2011. “Inside, Outside, and Beyond Media Logic: Journalistic Creativity in Climate Reporting.” Media, Culture and Society 33 (3): 449–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglez, Peter. 2018. “Smileys Without Borders. A Critique of Transboundary Interaction Between Politicians, Journalists and PR Practitioners on Social Media.” tripleC 16 (1): 18–34.
   Google Scholar
• Berglez, Peter, and Walid Al-Saqaf. 2021. “Extreme Weather and Climate Change: Social Media Results, 2008–2017.” Environmental Hazards 20 (4): 382–399. doi:10.1080/17477891.2020.1829532..
   Google Scholar
• Berglez, Peter, Birgitta Höijer, and Ulrika Olausson. 2009. “Individualization and Nationalization of the Climate Issue.” In Two Ideological Horizons in Swedish News Media, edited by Tammy Boyce, and J. Justin Lewis, 211–223. Climate Change and the Media. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Berglez, Peter, and Ulrika Olausson. 2014. “The Post-Political Condition of Climate Change: An Ideology Approach.” Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 25 (1): 54–71.
   Google Scholar
• Born, Dorothea. 2018. “Bearing Witness? Polar Bears as Icons for Climate Change Communication in National Geographic.” Environmental Communication 13 (5): 649–663.
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, Maxwell T. 2012. Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, Axel, and Brenda Moon. 2019. “One Day in the Life of a National Twittersphere.” Nordicom Review 1: 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, Gustavo. 2012. “Networked Life World: Four Dimensions of the Cultures of Networked Belonging.” Observatorio (OBS*) Journal. 197–205.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel. 2009. Communication Power. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, Paul, Emily Harris, Sophie Guy, Julian Fernando, Daniel B. Shank, Tim Kurz, Paul G. Bain, and Yoshihisa Kashima. 2016. “Interpersonal Communication about Climate Change: How Messages Change When Communicated Through Simulated Online Networks.” Climatic Change 136: 463–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culloty, Eileen, Padraig Murphy, Patrick Brereton, Jane Suiter, Alan F. Smeaton, and Dian Zhang. 2019. “Researching Visual Representations of Climate Change.” Environmental Communication 13 (2): 179–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Emmy. 2014. If Handling Environmental Problems Is Up To Me. Individuals Negotiate Their Environmental Responsibility. The Tema Institute Technology and Social Change: Linköping University. (doctoral dissertation).
   Google Scholar
• de Certau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, Julie. 2007. “Picturing the Clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the Representational Politics of Climate Change Communication.” Science as Culture 16 (2): 129–150.
   Google Scholar
• Enke, Nadja, and Nils S. Borchers. 2019. “Social Media Influencers in Strategic Communication: A Conceptual Framework for Strategic Social Media Influencer Communication.” International Journal of Strategic Communication 13 (4): 261–277.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Emmott. 2014. Society, Power and Climate Change. A Social Critique of Public Climate Change Reciprocity in Ireland (PhD thesis). Galway: Galway University.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Stuart. 1996. “Encoding/Decoding.” In Culture, Media, Language. Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79, edited by Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe, and Paul Willis, 117–127. London: Hutchinson in association with the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Anders, and David Machin, eds. 2016. Visual Environmental Communication. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, Alison. 2008. “Meat, Mask, Burden: Probing the Contours of the Branded ‘Self’.” Journal of Consumer Culture 8 (2): 197–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, Bernie. 2010. “The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30 (6): 377–386.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, Mike. 2014. “Attributing Weather Extremes to ‘Climate Change’: A Review.” Progress in Physical Geography 38 (4): 499–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, Mike. 2017. Weathered. Cultures of Climate. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC and Melbourne: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, Martin R. 2020. “Män i klimatkrisen.” Socialmedicinsk tidskrift 97 (2): 255–265.
   Google Scholar
• Janković, Vladimir, and David M. Schultz. 2017. “Atmosfear: Communicating the Effects of Climate Change on Extreme Weather.” Weather, Climate, Society 9 (1): 27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaijser, Anna, and Annica Kronsell. 2014. “Climate Change through the Lens of Intersectionality .” Environmental Politics 23 (3): 417–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, Anneleen, and Mathias Lievens. 2015. The Limits of the Green Economy. From Reinventing Capitalism to Depoliticising the Present. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, Rebecca, and Rachael Hannay. 2020. “Explaining ‘Carbon’ in Community Sequestration Projects: a Key Element in the Creation of Local Carbon Knowledges.” Environmental Communication 14 (3): 364–377.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Kunelius, Risto, and Elisabeth Eide. 2012. “Moment of Hope, Mode of Realism. On the Dynamics of a Transnational Journalistic Field during UN Climate Change Summits.” International Journal of Communication 6: 266–285.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Hellmuth, and Lars Meyer, eds. 2009. The New Middle Classes. Globalizing Lifestyles, Consumerism and Environmental Concern. Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, John Chung-En, and Bo Zhao. 2017. “Who Speaks for Climate Change in China? Evidence from Weibo.” Climatic Change 140: 413–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukács, György. 1971. History and Class Consciousness. London: Merlin.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, David. 2007. Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. New York: Hodder Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, Andreas. 2016. Fossil Capital. The Rise of the Stream Power and the Roots of Global Warming. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, Andreas. 2018. The Progress of this Storm. Nature and Society in a Warming World. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Midberry, Jennifer, Ryan N. Comfort, and Joseph E. Roskos. 2020. “Celebrating Life or Adversity? The Redefinition of Features in the Picture of the Year International Contest.” Journalism 21 (6): 766–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Melissa M., and Janet Z. Yang. 2020. “Using Eco-Guilt to Motivate Environmental Behavior Change.” Environmental Communication 14 (4): 522–536.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, Serge. 2001. Social Representations. Explorations in Social Psychology. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olausson, Ulrika. 2010. “Towards a European Identity? The News Media and the Case of Climate Change.” European Journal of Communication 25 (2): 138–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olausson, Ulrika. 2018. “ ’Stop Blaming the Cows!’ How Livestock Production is Legitimized in Everyday Discourse on Facebook.” Environmental Communication 12 (1): 28–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olausson, Ulrika. 2019. “Meat as a Matter of Fact(s): The Role of Science in Everyday Representations of Livestock Production on Social Media.” JCOM 18 (06): A01.
   Google Scholar
• Olausson, Ulrika. 2020. “Making Sense of the Human-Nature Relationship: A Reception Study of the ‘Nature Is Speaking’ Campaign on YouTube.” Nature and Culture 15 (3): 272–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olausson, Ulrika, and Ylva Uggla. 2021. “Celebrities Celebrifying Nature: The Discursive Construction of the Human-Nature Relationship in the ‘Nature is Speaking’-Campaign.” Celebrity Studies 12 (3): 353–370. doi:10.1080/19392397.2019.1626749..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S. 2019. “More Than Meets the eye: A Longitudinal Analysis of Climate Change Imagery in the Print Media.” Climatic Change, 1–18. doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02504-8.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Zizi. 2011. “Conclusions: A Networked Self.” In A Networked Self. Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, edited by Zizi Papacharissi, 304–318. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pepermans, Yves, and Pieter Maeseele. 2016. “The Politicization of Climate Change: Problem or Solution?” WIRES Climate Change 7: 478–485.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Tina. 2011. Join the Club: How Peer Pressure Can Transform the World. New York and London: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Rudiak-Gould, Peter. 2013. “We Have Seen It With Our Own Eyes: Why We Disagree About Climate Change Visibility.” Weather, Climate, Society 5. doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00034.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, Mike, Peter Berglez, Hartmut Wessler, Elisabeth Eide, Brigitte Nerlich, and Saffron O’Neill. 2016. Investigating Mediated Climate Change Communication: A Best-Practice Guide. Research Reports No 6. Jönköping: School of Education and Communication, Jönköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Raz, and Germaine R. Halegoua. 2015. “The Spatial Self: Location-Based Identity Performance on Social Media.” New Media & Society 17 (10): 1643–1660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, Erik. 2010. “Apocalypse Forever? Post-political Populism and the Spectre of Climate Change.” Theory, Culture & Society 28 (2–3): 214–232.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, John B. 1990. Ideology and Modern Culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, John B. 1995. The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, John B. 2000. Political Scandal. Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, John B. 2005. “The New Visibility.” Theory, Culture & Society 22 (6): 31–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, Kjerstin, and Luping Wang. 2019. “Committed Participation or Flashes of Action. Mobilizing Public Attention to Climate Change on Twitter, 2011–2015.” Environmental Communication 14 (3): 347–363.
   Google Scholar
• Tolson, Andrew. 2010. “A New Authenticity? Communicative Practices on YouTube.” Critical Discourse Studies 7 (4): 277–289.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Veltri, Giuseppe A., and Dimitrinka Atanasova. 2017. “Climate Change on Twitter: Content, Media Ecology and Information Sharing Behaviour.” Public Understanding of Science 26 (6): 721–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, Lorraine, Gill Seyfang, and Saffron O’Neill. 2011. “Public Engagement with Carbon and Climate Change: To What Extent is the Public ‘Carbon Capable’?” Global Environmental Change 21: 56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolrath Söderberg, Maria, and Nina Wormbs. 2019. Grounded. Beyond flygskam. ELF/Fores: Ixelles and Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, Sara K., Zachary Handlos, Alexandra Karambelas, Leona Yi-Fan Su, Kathleen M. Rose, Dominique Brossard, and Kyle Griffin. 2017. “The Influence of Temperature on #ClimateChange and #GlobalWarming Discourses on Twitter.” Journal of Science Communication 16 (05): A01.
   Google Scholar
• Zizek, Slavoj. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Zizek, Slavoj, eds. 1994. Mapping Ideology. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar