Going global: a future for Australian International Relations

References

• Abbondanza, G. 2021. “Australia the ‘Good International Citizen’? The Limits of a Traditional Middle Power.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 75 (2): 178–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. 2014. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 58 (4): 647–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, R., and A. Zarakol. 2021. “Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of Its Discontents.” International Organization 75 (Special Issue 2): 611–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agius, C., and A. Mundkur. 2020. “The Australian Foreign Policy White Paper, Gender and Conflict Prevention: Ties That Don’t Bind.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 74 (3): 282–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., and M. Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartelson, J. 2013. “Three Concepts of Recognition.” International Theory 5 (1): 107–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, M. 2011. “Can Australia Save the World? The Limits and Possiblities of Middle Power Diplomacy.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 65 (5): 563–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buthe, T., and W. Mattli. 2011. The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, A. 2014. “Is Australia a Middle Power? A Systematic Impact Approach.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 68 (1): 70–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claude, I. 1966. “Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations.” International Organization 20 (3): 367–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2017. 2017 Foreign Policy White Paper: Opportunity, Security, Strength. Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. 1997. Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers after the Cold War. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., R. A. Higgott, and K. R. Nossal. 1993. Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a Changing World. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A., V. Thakur, and P. Vale. 2020. The Imperial Discipline: Race and the Founding of International Relations. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, B. 2019. “Teaching Australian Foreign Policy: Introduction to the Special Section.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 73 (6): 505–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, C., T. Lindemann, and O. J. Sending. 2018. “Frustrated Sovereigns: The Agency That Makes the World Go Around.” Review of International Studies 44 (5): 787–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, S. 2011. Australia in International Politics: An Introduction to Australian Foreign Policy. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, G. 2019. Framing the Islands: Power and Diplomatic Agency in Pacific Regionalism. Camberra: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D. 2007. Business Power in Global Governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• George, N. 2019. “Gender, Security and Australia’s 2018 Pacific Pivot: Stalled Impetus and Shallow Roots.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 73 (3): 213–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Go, J., and G. Lawson, eds. 2017. Global Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, E. 2013. The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy, and Transition in Post-Cold War East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, G. 1984. The ‘Standard of Civilization’ in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gyngell, A., and M. Wesley. 2007. Making Australan Foreign Policy. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. 2003. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Houndsmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, V. M., and B. S. Day. 2020. Foreign Policy Analysis. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, M.-K. 2015. Beneath the Surface of White Supremacy. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. J. 2015. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keal, P. 2003. European Conquest and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazower, M. 2009. No Enchanted Palace: The End of Empire and the Ideological Origins of the United Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, D. 2009. “Foreign Policy Studies in Australia.” Australian Journal of Politics and History 55 (3): 375–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenbesser, L. 2013. “The 2012 TRIP Survey of International Relations in Australia: One Problem to Rule Us All.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 67 (3): 218–233.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt, L. 2014. “The Women, Peace and Security Agenda: Australia and the Agency of Girls.” Australian Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 486–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, C. 2003. “International Relations.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Social Sciences in Australia, edited by S. D. Ian McAllister, and Riaz Hassan, 358–373. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, C. 2013. Individual Rights and the Making of the International System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, C. 2020. International Relations: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ringmar, E. 2002. “The Recognition Game: Soviet Russia against the West.” Cooperation and Conflict 37 (2): 115–136.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. G. 1983. “Continuity and Transformatin in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis.” International Organization 35 (2): 261–285.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. G. 1993. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.” International Organization 47 (1): 139–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabaratnam, M. 2020. “Is IR Theory White? Racialized Subject-Positioning in Three Canonical Texts.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, first view.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, L. J., and J. True. 2014. “The Women, Peace and Security Agenda and Australian Leadership in the World: From Rhetoric to Commitment.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 68 (3): 257–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strating, R., and J. K. Westendorf. 2020. “Introduction: A Critical Analysis of Australian Foreign, Defence and Strategic Policy.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 74 (3): 208–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayanagi, M. 2018. “Women and the Vote: The Parliamentary Path to Equal Franchise, 1918-28.” Parliamentary History 37 (1): 168–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitalis, R. 2015. White World Order, Black Power Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wight, M. 1966. “Why Is There No International Theory?” In Diplomatic Investigations, edited by H. Butterfield, and M. Wight, 17–34. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, T. 2017. “Australia and Middle Power Approaches to Asia Pacific Regionalism.” Australian Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 110–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar