Disciplining Statelessness: Fragmentary Outcomes of the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy in India

References

• Atwill, D. G. (2018). Islamic Shangri-La: Inter-Asian relations and Lhasa’s Muslim communities, 1600–1960. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balasubramaniam, M., & Gupta, S. (2019). From refuge to rights: Majnu ka Tilla Tibetan Colony in New Delhi. kritisk etnografi: Swedish Journal of Anthropology, 2(1–2), 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, S. (2018). In diasporic lands: Tibetan refugees and their transformation since the exodus. Orient Black Swan.
   Google Scholar
• Bentz, A.-S., & Goreau-Ponceaud, A. (2019). To be or not to be a refugee? Reflections on refugeehood and citizenship among Sri Lankan Tamils in India. Citizenship Studies, 24(2), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choedon, T. (2019). Rehabilitation or a temporal adjustment: An assessment of the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy, 2014. Tibet Policy Journal, VI(2), 15–38.
   Google Scholar
• Choedon, Y. (2017). Challenges to Tibetan diasporic institutions in India: Imperatives of reform and the way ahead. International Studies, 54(1–4), 196–217.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, J., & Connell, J. (2003). Place, exile and identity: The contemporary experience of Palestinians in Sydney. Australian Geographer, 34(3), 329–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. W., & Elden, S. (Eds.). (2007). Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dalai Lama. (1996, 14 June). Keynote Address by His Holiness the Dalai Lama [Keynote Address]. Second International Conference of Tibet Support Groups, Bonn, Germany. https://tibet.net/about-tibet/worldwide-tibet-movement/tsgs-conferences/second-international-conference-of-tsgs-bonn-14-17-june-1996/#6
   Google Scholar
• Department of Home, CTA (Central Tibetan Relief Committee). (n.d.). Tibetan settlements in India. https://centraltibetanreliefcommittee.org/settlements/tibetan-settlements-in-india/
   Google Scholar
• Department of Home, CTA (Central Tibetan Relief Committee). (2013, 10 May). Statement on land case in Phuntsokling settlement. Central Tibetan Administration News Flash. https://tibet.net/statement-on-land-case-in-phuntsokling-settlement/
   Google Scholar
• Driver, F. (1994). Bodies in space: Foucault’s account of disciplinary power. In C. Jones & R. Porter (Eds.), Reassessing Foucault: Power, medicine and the body (pp. 113–132). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. (2007). Governmentality, calculation, territory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(3), 562–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. (2016). On the threshold of statelessness: Palestinian narratives of loss and erasure. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(2), 301–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1981). Foucault on modern power: Empirical insights and normative confusions. Praxis International, 1(3), 272–287.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Himachal Pradesh. (2015). Himachal Pradesh Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy. http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in/OPENFILE1.aspx?ID=%20240/GAZETTE/2015-2/24/2015%20&etype=SPECIAL
   Google Scholar
• Government of India Ministry of Home Affairs Freedom Fighters and Rehabilitation Division. (2014). Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy. https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/FFR_ANNEXURE_A_17092019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, S. (2019). Enduring liminality: Voting rights and Tibetan exiles in India. Asian Ethnicity, 20(3), 330–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyot-Réchard, B. (2016). Shadow states: India, China and the Himalayas, 1910–1962. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guyot-Réchard, B. (2019). The fear of being compared: State-shadowing in the Himalayas, 1910–62. Political Geography, 75, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, M. G. (1993). Space and social control in the administration of the Oglala Lakota (“Sioux”), 1871–1879. Journal of Historical Geography, 19(4), 412–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, M. G. (1997). Space and the structuring of disciplinary power: An interpretive review. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 79(3), 171–180.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C. (2003). Refugee determination: Power and resistance in systems of Foucauldian power. Administration & Society, 35(4), 462–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, T. (2013). Geographical diversions: Tibetan trade, global transactions. University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. J. (1996). Power, subjectification and resistance in Foucault. SubStance, 25(1), 78–110.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, N. (2005). The development of the boundary between the state of Jammu & Kashmir and British India, and its representation on maps of the Lingti plain. In J. Bray (Ed.), Ladakhi histories: Local and regional perspectives (pp. 217–234). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, J. (2000). Managing displacement: Refugees and the politics of humanitarianism. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffmann, T. (2018). The words of developees: Study of the discourses of the Tibetan refugees. In S. Bhoil & E. Galvan-Alvarez (Eds.), Tibetan subjectivities on the global stage: Negotiating dispossession (pp. 69–92). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kharat, R. (2003). Tibetan refugees in India. Kaveri Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. T. (1993). Himalayan frontier trade: Newar diaspora merchants and Buddhism. In C. Ramble & M. Brauen (Eds.), Anthropology of Tibet and the Himalayas (pp. 165–178). Volkerkundemuseum.
   Google Scholar
• Lilja, M., & Vinthagen, S. (2014). Sovereign power, disciplinary power and biopower: Resisting what power with what resistance? Journal of Political Power, 7(1), 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Lippert, R. (1999). Governing refugees: The relevance of governmentality to understanding the international refugee regime. Alternatives, 24(3), 295–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, J. (2011). Tibetan refugees as objects of development: Indian development philosophy and refugee resistance in the establishment of Lukzung Samdrupling, the first Tibetan refugee settlement in India. Himalaya, Journal of the Association of Nepal and Himalayan Studies, 30(1), 115–125.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, J., Nagarajarao, S., & Childs, G. (2009). South Indian Tibetans: Development dynamics in the early stages of the Tibetan refugee settlement Lugs zung bsam grub gling, Bylakuppe. Journal of the International Association of Tibetan Studies, 4, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Malkki, L. H. (1995). Purity and exile: Violence, memory and national cosmology among Hutu refugees in Tanzania. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McConnachie, K. (2016). Camps of containment: A genealogy of the refugee camp. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism and Development, 7(3), 397–412.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, F. (2012). Governmentality to practise the state? Constructing a Tibetan population in exile. Environment and Planning, 30(1), 78–95.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, F. (2016). Rehearsing the state: The political practices of the Tibetan Government in Exile. Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Muckelbauer, J. (2000). On reading differently: Through Foucault’s resistance. College English, 63(1), 71–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehru, J. (2013[1959]). In the Lok Sabha: The situation in Tibet. In M. K. Palat (Ed.), Selected works of Jawaharlal Nehru: Vol. 47 ( 1–31 March 1959) (pp. 455–459). Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Norbu, J. (2015, 17 January). Resurrecting a lost homeland. Shadow Tibet. https://www.jamyangnorbu.com/blog/2015/01/17/resurrecting-a-lost-homland/?fbclid=IwAR1A317n2Qwj9fBLcefzYQMU6rNgH1eMES4MaNHqh3kLlGLzIaqqjKm6ZYI
   Google Scholar
• Novak, P. (2015). Refugee status as a productive tension. Transnational Legal Theory, 6(2), 287–311.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, L. (2017). The refugee camp as a space of multiple ambiguities and subjectivities. Political Geography, 60, 110–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivius, E. (2017). Sites of repression and resistance: Political space in refugee camps in Thailand. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 289–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palakshappa, T. C. (1978). Tibetans in India: A case study of Mundgod Tibetans. Sterling Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Peteet, J. (2005). Landscape of hope and despair. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phuntso, T. (2003). Government in exile. In D. Bernstorff & H. von Welck (Eds.), Exile as challenge: The Tibetan diaspora (pp. 125–150). Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, B. L. (1996). Foucault and the politics of resistance. Polity, 28(4), 445–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planning Commission, Central Tibetan Administration. (2010). Demographic survey of Tibetans in exile – 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, J. (1983). Ladakh: Crossroads of High Asia. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, S. (2008). The Tibetan Government-in-Exile: Politics at large. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saklani, G. (1984). The uprooted Tibetans in India: A sociological study of continuity and change. Cosmo Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shakya, T. (1999). The dragon in the Land of Snows. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, S. B. (2013). Himalayan border citizens: Sovereignty and mobility in the Nepal–Tibetan Autonomous Region (TAR) of China border zone. Political Geography, 35, 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social and Resource Development Fund, Central Tibetan Administration. (2020). Baseline study of the Tibetan diaspora community outside South Asia.
   Google Scholar
• Tarodi, T. (2011). Revisiting home: Tibetan refugees, perceptions of home (land) and politics of return. Institute for Social and Economic Change. http://www.isec.ac.in/WP%20266%20-%20Tunga%20Tarodi_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1984). Foucault on freedom and truth. Political Theory, 12(2), 152–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinley, T. (2004). India – I see it soon depart. In B. D. Sonam (Ed.), Muses in exile: An anthology of Tibetan poetry (p. 149). Paljor Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, G. (1970). Tibetan refugees in a decade of exile. Pacific Affairs, 43(3), 410–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasmin, S. (2020). A socio-economic study of the Choephelling Tibetan settlement in Miao, Arunachal Pradesh. In S. K. Das & N. Chowdhary (Eds.), Refugee crises and third-world economies: Policies and perspectives (pp. 115–121). Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, E. T. (2019). “The land belonged to Nepal but the people belonged to Tibet”: Overlapping sovereignties and mobility in the Limi Valley borderland. Geopolitics, 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2019.1628018
   Google Scholar
• Yunsong, H. (2017). Tragedy of rehabilitation: Land issue of Tibetans in India. China Tibetology, 2, 101–120.
   Google Scholar