Aid for trade and ecologically sustainable development in Australia’s international aid program

References

• ACFID (Australian Council for International Development). 2016. From Policy to Action: Australian Aid and the Sustainable Development Goals. Deakin: ACFID.
   Google Scholar
• AusAID (Australian Agency for International Development). 2006. Australian Aid: Promoting Growth and Stability? A White Paper on the Australian Government’s Overseas Aid Program. Canberra: AusAID.
   Google Scholar
• AusAID (Australian Agency for International Development). 2013. AusAID Annual Report 2012–2013. Canberra: AusAID.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 1992. National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development. https://www.environment.gov.au/about-us/esd/publications/national-esd-strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2014. “ Australia Launches Global Trade Facility.” Joint Media Release, The Hon. Julie Bishop MP, Minister for Foreign Affairs, and The Hon. Andrew Robb AO MP, Minister for Trade and Investment, July 17. http://foreignminister.gov.au/releases/Pages/2014/jb_mr_140717b.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• “Australian Government Criticised over AusAID Merger.” 2013. ABC News, September 19. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-19/an-ausaid-merger-reaction/4966976.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, Julie. 2015. “ Question Time—Foreign Aid.” May 14. http://foreignminister.gov.au/transcripts/Pages/2015/jb_tr_150514.aspx?ministerid=4.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, Jack, and Sinclair Dinnen. 2016. “Examining Recent Shifts in Australia’s Foreign aid Policy: New Paradigm or More Incremental Change?” Australian Journal of International Affairs 70 (1): 87–103. doi: 10.1080/10357718.2015.1085955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, Giorel, and Robyn Hollander. 2015. “25 Years of Ecologically Sustainable Development in Australia: Paradigm Shift or Business as Usual?” Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 22 (1): 2–6. doi: 10.1080/14486563.2014.999728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DFAT (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade). 2014a. Australian Aid: Promoting Prosperity, Reducing Poverty, Enhancing Stability. Canberra: DFAT.
   Google Scholar
• DFAT (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade). 2014b. Making Performance Count: Enhancing the Accountability and Effectiveness of Australian Aid. Canberra: DFAT.
   Google Scholar
• DFAT (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade). 2014c. Environmental Protection Policy for the Aid Program. Canberra: DFAT.
   Google Scholar
• DFAT (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade). 2015a. Strategy for Australia’s Aid for Trade Investments: Supporting Developing Countries to Trade and Prosper. Canberra: DFAT.
   Google Scholar
• DFAT (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade). 2015b. Annual Report 2014–2015. Canberra: DFAT.
   Google Scholar
• DFAT (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade). n.d. a. “Environmental Goods Agreement.” Accessed November 2, 2016. http://dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/environmental-goods-agreement/Pages/environmental-goods-agreement.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• DFAT (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade). n.d. b. “ Environmental Principle 1: Do No Harm.” DFAT Good Practice Note. https://dfat.gov.au/aid/topics/safeguards-risk-management/environmental-protection/Documents/environmental-protection-good-practice-note-1-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, David. 2014. “Australian Aid Program ‘Haemorrhaging Skills’ after DFAT Merger.” The Mandarin, July 14. http://www.themandarin.com.au/566-australian-aid-program-haemorrhaging-skills-dfat-merger/.
   Google Scholar
• Edenhofer, Ottmar, Johannes Wallacher, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Michael Reder, Brigitte Knopf, and Johannes Muller. 2012. Climate Change, Justice and Sustainability: Linking Climate and Development Policy. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fairtrade (Fairtrade Australia New Zealand). 2015. “ Delivering the Sustainable Development Goals through Trade—A Five Point Agenda for Policy Coherence.” http://fairtrade.com.au/en-au/fairtrade-in-action/creating-sustainable-change.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, Francisco H. G., and Maria Ana Lugo. 2013. “Multidimensional Poverty Analysis: Looking for a Middle Ground.” World Bank Research Observer 28 (2): 220–235. doi: 10.1093/wbro/lks013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goff, Patricia M. 2015. The Environmental Goods Agreement: A Piece of the Puzzle. CIGI Papers No. 72. Waterloo. ON: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Janet. 2012. “Aid and Development.” In International Development: Issues and Challenges. 2nd ed., edited by Damien Kingsbury, John McKay, Janet Hunt, Mark McGillivray, and Matthew Clarke, 79–111. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• ICTSD (International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development). 2013. Assessing the Effectiveness of Aid for Trade: Lessons from the Ground. Geneva: ICTSD.
   Google Scholar
• Khatun, Fahmida, Samina Hossain, and Nepoleon Dewan. 2013. Evaluating Aid for Trade: On the Ground Lessons from Bangladesh. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• Kilby, Patrick. 2007. “The Australian Aid Program: Dealing with Poverty?” Australian Journal of International Affairs 61 (1): 114–129. doi: 10.1080/10357710601142534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krantz, Lasse. 2001. The Sustainable Livelihood Approach to Poverty Reduction: An Introduction. Division for Policy and Socio-Economic Analysis, Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Lammersen, Frans, and William Hynes. 2016. Aid for Trade and the Sustainable Development Agenda: Strengthening Synergies. OECD Development Policy Papers No. 5. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Langan, Mark, and James Scott. 2014. “The Aid for Trade Charade.” Cooperation and Conflict 49 (2): 143–161. doi: 10.1177/0010836713482880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowy Institute for International Policy. n.d. “ Australian Foreign Aid.” https://www.lowyinstitute.org/issues/australian-foreign-aid.
   Google Scholar
• McCawley, Peter. 2006. “Aid versus Trade: Some Considerations.” Australian Economic Review 39 (1): 89–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8462.2006.00400.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs). 2012. Evaluation of Aid for Trade. Tokyo: MOFA.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2010. “Trading out of Poverty: How Aid for Trade Can Help.” OECD Journal on Development 10 (2): 7–41. doi: 10.1787/journal_dev-v10-art16-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD and WTO (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and World Trade Organization). 2015. Aid for Trade at a Glance 2015: Reducing Trade Costs for Inclusive, Sustainable Growth. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Page, Sheila, ed. 2006. Trade and Aid: Partners or Rivals in Development Policy? London: Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Plan International. 2016. “ Federal Budget Submission 2016-2017.” https://www.plan.org.au/~/media/plan/documents/resources/final_plan_budget_submission050216.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Prentis, Henning Webb. 1953. “Trade not Aid.” Challenge 1 (7): 38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Redclift, Michael, and Delyse Springett, eds. 2015. Routledge International Handbook of Sustainable Development. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser, Andrew. 2008. “Neo-liberalism and the Politics of Australian Aid Policy-making.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 62 (3): 372–385. doi: 10.1080/10357710802286825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser, Andrew. 2015. “Asia's Rise and the Politics of Australian Aid Policy.” The Pacific Review 10 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Andrew Charlton. 2006. “Aid for Trade.” International Journal of Development Issues 5 (2): 1–41. doi: 10.1108/eb045861
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). 2013. A New Global Partnership: Eradicate Poverty and Transform Economies through Sustainable Development. Report of the High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda. New York: UN.
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). 2015a. Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development. New York: UN.
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). 2015b. “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” Resolution A/RES/70/1, adopted on September 25, 2015. New York: UN.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2013. Fast Facts: Poverty Reduction and UNDP. New York: UN.
   Google Scholar
• WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WTO (World Trade Organization). 2006. Recommendations of the Task Force on Aid for Trade. Document WT/AFT/1. Geneva: WTO.
   Google Scholar