Middle-power behaviours: Australia’s status-quoist/Lockean and Indonesia’s reformist/Kantian approaches to crises of legitimacy in the Indo-Pacific

References

• Abbondanza, Gabriele. 2021. “Australia the ‘Good International Citizen’? The Limits of a Traditional Middle Power.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 75 (2): 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2020.1831436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbondanza, Gabriele. 2022. “Whither the Indo-Pacific? Middle Power Strategies from Australia, South Korea and Indonesia.” International Affairs 98 (2): 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, Amitav. 2017. “After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order.” Ethics and International Affairs 31 (3): 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1017/S089267941700020X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, Amitav. 2021. ASEAN and Regional Order: Revisiting Security Community in Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anwar, Dewi Fortuna. 2020. “Indonesia and the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific.” International Affairs 96 (1): 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar, Dewi Fortuna. 2023. “Indonesia’s Hedging Plus Policy in the Face of China’s Rise and the US-China Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific Region.” Pacific Review 36 (2): 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2022.2160794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations). 2019. ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific. https://asean.org/asean2020/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ASEAN-Outlook-on-the-Indo-Pacific_FINAL_22062019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, Mark, and Richard Higgott. 2013. “The Changing Architecture of Politics in the Asia-Pacific: Australia’s Middle Power Moment?” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 14: 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lct016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behringer, Ronald M. 2013. “The Dynamics of Middlepowermanship.” Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 14 (2): 9–22. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/dynamics-middlepowermanship/docview/1519491995/se-2?accountid=10382.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, Jacob. 2022. “Canada’s Cross-Pacific Relations: From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific.” International Journal 77 (1): 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207020221116777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon, Hoo Tiang, and Sarah Teo. 2022. “Caught in the Middle? Middle Powers amid U.S.-China Competition.” Asia Policy 17 (4): 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2022.0058.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, Andrew. 2014. “Is Australia a Middle Power? A Systemic Impact Approach.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 68 (1): 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2013.840264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2017. 2017 Foreign Policy White Paper. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/2017-foreign-policy-white-paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2023. National Defence: Defence Strategic Review. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.defence.gov.au/about/reviews-inquiries/defence-strategic-review.
   Google Scholar
• Dannhauer, Pia. 2022. “Elite Role Conceptions and Indonesia’s Agency in the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific: Reclaiming Leadership.” Pacific Review, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2022.2125999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efstathopoulos, Charalampos. 2023. “Global IR and the Middle Power Concept: Exploring Different Paths to Agency.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 77 (2): 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2023.2191925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, Evelyn. 2007. “Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies.” International Security 32 (3): 113–157. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2008.32.3.113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Andrew, and Matthew Doran. 2023. “Australian Nuclear Submarine Program to Cost up to $368b as AUKUS Details Unveiled in the US.” Australian Broadcasting Corporation, March 14. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-03-14/aukus-nuclear-submarine-deal-announced/102087614.
   Google Scholar
• Hellyer, Marcus. 2023. “Defence Budget 2023-24IF – Nervous Times Ahead.” Australian Defence Magazine, June 12. https://www.australiandefence.com.au/defence/budget-policy/defence-budget-2023-24-nervous-times-ahead#:~:text=The%20annual%20defence%20budget%20has,years%20of%20the%20forward%20estimates.
   Google Scholar
• IISS (International Institute for Strategic Studies). 2023. “Australia’s 2023 Defence Strategic Review.” Accessed September 16, 2023. https://www.iiss.org/en/publications/strategic-comments/2023/australias-2023-defence-strategic-review/#:~:text=Australia's%202023%20Defence%20Strategic%20Review%20provides%20a%20blueprint%20for%20building,the%20threat%20posed%20by%20China.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. John. 2009. “Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Job, Brian L. 2020. “Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Dilemmas of Middle Powers.” Issues and Studies. Institute of International Relations 56 (2): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1142/S10132.51120400081.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2019. “China in a World of Orders: Rethinking Compliance and Challenge in Beijing’s International Relations.” International Security 44 (2): 9–60. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordaan, Eduard. 2003. “The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations: Distinguishing between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers.” Politikon 30 (1): 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0258934032000147282.
   Google Scholar
• Jordaan, Eduard. 2018. “Faith No More: Reflections on the Distinctions between Traditional and Emerging Middle Powers.” In Rethinking Middle Powers in the Asian Century: New Theories, New Cases, edited by Tanguy Struye de Swielande, Dorothée Vandamme, David Walton, and Thomas Wilkins, 111–121. Milton: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, Sung Chul, Jaehyon Lee, and Ji-Yong Lee. 2021. “The Indo-Pacific Strategy and US Alliance Network Expandability: Asian Middle Powers’ Positions on Sino-US Geostrategic Competition in Indo-Pacific Region.” Journal of Contemporary China 30 (127): 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2020.1766909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koga, Kei. 2020. “Japan’s ‘Indo-Pacific’ Question: Countering China or Shaping a New Regional Order?.” International Affairs 96 (1): 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuik, Cheng-Chwee. 2022. “Hedging via Institutions: ASEAN-Led Multilateralism in the Age of the Indo-Pacific.” Asian Journal of Peacebuilding 10 (2): 355–386. https://doi.org/10.18588/202211.00a319.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Bo. 2020. “China’s Fragmented Approach toward the Indo-Pacific Strategy: One Concept, Many Lenses.” China Review 20 (3): 177–204. https://muse.jhu.edu/related_content?type=article&id=764075.
   Google Scholar
• MFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia). 2023. “Indonesian Foreign Minister: Indo-Pacific is not a Battle Ground.” July 14. https://kemlu.go.id/portal/en/read/4971/berita/indonesian-foreign-minister-indo-pacific-is-not-a-battle-ground.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Indonesia. 2015. Defence White Paper. 3rd ed. Jakarta: Ministry of Defence of The Republic of Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Mustapha, Jennifer. 2023. “Rethinking Canada’s Security Interests in Southeast Asia: From ‘Asia-Pacific’ to ‘Indo-Pacific’.” Canadian Foreign Policy Journal x: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2023.2203936.
   Google Scholar
• Natalegawa, Marty. 2013. “An Indonesian Perspective on the Indo-Pacific.” The Jakarta Post, May 20. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/05/20/an-indonesian-perspective-indo-pacific.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan, Rajesh. 2020. “Evasive Balancing: India’s Unviable Indo-Pacific Strategy.” International Affairs 96 (1): 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenhill, John. 1998. “Cycles of Middle Power Activism: Constraint and Choice in Australian and Canadian Foreign Policies.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 52 (3): 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357719808445259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, Christian. 2007. “International Crises of Legitimacy.” International Politics 44 (2-3): 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800182.
   Google Scholar
• Roy-Chaudhury, Rahul, and Kate Sullivan de Estrada. 2018. “India, the Indo-Pacific and the Quad.” Survival 60 (3): 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2018.1470773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saptohutomo, Aryo Putranto. 2023. “Menhan Prabowo Diminta Selesaikan Buku Putih Pertahanan Ketimbang Orkestrasi Intelijen.” Kompas, April 3. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2023/04/03/23032591/menhan-prabowo-diminta-selesaikan-buku-putih-pertahanan-ketimbang-orkestrasi.
   Google Scholar
• Shekhar, Vibhanshu. 2022. “Indonesia”s Great-Power Management in the Indo-Pacific: The Balancing Behavior of a ‘Dove State’.” Asia Policy 29 (4): 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2022.0062.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen, Matthew. 2013. “The Concept and Role of Middle Powers during Global Rebalancing.” Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 14 (2): 36–52. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/concept-role-middle-powers-during-global/docview/1622290539/se-2?accountid=10382.
   Google Scholar
• Strating, Rebecca. 2020. Policy Study 80: Defending the Maritime Rules- Based Order: Regional Responses to the South China Sea Disputes. Washington: East-west Center. https://www.eastwestcenter.org/publications/defending-the-maritime-rules-based-order-regional-responses-the-south-china-sea.
   Google Scholar
• Struye de Swielande, Tanguy. 2018. “Middle Powers: A Comprehensive Definition and Typology.” In Rethinking Middle Powers in the Asian Century: New Theories, New Cases, edited by Tanguy Struye de Swielande, Dorothée Vandamme, David Walton, and Thomas Wilkins, 19–31. Milton: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Suryadinata, Leo. 2018. “Indonesia and Its Stance on the ‘Indo-Pacific’.” ISEAS Perspective 66, October 23. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/[email protected].
   Google Scholar
• Tan, See Seng. 2020. “Consigned to Hedge: South-East Asia and America’s ‘Free and Open Indo-Pacific’ Strategy.” International Affairs 96 (1): 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Brendan. 2020. “Is Australia’s Indo-Pacific Strategy an Illusion?” International Affairs 96 (1): 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, Sarah. 2022. “Toward a Differentiation-Based Framework for Middle Power Behavior.” International Theory 14 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thies, Cameron G., and Agguntari C. Sari. 2018. “A Role Theory Approach to Middle Powers: Making Sense of Indonesia’s Place in the International System.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 40 (3): 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs40-3c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, Joanne. 2020. “‘Is It Time for Australia to Adopt a ‘Free and Open’ Middle-Power Foreign Policy?” Asia Policy 27 (4): 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2020.0053.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, Joanne, Sujan R. Chinoy, Natalie Sambhi, and Jeffrey Reeves. 2020. “A Free and Open Indo-Pacific: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Opportunities for Engagement.” Asia Policy 27 (4): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2020.0051.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherbee, Donald E. 2019. “ASEAN, and the Indo-Pacific Cooperation Concept ISEAS Perspective No.47.” Indonesia, June 7. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS_Perspective_2019_47.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Widmaier, Wesley M. 2019. “Australian Foreign Policy in Political Time: Middle Power Creativity, Misplaced Friendships, and Crises of Leadership.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 73 (2): 143–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2019.1570486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, Thomas, and Jiye Kim. 2022. “Adoption, Accommodation or Opposition? – Regional Powers Respond to American-Led Indo-Pacific Strategy.” Pacific Review 35 (3): 415–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2020.1825516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, Christian, and Nicole Jenne. 2022. “Filling the Void: The Asia-Pacific Problem of Order and Emerging Indo-Pacific Regional Multilateralism.” Contemporary Security Policy 43 (2): 213–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2036506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Florence. 2019. “Asymmetrical Interdependence and Sanction: China’s Economic Retaliation over South Korea’s THAAD Deployment.” Issues and Studies. Institute of International Relations 55 (4): 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1142/S10132.51119400083.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, Xianghong, and Shaowen Zhang. 2021. “From “Asia Pacific” to “Indo Pacific”: The Adjustment of American Asia Pacific Strategy from the Perspective of Critical Geopolitics.” East Asian Affairs 1 (02): 2150009. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2737557921500091.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Feng. 2019. “China’s Curious Nonchalance towards the Indo-Pacific.” Survival 61 (3): 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2019.1614791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar