References
- AAKS. (2008). Aam Aadmi Ka Sipahi. Retrieved from http://indianyouthcongress.blogspot.com/2008/08/aam-aadmi-ka-sipahi-aaks.html
- Aiyar, Y. (2010). Invited spaces, invited participation: Effects of greater participation on accountability in service delivery. India Review, 9(2), 204–229.
- Anand, P. B. (2011). Right to information and local governance: An exploration. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(1), 135–151.
- Annexure. (2007). In B. Das & R. K. Bhattacharyya (Eds.), The rights and wrongs of it: The right to information (pp. 449–552). Kolkata: Gangchil.
- Basu, P. P. (2007). The RTI campaign in India. In A. K. Mukhopadhyay (Ed.), Right to information (pp. 63–71). Kolkata: Administrative Training Institute.
- Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2014). Indignation or resignation: The implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance, 27(2), 291–320.
- Baviskar, A. (2007). Is knowledge power? The right to information campaign in India. Retrieved from http://rtiworkshop.pbworks.com/f/2006-00-IN-Is-Knowledge-Power-The-Right-to-Information-Campaign-in-India-Amita-Baviskar.pdf
- Burman, A. (2013). Transparency and political parties: Finding the right instrument. Economic & Political Weekly, XLVIII(28), 34–37.
- Chacraverti, S. (2007). The quest for participant citizenship. In B. Das & R. K. Bhattacharyya (Eds.), The rights and wrongs of it: The right to information (pp. 121–159). Kolkata: Gangchil.
- Chatterjee, P. (2007). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. Delhi: Permanent Black.
- Choudhury, A. (2010). A manual on Right to Information Act, 2005. Kolkata: IAPR.
- de-Shalit, A. (2004). Political philosophy and empowering citizens. Political Studies, 52(4), 802–818.
- Gaventa, J., & McGee, R. (2013). The impact of transparency and accountability initiatives. Development Policy Review, 31(1), S3–S28.
- Ghosh, S. (2009). NGOs as political institutions. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 44(5), 475–495.
- Goetz, A. M., & Jenkins, R. (2001). Hybrid forms of accountability: Citizen engagement in institutions of public-sector oversight in India. Public Management Review, 3(3), 363–383.
- Immergut, E. M. (1998). The theoretical core of new institutionalism. Politics & Society, 26(1), 5–34.
- Jayal, N. G. (2008). New directions in theorising accountability. IDS Bulletin, 38(6), 105–110.
- Jenkins, R. (2004). In varying states of decay: Anti-corruption politics in Maharashtra and Rajasthan. In R. Jenkins (Ed.), Regional reflections: Comparing politics across India’s states (pp. 219–252). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
- Jenkins, R. (2007). Civil society versus corruption. Journal of Democracy, 18(2), 55–69.
- Jenkins, R., & Goetz, A. M. (1999). Accounts and accountability: Theoretical implications of the right-to-information movement in India. Third World Quarterly, 20(3), 603–622.
- Joshi, A. (2008). Producing social accountability? The impact of service delivery reforms. IDS Bulletin, 38(6), 10–17.
- Joshi, A. (2013). Do they work? Assessing the impact of transparency and accountability initiatives in service delivery. Development Policy Review, 31(1), S29–S48.
- Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464.
- Kejriwal, A. (2006). RTI – Aspirations and challenges. Yojana, 50 (Republic Day Special), 22–25.
- Kejriwal, A. (2007). Representative democracy or direct democracy. In B. Das & R. K. Bhattacharyya (Eds.), The rights and wrongs of it: The right to information (pp. 407–420). Kolkata: Gangchil.
- Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2016). Does democracy reduce corruption? Democratization, 23(7), 1198–1215.
- Lindstedt, C., & Naurin, D. (2010) Transparency is not enough: Making transparency effective in reducing corruption. International Political Science Review, 31(3), 301–322.
- Mathur, N. (2015). Paper tiger: Law, bureaucracy and the developmental state in Himalayan India. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
- MGNREGA website. (undated). Retrieved from http://www.nrega.nic.in/netnrega/home.aspx
- Moncrieffe, J. (2011). Relational accountability: Complexities of structural injustice. London: Zed Books.
- NDTV. (2011). What is the Jan Lokpal Bill, why it’s important? Retrieved from http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/what-is-the-jan-lokpal-bill-why-its-important-96600
- O’Donnell, G. (2004). Why the rule of law matters. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 32–46.
- Pande, S. (2008). The right to information and societal accountability: The case of Delhi PDS campaign. IDS Bulletin, 38(6), 47–55.
- RAAG. (2014). Who uses the RTI Act? Retrieved from https://www.snsindia.org/raag-final-report-raag-applications-16-revised-may-2014.pdf
- RaaG & SNS. (2017). Tilting the balance of power: Adjudicating the RTI Act for the oppressed and the marginalised. Retrieved from http://snsindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Adjudicating-the-RTI-Act-2nd-edition-2017.pdf
- Roy, A., Singh, S., & Dey, N. (2006). A fight for “right to know”. Yojana, 50 (Republic Day Special), 2–8.
- Rubenstein, J. (2007). Accountability in an unequal world. Journal of Politics, 69(3), 616–632.
- Shapiro, I. (1996). Elements of democratic justice. Political Theory, 24(4), 579–619.
- Sharma, P. (2012). The Right to Information Act in India: The turbid world of transparency reforms. PhD thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science.
- Sharma, A. (2013). State transparency after the neoliberal turn: The politics, limits, and paradoxes of India’s right to information law. Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 36(2), 308–325.
- Shoemaker, D. (2011). Attributability, answerability, and accountability: Toward a wider theory of moral responsibility. Ethics, 121(3), 602–632.
- Shreyaskar, P. K. P. (2014). “Known unknowns” of RTI: Legitimate exemptions or conscious secrecy? Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(24), 32–38.
- Singh, S. (2010). The genesis and evolution of the right to information regime in India. Retrieved from http://rtiworkshop.pbworks.com/f/2010-04-IN-Country-Paper-Shekhar-Singh.pdf
- Sinha, D. (2007). For the right kind of communication. In B. Das & R. K. Bhattacharyya (Eds.), The rights and wrongs of it: The right to information (pp. 335–358). Kolkata: Gangchil.
- Smith, B. C. (2007). Good governance and development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Vadlamannati, K. C., & Cooray, A. (2017). Transparency pays? Evaluating the effects of the freedom of information laws on perceived government corruption. Journal of Development Studies, 53(1), 116–137.
- Véron, R., Corbridge, S., Williams, G., & Srivastava, M. (2003). The everyday state and political society in India: Structuring access to the Employment Assurance Scheme. Journal of Development Studies, 39(5), 1–28.
- Warren, M. E. (2002). What can democratic participation mean today? Political Theory, 30(5), 677–701.
- WBSIC Website. (undated). Retrieved from http://wbic.gov.in/Annual%20Report/Annual%20Report_2006_07,%2007_08,%2008_09.pdf
- Webb, M. (2010). Success stories: Rhetoric, authenticity, and the right to information movement in north India. Contemporary South Asia, 18(3), 293–304.