Political Dynasties in Thailand: The Recent Picture after the 2011 General Election

References

• 10 dtra-goon nak-kanmueang soon-pan lang saan sang bpra-haan 3 pak-111 a-deet TRT bpert baan rap perm 109 kon. Matichon, 4 December 2008. Retrieved from http://www.matichon.co.th/news_detail.php?newsid=1228307138&catid=01
   Google Scholar
• Albritton, R. B., & Thawilwadee, B. (2008). Developing democracy under a new constitution in Thailand. In Y.-H. Chu et al. (Eds.), How East Asians view democracy (pp. 114–138). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anek, L. (1988). Business and politics in Thailand: New patterns of influence. Asian Survey, 28(4), 451–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anucha, C. (2007, 25 December). Democrats in shock sweep in Chon Buri. Bangkok Post, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Anyarat, C. (2010). Thai electoral campaigning: Vote-canvassing networks and hybrid voting. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 29(4), 67–95.
   Google Scholar
• Asako, Y., Iida, T., Matsubayashi, T., & Ueda, M. (2012). Dynastic politicians: Theory and evidence from Japan. Waseda University Organization for Japan-US Studies Working Paper No. 201201. Retrieved from http://www.kikou.waseda.ac.jp/wojuss/achievements/working_paper/img/wp201201.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Askew, M. (2008). Performing political identity: The Democrat Party in Southern Thailand. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.
   Google Scholar
• Asquer, R., & Calderoni, F. (2011). Family matters: Testing the effect of political connections in Italy. Symposium: Democracy and its Development 2005–2011. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0fg580b9
   Google Scholar
• Avudh, P. (2009, 13 January). Thaksin’s popularity does not translate into votes. The Nation, 2B.
   Google Scholar
• Backman, M. (2004). The Asian insider: Unconventional wisdom for Asian business. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bowie, K. (2008). Standing in the shadows: Matrilocal power in electoral politics in rural Thailand. American Ethnologist, 35(1), 136–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A., & Hewison, K. (2005). Economics is the deciding factor: Labour politics in Thaksin’s Thailand. Pacific Affairs, 78(3), 353–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, W. A. (1998). Imagining democracy: Reading “The Events of May” in Thailand. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Camp, R. A. (1982). Family relationships in Mexican politics: A preliminary view. Journal of Politics, 44(3), 848–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camp, R. A. (1995). Political recruitment across two centuries: Mexico, 1884–1991. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Case, W. F. (1996). Can the “halfway house” stand? Semidemocracy and elite theory in three Southeast Asian countries. Comparative Politics, 28(4), 437–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai-anan, S. (1989). Thailand: A stable semi-democracy. In L. Diamond, J. J. Linz & S. M. Lipset (Eds.), Democracy in developing countries (Vol. III: Asia) (pp. 305–346). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, P., & Croissant, A. (2010). Intra-party democracy in Thailand. Asian Journal of Political Science, 18(2), 195–223.
   Google Scholar
• Chek bin dtra-goon kan-mueang dang baa-ra-mee woop sop-dtok soon-pan. Matichon Weekly, 11 February 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Clubok, A. B., Wilensky, N. M., & Berghorn, F. J. (1969). Family relationships, congressional recruitment, and political modernization. Journal of Politics, 31(4), 1035–1062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronel, S., Chua, Y. T., Rimban, L., & Cruz, B. B. (2007). The rulemakers: How the wealthy and the well-born dominate Congress. Quezon City: Center for Investigative Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Dal Bo, E., Dal Bo, P., & Snyder, J. (2009). Political dynasties. Review of Economic Studies, 76(1), 115–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan, M. (2003). Is there a ruling class in France? In M. Dogan (Ed.), Elite configurations at the apex of power (pp. 17–90). Amsterdam: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Dye, T. R., & Zeigler, H. (2006). The irony of democracy: An uncommon introduction to American politics (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein, B. D. (2010). The dynasty advantage: Family ties in Congressional elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 35(4), 571–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, P. (2011). India: A portrait. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Hedman, E., & Sidel, J. (2000). Philippine politics and society in the twentieth century: Colonial legacies, post-colonial trajectories. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, S. (1966). America’s political dynasties from Adams to Kennedy. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchcroft, P. (1998). Booty capitalism: The politics of banking in the Philippines. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ishibashi, M., & Reed, S. R. (1992). Second-generation Diet members and democracy in Japan: Hereditary seats. Asian Survey, 32(4), 366–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanokrat, L. (2012). The rise of the Octobrists: Power and conflict among former left wing student activists in contemporary Thai politics. Unpublished PhD thesis. London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Khien, T. (1997). Thailand in crisis: A study of the political turmoil of May 1992. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
   Google Scholar
• King Prajadhipok’s Institute. (2011). Bu-ra-na-kan ngan-wi-chai: Nak-kan-mueang-thin lae phue-ti-kam kan-leu-ktang. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kobkua, S.-P. (2003). Kings, country and constitutions: Thailand’s political development, 1932–2000. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H., & Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCargo, D., & Pathmanand, U. (2005). The Thaksinization of Thailand. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, A. (1994). Rent-seeking families and the Philippines state: A history of the Lopez family. In A. McCoy (Ed.), An anarchy of families: State and family in the Philippines (pp. 429–536). Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, R., Beja Jr., E. L., Venida, V. S., & Yap, D. (2012). An empirical analysis of political dynasties in the 15th Philippine Congress. Working Paper 12-001, Asian Institute of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mosca, G. (1939). The ruling class. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Nakharin, M. (1991). The economic base and power of modern Thai political parties. In E. Murashima, N. Mektrairat, & S. Wanthana (Eds.), The making of modern Thai political parties (pp. 55–87). Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies.
   Google Scholar
• Neher, C. D. (1988). Thailand in 1987: Semi-successful semi-democracy. Asian Survey, 28(2), 192–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. H. (2008). Thaksin’s 2005 electoral triumph: Looking back from the election in 2007. City University of Hong Kong, Southeast Asia Research Center Working Paper Series No. 68.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. H. (2013). Elite political culture in contemporary Thailand: Voters, Members of Parliament, and political parties in the debates of the 2007 Constitution Drafting Committee. City University of Hong Kong, Southeast Asia Research Center Working Paper Series No. 141.
   Google Scholar
• Nishizaki, Y. (2011). Political authority and provincial identity in Thailand: The making of Banharn-buri. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nopparat, W. (2012). Nak-kan-mueang-thin chang-wat Sakaeo. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ockey, J. (2003). Change and continuity in the Thai party system. Asian Survey, 43(4), 663–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ockey, J. (2004). Making democracy: Leadership, class, gender, and political participation in Thailand. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Election Commission of Thailand. (2011). Statistics on July 3, 2011 House of Representatives Election. Retrieved from http://www.ect.go.th/newweb/th/election/index4.php
   Google Scholar
• Orathai, K. (2002). Electoral politics in Thailand. In A. Croissant, G. Bruns, & M. John (Eds.), Electoral politics in Southeast and East Asia (pp. 277–297). Singapore: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Pasuk, P., & Baker, C. (1997). Power in transition: Thailand in the 1990s. In K. Hewison (Ed.), Political change in Thailand (pp. 21–41). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pasuk, P., & Baker, C. (2009). Thaksin (2nd expanded ed.). Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, K. (2004). American dynasty: Aristocracy, fortune, and the politics of deceit in the House of Bush. New York: Viking Adult.
   Google Scholar
• Prajak, K. (2014). The rise and fall of electoral violence in Thailand: Changing rules, structures and power landscapes, 1997–2011. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 36(3), 386–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pra-jak Kong-ki-ra-ti: naēo-nōm jet pra-kān lang leuak-tang sām ka-ra-ka-dā-khom. Prachathai, 20 July 2011. Retrieved from http://prachatai.com/journal/2011/07/36106
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1976). The comparative study of political elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Querubin, P. (2011). Political reform and elite persistence: Term limits on political dynasties in the Philippines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. (1996). The rise of the rural network politicians. Asian Survey, 36(9), 924–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, M. A. (2009). Political dynasties: Evidence from a natural experiment in Argentina. Working Paper Series, Universidad de San Andres, Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Rujaluckraya, K. (2010). Nak-kan-mueang-thin chang-wat Surat Thani. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Siripan, N. S. (2006). Thai political parties in the Age of Reform. Bangkok: Institute of Public Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Siripan, N. S. (2012). Thailand. In T. Inoguchi & J. Blondel (Eds.), Political parties and democracy: Contemporary Western Europe and Asia (pp. 143–164). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sombat, C. (2001). Local godfathers in Thai politics. In R. McVey (Ed.), Money and power in provincial Thailand (pp. 53–73). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stithorn, T. (2012). Political engagement and participation of Thai citizens: The rural-urban disparity. Contemporary Politics, 18(1), 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamada, Y. (1991). Itthiphon and Amnat: An informal aspect of Thai politics. Southeast Asian Studies, 28(4), 445–465.
   Google Scholar
• Taniguchi, N. (2008). Diet members and seat inheritance. In S. Martin & G. Steel (Eds.), Democratic reform in Japan: Assessing the impact (pp. 65–80). Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
   Google Scholar
• Tawatchai, K. (1998). Kān-sāng thāyāt thāng-kān-meūang khøng dtra-goon kān-meūang Thai. Unpublished MA thesis. Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (2013). Class, charisma, and clientelism in Thai and Philippine populist parties. In D. Tomsa & A. Ufen (Eds.), Party politics in Southeast Asia: Clientelism and electoral competition in Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thailand’s Shinawatras: From clan to dynasty. BBC News, 13 July 2011. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-14075218
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A. (2008). The rural constitution and the everyday politics of elections in Northern Thailand. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 84–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, R. D., & Lidauer, M. (2011). Thailand general election 3^rd July 2011. Bangkok: The Asian Network for Free Elections.
   Google Scholar