The Trap of Neo-patrimonialism: Social Accountability and Good Governance in Cambodia

References

• Ackerman, J. (2004). Co-governance for accountability: Beyond “exit” and “voice”. World Development, 32(3), 447–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babović, M., & Vuković, D. (2014). Social accountability in Cambodia. LSE Justice and Security Research Programme Paper 19. ISSN 2051-0926.
   Google Scholar
• Babović, M., & Vuković, D. (2015). Cambodia: A survey of livelihood strategies and expectations for the future. Phnom Penh: The Asian Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2010). Two concepts of accountability: Accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. West European Politics, 33(5), 946–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratton, M., & Van de Walle, N. (1994). Neopatrimonial regimes and Political transitions in Africa. World Politics, 46(4), 453–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cock, A. R. (2010). External actors and the relative autonomy of the ruling elite in post-UNTAC Cambodia. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 41(2), 241–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. (2004). Civil society. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Encarnación, O. (2011). The myth of civil society: Social capital and democratic consolidation in Spain and Brazil. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, T. (2013). Doing NGO work: The politics of being “civil society” and promoting “good governance” in Cambodia. Australian Geographer, 44(1), 97–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2007). Accountability politics: Power and voice in rural Mexico. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2014). Social accountability: What does evidence really say? Global Partnership for Social Accountability Working Paper 1. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J., & McGee, R. (2013). The impact of transparency and accountability initiatives. Development Policy Review, 31(S1), 3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, A. M., & Jenkins, R. (2005). Reinventing accountability: Making democracy work for human development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harriss, J. (2001). Depoliticizing development. The World Bank and social capital. New Delhi: Left Word.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. (2003). The political economy of Cambodia’s transition 1991–2001. London: Routledge Curzon.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, G. (2000). NGO way to go: Political accountability of non-government organisations in a democratic society. IPA Backgrounder, 12(3), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B. (2006). Social policy for the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Houtzager, P. (2012). Widgets or watchdogs? Conceptual explorations in social accountability. Public Management Review, 14(2), 145–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A. (2013). Do they work? Assessing the impact of transparency and accountability initiatives in service delivery. Development Policy Review, 31(S1), 29–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamat, S. (2004). The privatization of public interests: Theorizing NGO discourse in a neoliberal era. Review of International Political Economy, 11(1), 155–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2012). Democracy in action: Decentralization in post-conflict Cambodia. PhD dissertation. Peace and Development Research Programme, School of Global Studies, University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. (2007). The demise of clientelism in affluent capitalist democracies. In H. Kitschelt & S. Wilkinson (Eds.), Patrons, clients, and policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition (pp. 298–321). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kimchoeun, P. et al. (2007). Accountability and neopatrimonialism in Cambodia: A critical literature review. Phnom Penh: Cambodia Development Resource Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ledgerwood, J., & Vijghen, J. (2002). Decision-making in rural Khmer villages. In J. Ledgerwood (Ed.), Cambodia emerges from the past: Eight essays (pp. 109–150). DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Southeast Asia Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Malena, C., Forster, R., & Singh, J. (2004). Social accountability: An introduction to the concept and emerging practice. Social Development Papers, Participation and Civic Engagement. Paper No. 76. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Mandel, R. (2002). Seeding civil society. In C. Hann (Ed.), Post-socialism: Ideals, ideologies and practices in Eurasia (pp. 279–296). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manor, J. (1999). The political economy of democratic decentralization. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D., & Lewis, D. (Eds.). (2006). The aid effect: Giving and governing in international development. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (2015). From shouting to counting: Civil society and good governance agenda in Cambodia. Pacific Review, 27(2), 241–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G. (2004). The quality of democracy: Why the Rule of Law matters. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 33–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öjendal, J., & Sedara, K. (2006). Korob, Kaud, Klach: In search of agency in rural Cambodia. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 37(3), 507–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öjendal, J., & Lilja, M. (Eds.). (2009). Beyond democracy in Cambodia: Political reconstruction in a post-conflict society. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzotti, E. (2011). The workings of accountability: Contexts and conditions. In S. Odugbemi & T. Lee (Eds.), Accountability through public opinion: From inertia to public action (pp. 53–64). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzotti, E., & Smulovitz, C. (Eds.). (2006). Enforcing the Rule of Law: Social accountability in the new Latin American democracies. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peou, S. (2005). International democracy assistance for peacebuilding: Cambodia and beyond. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, J., & Tritt, G. (Eds.). (2011). Voice, choice and decision: A study of local governance processes in Cambodia. Phnom Penh: The World Bank & The Asian Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Government of Cambodia. (2013). Strategic plan on social accountability for sub-national democratic development. Phnom Penh: Royal Government of Cambodia.
   Google Scholar
• Rodan, G., & Hughes, C. (2012). Ideological coalitions and the international promotion of social accountability: The Philippines and Cambodia compared. International Studies Quarterly, 56(2), 367–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, I. (2008). Civil society and good governance: (Re-)conceptualizing the interface. World Development, 36(4), 677–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, S. (2004). Too much civil society? Donor-driven NGOs in the Balkans. In L. Dhundale & E. Andersen (Eds.), Revisiting the role of civil society in the promotion of human rights (pp. 197–220). Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Human Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1972). Patron–client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. The American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sok, S. (2014). Limited state and strong social forces: Fishing lot management in Cambodia. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 45(2), 174–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, S. (2010). Cambodia’s neoliberal order, violence, authoritarianism, and the contestation of public space. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, S. (2015). Violent neoliberalism: Development, discourse and dispossession in Cambodia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Strangio, S. (2014). Hun Sen’s Cambodia. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, J. (2005). A short history of Cambodia: From empire to survival. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Un, K. (2006). State, society and democratic consolidation: The case of Cambodia. Pacific Affairs, 79(2), 225–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Un, K., & So, S. (2011). Land rights in Cambodia: How neopatrimonial politics restricts land policy reform. Pacific Affairs, 84(2), 289–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuković, D. (2015). The role of civil society in fostering government accountability in contemporary Serbia: On the limits of depoliticized social activism. Sociologija, 57(4), 637–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. (2007). Poverty Profile in Cambodia. Phnom Penh: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. (2013). Reflections on social accountability: Catalyzing democratic governance to accelerate progress towards the Millennium Development Goals. New York: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2004). From shouting to counting: A new frontier in social development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2009). Cambodia: Linking citizens and the state: An assessment of civil society contribution to the good governance. Phnom Penh: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar