Towards a unified affordance approach: searching for congruent meaning making in COVID-19 warning designs

References

• Anderson, J. D., and J. K. Hodgins. 2005. “Perceiving Human Motion in Synthesized Images.” In Moving Image Theory: Ecological Considerations, edited by J. D. Anderson and B. Fischer Anderson, 61–66. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Björkvall, A., S. van Meerbergen, and G. Westberg. 2020. “Feeling Safe While Being Surveilled: The Spatial Semiotics of Affect at International Airports.” Social Semiotics: 1–23. doi:10.1080/10350330.2020.1790801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremner, C., and M. Roxburgh. 2015. “A Photograph is Evidence of Nothing but Itself.” In The Routledge Companion to Design Research, edited by Paul A. Rodgers and Joyce Yee, 203–214. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carello, C., J. B. Wagman, and M. T. Turvey. 2005. “Acoustic Specification of Object Properties.” In Moving Image Theory: Ecological Considerations, edited by J. D. Anderson and B. Fischer Anderson, 79–103. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., and R. E. Mayer. 2016. E-learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. 4th ed. Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dressler, R. 2015. “Signgeist: Promoting Bilingualism Through the Linguistic Landscape of School Signage.” International Journal of Multilingualism 12 (1): 128–145. doi:10.1080/14790718.2014.912282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P. E. 2018. “Videography as Design Nexus: Critical Inquiries into the Affordances and Efficacies of Live-Action Video Instructions.” PhD diss., Mälardalen University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P. E., and Eriksson, Y. 2019. “Live-action Communication Design: A Technical How-to Video Case Study.” Technical Communication Quarterly. 10.1080/10572252.2018.1528388
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. K., K. E. Pearce, J. Vitak, and J. W. Treem. 2017. “Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22 (1): 35–52. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forceville, C., and J. Kjeldsen. 2018. “The Affordances and Constraints of Situation and Genre: Visual and Multimodal Rhetoric in Unusual Traffic Signs.” International Review of Pragmatics 10 (2): 158–178. doi:10.1163/18773109-01002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frascara, J. 2015. “What Is Information Design?” In Information Design as Principled Action. Making Information Accessible, Relevant, Understandable, and Usable, edited by J. Frascara, 5–55. Champaign: Common Ground Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. 1977. “The Theory of Affordances.” In Perceiving, Acting and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, edited by R. Shaw and J. Brandsford, 62–82. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. J., and A. D. Pick. 2000. An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1998. “Risk Society: The Context of British Politics.” In Politics of Risk Society, edited by J. Franklin, 23–24. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, E. B. 1981. “The Ecology of J. J. Gibson’s Perception.” Leonardo 14 (3): 191–195. doi:10.2307/1574269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorter, D. 2006. “Further Possibilities for Linguistic Landscape Research.” In Linguistic Landscape – A New Approach to Multilingualism, edited by D. Gorter, 81–89. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Gorter, D. 2013. “Linguistic Landscapes in a Multilingual World.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 33: 190–212. doi:10.1017/S0267190513000020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorter, D. 2014. “Linguistic Landscape Studies.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by J. Verscheuren and J-O Östman, Vol. 18, 1–34. doi:10.1075/hop.18.lin2.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hartson, H. R. 2003. “Cognitive, Physical, Sensory, and Functional Affordances in Interaction Design.” Behaviour & Information Technology 22 (5): 315–338. doi:10.1080/01449290310001592587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworska, S., and A. Nanda. 2018. “Doing Well by Talking Good: A Topic Modelling-Assisted Discourse Study of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Applied Linguistics 39 (3): 373–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., and K. Leder Mackley. 2018. “Methodological Dialogues Across Multimodality and Sensory Ethnography: Digital Touch Communication.” Qualitative Research 19 (1): 90–110. doi:10.1177/1468794118796992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2003. Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality. A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensson, P., N. Laninge, J. H. Blom, and E. Wästlund. 2020. “Klisterlappar ändrar inte folks smittsamma beteende.” [Stickers Do Not Change People’s Contagious Behaviour.]. Dagens Nyheter, November 8.
   Google Scholar
• Landry, R., and R. Y. Bourhis. 1997. “Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality: An Empirical Study.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16: 23–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledin, P. 2015. “Listans och Tabellens Semiotik.” [The Semiotics of the List and the Table.] Sakprosa 7 (1): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ledin, P., and D. Machin. 2016. “A Discourse-Design Approach to Multimodality: The Visual Communication of Neoliberal Management Discourse.” Social Semiotics 26 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledin, P., and D. Machin. 2018. Doing Visual Analysis. from Theory to Practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, D. 2016. “The Need for a Social and Affordance-Driven Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies.” Discourse & Society 27 (3): 322–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mautner, G. 2012. “Language, Space and the Law: A Study of Directive Signs.” Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 19 (2): 189–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. 2005. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. T. 2005. What Do Pictures Want? Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Olander, J., E. Ronchi, R. Lovreglio, and D. Nilsson. 2017. “Dissuasive Exit Signage for Building Fire Evacuation.” Applied Ergonomics 59: 84–93. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, S. W. 2010. “A Picture Held us Captive: The Later Wittgenstein on Visual Argumentation.” Cogency 2 (2): 105–134.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, C., K. Chatralia, D. Damesick, S. Hobden, and L. Volpe. 2015. “Behavioural Insights in Health Care.” The Health Foundation. www.health.org.uk/publication/behavioural-insights-health-care.
   Google Scholar
• Ravelli, L. J., and R. J. McMurtrie. 2016. Multimodality in the Built Environment. Spatial Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, E. S. 1988. James J. Gibson and the Psychology of Perception. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., S. K. Evans, K. E. Pearce, A. Sivunen, J. Vitak, and J. W. Treem. 2017a. “Organizational Media Affordances: Operationalization and Associations with Media Use.” Journal of Communication 67 (1): 106–130. doi:10.1111/jcom.12273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., S. K. Evans, K. E. Pearce, A. Sivunen, J. Vitak, and J. W. Treem. 2017b. “Organizational Media Affordances: Operationalization and Associations with Media use.” Journal of Communication 67 (1): 106–130. doi:10.1111/jcom.12273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royce, T. D. 2007. “Intersemiotic Complementarity: A Framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis.” In New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse, edited by T. D. Royce and W. L. Bower, 63–109. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R., and S. Wong Scollon. 2003. Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stenglin, M. K. 2009. “Space Odyssey: Towards a Social Semiotic Model of Three-Dimensional Space.” Visual Communication 8 (1): 35–64. doi 10.1177/1470357208099147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., P. Ayres, and S. Kalyuga. 2011. Cognitive Load Theory. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Swenberg, T., and P. E. Eriksson. 2018. “Effects of Continuity or Discontinuity in Actual Film Editing.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 36 (2): 222–246. doi:10.1177/0276237417744590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, E. S. 2005. “Three Views on Facial Expression and Its Understanding in the Cinema.” In Moving Image Theory: Ecological Considerations, edited by B. F. Anderson and D. Bordwell, 107–127. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., J. B. Morrisson, and M. Betrancourt. 2002. “Animation: Can It Facilitate?” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 57 (4): 247–262. doi:10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voloshinov, V. 1973. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wogalter, M. S., and C. B. Mayhorn. 2017. “Warning Design.” In Information Design. Research and Practice, edited by A. Black, P. Luna, O. Lund, and S. Walker, 331–348. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar