Government funding of non-governmental organisations and the implied freedom of political communication: The constitutionality of gag clauses

References

• Bronitt, S. and Williams, G. 1996. Political freedom as an outlaw: Republican theory and political protest. Adelaide Law Review 18: 289–330.
   Google Scholar
• Chesterman, M. 2000. Freedom of speech in Australian law: A delicate plant. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D. 1992. Beyond unconstitutional conditions: Charting spheres of neutrality in government-funded speech. New York University Law Review 67: 675–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denniss, R. 2013. Silence of the logging lambs. Canberra: Australia Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, O. 1965. Jesting Pilate. Buffalo, NY: Hein.
   Google Scholar
• Ely, J.H. 1980. Democracy and distrust. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiss, O. 1996. Liberalism divided: Freedom of speech and the many uses of state power. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelber, K. 2011. Freedom of speech and Australian political culture. University of Queensland Law Journal 30: 135–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. and Maddison, S. 2007. Silencing dissent: How the Australian government is controlling public opinion and stifling debate. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, J. 1995. Constitutional implications from representative democracy. Federal Law Review 23: 37–76.
   Google Scholar
• Kreimer, S. 1984. Allocative sanctions: The problem of negative rights in a positive state. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 132: 1293–398. doi: 10.2307/3311891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, J. 1960. Two treatises of government. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, M. 2001. Third sector: The contribution of non-profit and co-operative enterprises in Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, M. 2003. Why the third sector should interest (Australian) political scientists. Australian National University Digital Collection. URL: <http://hdl.handle.net/1885/41802>. Consulted 10 September 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Maddison, S. 2007. Redefining democracy. In C. Hamilton and S. Maddison, eds. Silencing dissent: How the Australian government is controlling public opinion and stifling debate. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Maddison, S., Denniss, R. and Hamilton, C. 2004. Silencing dissent: Non-government organisations and Australian democracy. Discussion paper no. 65. Australia Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F. 2011. The legal concept of charity and its expansion after the Aid/Watch decision. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies Journal 3(3): 20–33.
   Google Scholar
• Meagher, D. 2005. The protection of political communication under the Australian Constitution. University of New South Wales Law Journal 28: 30–68.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, R. and Perkins, R. 2003. Changing roles of community sector peak bodies in a neo-liberal policy environment in Australia. Wollongong: University of Wollongong.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J.S. 2002. Utilitarianism, on liberty, considerations on representative government. New York: Everyman Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, J. 1644. Appeal for the liberty of unlicensed printing. Speech to the English Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connell, A., Martin, F. and Chia, J. 2013. Law, policy and politics in Australia's recent not-for-profit sector reforms. Australian Tax Forum 28: 289–315.
   Google Scholar
• Patmore, G. 1998. Making sense of representative democracy and the implied freedom of political communication in the High Court of Australia. Griffith Law Review 7: 97–123.
   Google Scholar
• Sawer, M. 2002. Governing for the mainstream: Implications for community representation. Australian Journal of Public Administration 61: 39–49. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.00257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, A. 1998. Freedom of political communication, the Constitution and the common law. Federal Law Review 26: 219–57.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, A. 2001. Rights, personal rights and freedoms: The nature of the freedom of political communication. Melbourne University Law Review 25: 374–417.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, K. 1989. Unconstitutional conditions. Harvard Law Review 102: 1413–506. doi: 10.2307/1341337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, G. 1996. Sounding the core of representative democracy: Implied freedoms and electoral reform. Melbourne University Law Review 20: 848–70.
   Google Scholar
• Winterton, G., Lee, H.P., Glass, A. and Thomson, J. 2007. Australian constitutional law: Commentary and materials. 2nd ed. Sydney: Thomson Lawbook Co.
   Google Scholar
• Yeatman, A. 1998. Activism and the policy process. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, J.D. 1998. Justice or injustice for the poor? A look at the constitutionality of congressional restrictions on legal services. William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 6: 827–83.
   Google Scholar
• Zines, L. 2008. The high court and the constitution. 5th ed. Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar