The scientifization of “green” anti-ageing cosmetics in online marketing: a multimodal critical discourse analysis

References

• Arroyo, M. D. 2013. “Scientific Language in Skin-Care Advertising: Persuading Through Opacity.” RESLA 26: 197–213.
   Google Scholar
• Arroyo, M. D. 2014. ““Ageing Youthfully” or the Rhetoric of Medical English in Advertising.” Ibérica 28: 83–106.
   Google Scholar
• Benwell, B., and E. Stokoe. 2006. Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2005. Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banet-Weiser, S. 2012. Authentic TMs: Politics and Ambivalence in a Brand Culture. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calasanti, T., N. King, I. Pietila, and H. Ojala. 2016. “Rationales for Anti-Aging Activities in Middle Age: Aging, Health or Appearance?” The Gerontologist 58 (2): 233–241. doi:10.1093/geront/gnw111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.-Y. 2015. “Investigating the Discursive Productions of Science in Advertising.” Intercultural Communication Studies 24 (2): 207–224.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, A., and G. Eriksson. 2021. “Connoting a Neoliberal and Entrepreneurial Discourse of Discourse of Science Through Infographics and Integrated Design: The Case of ‘Functional’ Healthy Drinks.” Critical Discourse Studies, 1–19. doi:10.1080/17405904.2021.1874450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupland, J. 2003. “Ageist Ideology and Discourses of Control in Skincare.” In Discourse, the Body and Identity, edited by J. Coupland, and R. Gwyn, 127–150. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Coupland, J. 2007. “Gendered Discourses on the ‘Problem’ of Ageing: Consumerized Solutions.” Discourse and Communication 1 (1): 37–61. doi:10.1177/1750481307071984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupland, J. 2009. “Time, the Body and the Reversibility of Ageing: Commodifying the Decade.” Ageing and Society 29: 953–976. doi:10.1017/S0144686X0g008794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, G., and D. Machin. 2020. “Discourses of ‘Good Food’: The Commercialization of Healthy and Ethical Eating.” Discourse, Context and Media 33: 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria-Silva, C., A. Ascenso, A. M. Costa, J. Marto, M. Carvalheiro, H. M. Ribeiro, and S. Simoes. 2020. “Feeding the Skin: A New Trend in Food and Cosmetics Convergence.” Trends in Food Science and Technology 95: 21–32. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2019.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, M. 2010. “Body, Image and Affect in Consumer Culture.” Body and Society 16 (1): 193–221. doi:10.1177/1357034X09354357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1977. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, J. G., T. H. Reisenwitz, and L. Carlson. 2015. “Deception in Cosmetics Advertising: Examining Cosmetics Advertising Claims in Fashion Magazine Ads.” Journal of Global Fashion Marketing 6 (3): 194–206. doi:10.1080/20932685.2015.1032319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R. 2007a. “Postfeminist Media Culture: Elements of a Sensibility.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 10 (2): 147–166. doi:10.1177/1367549407075898.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. 2007b. Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. 2008. “Commodity Feminism.” In Vol. 3 The International Encyclopaedia of Communication, edited by W. Donsbach, 583–585. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. 2021. “Neoliberal Beauty.” In The Routledge Companion to Beauty Politics, edited by M. Leeds Craig, 9–18. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, R. 1992. Reading Ads Socially. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., D. Heath, and S. L. Smith. 1991. “Commodity Feminism.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 8: 333–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I. 2001. “Technologies, Texts and Affordances.” Sociology 35 (2): 441–456. doi:10.1177/S0038038501000219.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., and J. Taylor. 2008. “Feminist Consumerism and Fat Activists: A Comparative Study of Grassroots Activism and the Dove Real Beauty Campaign.” Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and Society 33 (4): 941–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenalemang, L. M. 2021. “Visual Ageism and the Subtle Sexualisation of Older Celebrities in L’Oréal’s Advert Campaigns: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis.” Ageing and Society, 1–18. doi:10.1017/S0144686X20002019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• LaWare, M. R., and C. Moutsatsos. 2013. “’For Skin That’s Us, Authentically Us’: Celebrity, Empowerment, and the Allure of Antiaging Advertisements.” Women’s Studies in Communication 36 (2): 189–208. doi:10.1080/07491409.2013.794753.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, M. M. 2006. “‘Discover the Power of Femininity!’ Analyzing Global ‘Power Femininity’ in Local Advertising.” Feminist Media Studies 6 (4): 505–517. doi:10.1080/14680770600990002.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, M. M. 2011. “The Right to Be Beautiful: Postfeminist Identity and Consumer Beauty Advertising.” In New Femininities: Postfesminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity, edited by Rosalind Gill, and Christina Scharff, 37–51. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ledin, P., and D. Machin. 2015. “How Lists, Bullet Points and Tables Recontextualize Social Practice.” Critical Discourse Studies 12 (4): 463–481. doi:10.1080/17405904.2015.1039556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledin, P., and D. Machin. 2018. Doing Visual Analysis from Theory to Practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ledin, P., and D. Machin. 2020. Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, C., A. Petersen, and C. Parker. 2018. “Promoting a Healthier, Younger You: The Media Marketing of Anti-Ageing Superfoods.” Journal of Consumer Culture 21 (2): 164–179. doi:10.1177/1469540518773825.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, D. 2013. “What is Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies?” Critical Discourse Studies 10 (4): 347–355. doi:10.1080/17405904.2013.813770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mire, A. 2012. “The Scientification of Skin Whitening and the Entrepreneurial University-Linked Corporate Scientific Officer.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology 12 (3): 272–291..
   Google Scholar
• Myers, G. 1999. Ad Worlds: Brand, Media, Audiences. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, J. K., N. Masub, and J. Jagdeo. 2020. “Bioactive Ingredients in Korean Cosmeceuticals: Trends and Research Evidence.” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 19: 1555–1569. doi:10.1111/jocd.13344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringrow, H. 2014. “Peptides, Proteins and Peeling Active Ingredients: Exploring ‘Scientific’ Language in English and French Cosmetics Advertising.” Études de Stylistique Anglaise 7: 183–210. doi:10.4000/esa.1322.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrow, H. 2016. The Language of Cosmetic Advertising. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rozanova, J. 2010. “Discourse of Successful Aging in The Globe and Mail: Insights from Critical Gerontology.” Journal of Aging Studies 24: 213–222..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrinis, G. 2013. Nutritionism: The Science and Politics of Dietary Advice. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searing, C., and H. Zeilig. 2017. “Fine Lines: Cosmetic Advertising and the Perception of Ageing Female Beauty.” International Journal of Ageing and Later Life 11 (1): 7–36. doi:10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.16-290.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics: An Introductory Textbook. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. 2008. “New Forms of Writing, New Visual Competencies.” Visual Studies 23 (2): 130–145. doi:10.1080/14725860802276263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar