The patent price of market access in the AUSFTA

References

• Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2007. Patterns of Innovation in Australian Businesses 2005. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra. ( Cat. No. 8163 .0).
   Google Scholar
• Branstetter, L. G., C. Chatterjee, and M. Higgins. 2011. Regulation and Welfare: Evidence from Paragraph IV Generic Entry in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Working Paper 17188. http://www.nber.org/papers/w17188
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, S., C. Park, and K. M. Gopakumar. 2010. Five Years into the Product Patent Regime: India’s Response. New York: UNDP http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s17761en/s17761en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P. 2001. “BITs and BIPs Bilateralism in Intellectual Property.” The Journal of World Intellectual Property 4 (6): 791–808. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1796.2001.tb00138.x.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P. 2002. Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, A. 2011. “From Free Entry to Patent Protection: Welfare Implications for the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (1): 160–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, S., B. K. Baker, M. Kaminski, and J. Koo. 2012. “The U.S. Proposal for an Intellectual Property Chapter in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement.” American University International Law Review 28 (1): 105–202.
   Google Scholar
• FTC. 2003. To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission (US).
   Google Scholar
• Harper, I., P. Anderson, S. McCluskey, and M. O’Bryan. 2015. Competition Policy Review. Final Report. http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/files/2015/03/Competition-policy-review-report_online.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harris, T., D. Nicol, and N. Gruen. 2013. Pharmaceutical Patents Review Report. http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/pdfs/2013-05-27_PPR_Final_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holovac, M. A. 2004. “A Balancing Act in the United States Drug Industry: Pioneer and Generic Drugs, the Orange Book, Marketing Protection and the US Consumer.” World Patent Information 26: 123–129.
   Google Scholar
• IFAC. 2004. The U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement (FTA). The Intellectual Property Provisions. http://www.ustr.gov/archive/assets/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Australia_FTA/Reports/asset_upload_file813_3398.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IP Australia. 2013. Australian Intellectual Property Report 2013. http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/pdfs/Australian_IP_Report_2013-web_version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IPAC. 1984. Patents, Innovation and Competition in Australia. Canberra: Industrial Property Advisory Committee. https://web.archive.org/web/20120227072854/http://www.acip.gov.au/library/Patents,%20Innovation%20and%20Competition%20in%20Australia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IPCRC. 2000. Review of Intellectual Property Legislation Under the Competition Principles Agreement: Final Report, Attorney-General’s Department (Intellectual Property and Competition Review Committee). http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/pdfs/ipcr/finalreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., and J. Lerner. 2004. Innovation and its Discontents: How Our Broken Patents System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do about It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, W. 2004. “Why Harmonization is a Trojan Horse.” European Intellectual Property Review 26 (10): 447–460.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, C. 2007. “Evolution of ‘Inventive Step’-like Elements in Australian Patent Laws.” Australian Intellectual Property Journal 18: 130–148.
   Google Scholar
• López, A. 2009. “Innovation and Appropriability: Empirical Evidence and Research Agenda.” In The Economics of Intellectual Property: Suggestions for Further Research in Developing Countries and Economies in Transition, edited by 1–32. WIPO. http://www.wipo.int/ip-development/en/economics/
   Google Scholar
• Moir, H. V. J. 2013a. Patent Policy and Innovation: Do Legal Rules Deliver Effective Economic Outcomes? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Moir, H. V. J. 2013b. “Fabricating Invention: The Patent Malfunction of Australian Patent Law.” Agenda 20 (2): 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Moir, H. V. J. 2014. “Trade Treaties and Patent Policy: Searching for a Balanced Approach.” Presented at 15th International Schumpeter Society Conference, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany, July 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Moir, H. V. J., and L. Palombi. 2013. “Patents and Trademarks: Empirical Evidence on ‘Evergreening’ from Australia.” Presented at 4th Asia-Pacific Innovation Conference, National Taiwan University, Taipei, December 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Neuwelt, P. M., D. H. Gleeson, and B. Mannering. 2015. “Patently Obvious: A Public Health Analysis of Pharmaceutical Industry Statements on the Trans-Pacific Partnership International Trade Agreement.” Critical Public Health. doi:10.1080/09581596.2015.1022510
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. 2010. Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements. Productivity Commission Research Report. http://www.pc.gov.au/ic/inquiry/44randd
   Google Scholar
• Quillen Jr., C. D. 2006. “Innovation and the U.S. Patent System.” Virginia Law and Business Review 1: 210–225.
   Google Scholar
• Sell, S. K. 2003. Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sell, S. K. 2011. “TRIPs Was Never Enough: Vertical Forum Shifting, FTAS, ACTA, and TPP.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law 18: 447–478.
   Google Scholar
• Thambisetty, S. 2009. Legal Transplants in Patent Law: Why Utility is the New Industrial Applicability. LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 6/2008.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherall, K. 2015. “The Australia-US Free Trade Agreement’s Impact on Australia’s Copyright Trade Policy.” Australian Journal of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar