“Is your font racist?” Metapragmatic online discourses on the use of typographic mimicry and its appropriateness

References

• Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Alessandrini, Jean-Antoine. 1979. “Une Nouvelle Classification Typographique: Le Codex 1980.” Communication et Langages 43: 35–56.
   Google Scholar
• Alessandrini, Jean-Antoine. 1983. “Demandez Le Programme.” Communication et Langages 57: 29–43.
   Google Scholar
• Celhay, Franck, Jacqueline Boysselle, and Justin Cohen. 2015. “Food Packages and Communication Through Typeface Design: The Exoticism of Exotypes.” Food Quality and Preference 39: 167–175. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, Elaine W. 2008. “Ideologies of Legitimate Mockery: Margaret Cho’s Revoicings of Mock Asian.” In Beyond Yellow English: Toward a Linguistic Anthropology of Asian Pacific America, edited by Angie Reyes, and Adrienne Lo, 261–287. Oxford, New York: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Coulmas, Florian. 1996. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Writing Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Coulmas, Florian. 2014. “Writing Systems and Language Contact in the Euro- and Sinocentric Worlds.” Applied Linguistics Review 5 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1515/applirev-2014-0001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coville, C. 2013. “5 Genuinely Offensive Font Choices That Must be Stopped.” Cracked.com. https://www.cracked.com/blog/5-genuinely-offensive-font-choices-that-must-be-stopped/.
   Google Scholar
• Donzelli, Aurora, and Alexandra Powell Budgen. 2019. “The ‘Tiny Hand’ of Donald Trump and the Metapragmatics of Typographic Parody.” Signs and Society 7 (2): 217–244. doi:10.1086/702567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Jenn. 2012. “Jeff Yang Contemplates the Casual Racism of Yellowface Fonts.” Reappropriate: Asian American Feminism, Politics, and Pop Culture. http://reappropriate.co/2012/06/jeff-yang-contemplates-the-casual-racism-of-yellowface-fonts/.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, Nichole. 2015. “StereoTYPES.” It Ain’t Necessarily So. https://itaint-necessarilyso.squarespace.com/articles/2015/11/17/stereotypes.
   Google Scholar
• Fraas, Claudia, and Christian Pentzold. 2008. “Online-Diskurse – Theoretische Prämissen, methodische Anforderungen und analytische Befunde.” In Methoden der Diskurslinguistik. Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge zur transtextuellen Ebene, edited by Ingo H. Warnke, and Jürgen Spitzmüller, 287–322. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110209372.4.287.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, Simon. 2010. Just My Type. A Book About Fonts. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, Peter. 2005. “Attitude Measurements.” In Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, 2nd ed., edited by Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier, and Peter Trudgill, 1251–1260. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110171488.2.7.1251.
   Google Scholar
• Giampietro, Rob. 2004. “New Black Face: Neuland and Lithos as Stereotypography.” Lined & Unlined. https://linedandunlined.com/archive/new-black-face/.
   Google Scholar
• Guerini, Federica. 2019. “Orthography and Graphemics.” In Language Contact, Vol. 1, edited by Jeroen Darquennes, Joe C. Salmons, and Wim Vandenbussche, 76–88. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110435351-007.
   Google Scholar
• Helfand, Jessica. 2007. “Why Is This Font Different From All Other Fonts?” Design Observer. https://designobserver.com/feature/why-is-this-font-different-from-all-other-fonts/5597.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, Susan C. 2004. “Computer-mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Communities.” In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, edited by Sasha A. Barab, Rob Kling, and James H. Gray, 338–376. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Järlehed, Johan, and Adam Jaworski. 2015. “Typographic Landscaping: Creativity, Ideology, Movement.” Special Issue of Social Semiotics 25 (2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Sojin, and Somi Kim. 1993. “Typecast: Meaning, Culture, and Identity in the Alphabetic Omelet.” In Lift and Separate: Graphic Design and the Quote Unquote Vernacular, edited by Barbara Glauber, 30–37. New York: The Herb Lubalin Study Center of Design and Typography.
   Google Scholar
• Kleining, Gerhard. 2004. Qualitativ-heuristische Sozialforschung: Schriften zur Theorie und Praxis. Hamburg: Fechner.
   Google Scholar
• Kleining, Gerhard, and Harald Witt. 2000. “The Qualitative Heuristic Approach: A Methodology for Discovery in Psychology and the Social Sciences. Rediscovering the Method of Introspection as an Example.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1 (1): Art. 13. doi:10.17169/fqs-1.1.1123.
   Google Scholar
• Kroskrity, Paul V. 2004. “Language Ideologies.” In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, edited by Alessandro Duranti, 496–517. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Josephine. 2019. “Yellowface Performance: Historical and Contemporary Contexts.” Oxford Research Encyclopedias – Literature. https://oxfordre.com/literature/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-834.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Wan-Hsin, and Hsi-Yao Su. 2019. “‘You are in Taiwan, Speak Chinese’: Identity, Language Ideology, and Sociolinguistic Scales in Online Interaction.” Discourse, Context & Media 32: 100339. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lily. 2012. “Stereotype(face): Origins of the Chop Suey Font.” 8Asians. An Asian American Collaborative Blog. https://www.8asians.com/2012/02/21/stereotypeface-the-chop-suey-font/.
   Google Scholar
• Maani, Khalid. 2019. “Is Your Font Choice Based on Your White Privilege?” Medium. https://medium.com/@khalidmaani/is-your-font-choice-based-on-your-white-privilege-b63f6bda056.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, Stefan. 2014. (Bild-)Diskurs im Netz. Konzept und Methode für eine semiotische Diskursanalyse im World Wide Web. 2nd ed. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Meletis, Dimitrios. 2020a. The Nature of Writing: A Theory of Grapholinguistics. Brest: Fluxus Éditions. doi:10.36824/2020-meletis.
   Google Scholar
• Meletis, Dimitrios. 2020b. “Warum hassen alle Comic Sans? Metapragmatische Onlinediskurse zu einer typographischen Hassliebe.” In Register des Graphischen: Variation, Praktiken, Reflexion, edited by Jannis Androutsopoulos, and Florian Busch, 253–284. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110673241-010.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Keith M. 2017. “Fontroversy! Or, How to Care about the Shape of Language.” In Language and Materiality. Ethnographic and Theoretical Explorations, edited by Jillian R. Cavanaugh, and Shalini Shankbar, 63–86. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, Alexander. 2011. “Twenty-five Notes on Pseudoscript in Italian Art.” Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics 59–60: 229–248. doi:10.1086/RESvn1ms23647792.
   Google Scholar
• Patil, Priyanka, and Julia Owens. 2019. “Political Awareness and Typography: How an Analysis of the Intersection of Racially Linked Typography in Propaganda and Historical Analysis Can Help Predict Rising Political Conflict.” Typography Day 2019. https://www.typoday.in/2019/spk_papers/priyanka_patil_typoday_2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Quito, Anne. 2021. “Karate, Wonton, Chow Fun: The End of ‘Chop Suey’ Fonts.” CNN Style. https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/chop-suey-fonts-hyphenated/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Salen, Katie. 2001. “Surrogate Multiplicities: Typography in the Age of Invisibility.” Visible Language 35 (2): 132–153.
   Google Scholar
• Sebba, Mark. 2015. “Iconisation, Attribution and Branding in Orthography.” Written Language and Literacy 18 (2): 208–227. doi:10.1075/wll.18.2.02seb.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, Paul. 2009. “Stereo Types.” Print Magazine. https://www.printmag.com/post/stereo_types.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzmüller, Jürgen. 2007. “Graphisches Crossing. Eine soziolinguistische Analyse graphostilistischer Variation.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 35 (3): 397–418. doi:10.1515/zgl.2007.026.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzmüller, Jürgen. 2009. “Typographisches Wissen. Die Oberfläche als Semiotische Ressource.” In Oberfläche und Performanz: Untersuchungen zur Sprache als dynamischer Gestalt, edited by Helmuth Feilke, and Angelika Linke, 259–286. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi:10.1515/9783484971240.4.459.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzmüller, Jürgen. 2012. “Floating Ideologies: Metamorphoses of Graphic ‘Germanness’.” In Orthography as Social Action, edited by Alexandra Jaffe, Jannis Androutsopoulos, Mark Sebba, and Sally Johnson, 255–288. doi:10.1515/9781614511038.255.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzmüller, Jürgen. 2013. Graphische Variation als soziale Praxis. Eine soziolinguistische Theorie skripturaler “Sichtbarkeit”. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110334241.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzmüller, Jürgen. 2015. “Graphic Variation and Ideologies: A Metapragmatic Approach.” Social Semiotics 25 (2): 126–141. doi:10.1080/10350330.2015.1010323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzmüller, Jürgen. 2016a. “Schrift als materielles, soziales und ideologisches Phänomen.” In Angemessenheit. Einsichten in Sprachgebräuche, edited by Jürgen Schiewe, 97–110. Göttingen: Wallstein.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzmüller, Jürgen. 2016b. “Typographie – Sprache als Schriftbild.” In Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext, edited by Nina-Maria Klug, and Hartmut Stöckl, 99–120. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110296099-005.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzmüller, Jürgen. 2018. “Multimodalität und Materialität im Diskurs.” In Handbuch Diskurs, edited by Ingo H. Warnke, 521–540. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110296075-022.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzmüller, Jürgen. Forthcoming. “Typographie und soziale Praxis.” In Typographie: Disziplinäre Zugänge – Fachliche Konzeptionierungen – Forschungsfragen und Projekte, edited by Ursula Rautenberg, and Anja Voeste. Stuttgart: Hiersemann.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzmüller, Jürgen, and Ingo H. Warnke. 2011. “Discourse as a ‘Linguistic Object’: Methodical and Methodological Delimitations.” Critical Discourse Studies 8 (2): 75–94. doi:10.1080/17405904.2011.558680.
   Google Scholar
• Stöckl, Hartmut. 2005. “Typography: Body and Dress of a Text – A Signing Mode Between Language and Image.” Visual Communication 4 (2): 204–214. doi:10.1177/1470357205053403.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, Paul. 2015. “Writing System Mimicry in the Linguistic Landscape.” SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 17: 147–167.
   Google Scholar
• Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa. 2007. “Metapragmatic Utterances in Computer-mediated Interaction.” In Metapragmatics in Use, edited by Wolfram Bublitz, and Axel Hübler, 87–106. doi:10.1075/pbns.165.07tan.
   Google Scholar
• Weingarten, Rüdiger. 2011. “Comparative Graphematics.” Written Language and Literacy 14 (1): 12–38. doi:10.1075/wll.14.1.02wei.
   Google Scholar
• Willberg, Hans Peter, and Friedrich Forssman. 2010. Lesetypografie. 5th ed. Mainz: Hermann Schmidt.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Jeff. 2012. “Is Your Font Racist?” The Wall Street Journal. https://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2012/06/20/is-your-business-font-racist/.
   Google Scholar