Rethinking representation: The challenge of non-humans

References

• Anheier, H.K. 2004. Civil society: Measurement, evaluation, policy. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Badiou, A. [1998] 2002. Ethics: An essay on the understanding of evil. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Badiou, A. [1988] 2007. Being and event. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. 2004. The rights of others: Aliens, residents and citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. 2007. Democracy cross borders: From demos to demoi. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, J. 2011. What it means to be human: Reflections from 1971 to the present. London: Virago.
   Google Scholar
• Callicott, J.B. 1985. Intrinsic value, quantum theory and environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics 7: 257–75. doi: 10.5840/enviroethics19857334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callicott, J.B. 1989. In defense of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Celis, K. 2008. Gendering representation. In G. Goertz and A.G. Mazur, eds. Politics, gender and concept: Theory and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 2008. The animal that therefore I am. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 2009. The beast and the sovereign: The seminars of Jacques Derrida. Volume I. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, C. 2004. Eating meat and eating people. In C.R. Sunstein and M.C. Nussbaum, eds. Animal rights: Current debates and new directions. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Disch, L. 2009. Beyond mandate democracy. Paper presented at NCCR Workshop Political Representation: New forms of measuring and old challenges, 12–14 November, Zurich. URL: <http://www.nccr-democracy.ch/polrep/papers/Disch.pdf>. Consulted 20 May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Disch, L. 2011. Toward a mobilization conception of democratic representation. American Political Science Review 105: 100–14. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. 1996. Representative democracy and the environment. In W.M. Lafferty and J. Meadowcroft, eds. Democracy and the environment: Problems and prospects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. 1999. The discourse ethic and the problem of representing nature. Environmental Politics 8: 24–49. doi: 10.1080/09644019908414460
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. 2011. Representing nature. In S. Alonso, J. Keane and W. Merkel, eds. The future of representative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francione, G.L. 1995. Animals, property and the law. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francione, G.L. 1996. Rain without thunder: The ideology of the animal rights movement. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francione, G.L. 2000. Introduction to animal rights: Your child or the dog? Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francione, G.L. 2004. Animals – property or persons? In C.R. Sunstein and M.C. Nussbaum, eds. Animal rights: Current debates and new directions. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, R. 1993. Animals, politics and morality. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, R. 2010. Animals, ethics and public policy. Political Quarterly 81: 123–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.02062.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, R. 2011. In defense of animal sentience: A critique of Cochrane's liberty thesis. Political Studies 59: 175–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00848.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R.E. 1996. Enfranchising the earth, and its alternatives. Political Studies 44: 835–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00337.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, C.C. 2004. Globalizing democracy and human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14: 575–99. doi: 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2008. When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2006. Political ontology. In R.E. Goodin and C. Tilly, eds. The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. 1995. Democracy and the global order: From the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. 1999. Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’. Journal of Politics 61: 628–57. doi: 10.2307/2647821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. 2003. Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review. 97: 515–28. doi: 10.1017/S0003055403000856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. [1968] 1993. The Merleau-Ponty aesthetics reader: Philosophy and painting. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, J. 2001. Representing people, representing nature, representing the world. Environment and Planning C 19: 483–500. doi: 10.1068/c12s
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. 1967. The concept of representation. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. 1993. Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. 2000. Integrating ethical frameworks for animals, humans and nature: A critical feminist eco-socialist analysis. Ethics and the Environment 5: 285–322. doi: 10.1016/S1085-6633(00)00033-4
   Google Scholar
• Regan, T. 2004. The case for animal rights. 2nd edn. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, A. 2006. Towards a general theory of political representation. Journal of Politics 68: 1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00365.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, A. 2009. Representation rethought: On trustees, delegates and gyroscopes in the study of political representation and democracy. American Political Science Review 103: 216–30. doi: 10.1017/S0003055409090261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodman, J. 1977. The liberation of nature? Inquiry 20 (1–4): 83–131. doi: 10.1080/00201747708601834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolston III, H. 1989. Environmental ethics: Duties to and values in the natural world. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. 2003. The representative claim. Paper presented at Political Representation, ECPR Joint Sessions, 28 March–2 April, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. 2006a. Representation. In A. Dobson and R. Eckersley, eds. Political theory and the ecological challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. 2006b. The representative claim. Contemporary Political Theory 5: 297–318. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300234
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. 2008a. Authorization and authenticity: Representation and the unelected. Journal of Political Philosophy 17: 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saward, M. 2008b. Representation and democracy: Revisions and possibilities. Sociology Compass 2: 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00102.x
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. 2008c. The subject of representation. Representation 44: 93–97.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. 1975. Animal liberation: A new ethics for our treatment of animals. London: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C.D. 2010. Should trees have standing? Law, morality and the environment. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strolovitch, D.Z. 2006. Do interest groups represent the disadvantaged? Advocacy at the intersections of race, class and gender. Journal of Politics 68: 894–910. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00478.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanasescu, M. 2013. The rights of nature in Ecuador: The making of an idea. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 70: 846–61.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P.W. 1986. Respect for nature: A theory of environmental ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. 1998. Rhetoric and representation: The politics of advocacy. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, September. URL: <http://www.hatt.nom.fr/rhetorique/pdf/article16.pdf>. Consulted 20 November 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. 2000. Representation as advocacy: A study of democratic deliberation. Political Theory 28: 758–86. doi: 10.1177/0090591700028006003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. and Warren, M.E. 2008. The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387–412. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M.E. 2001. Democracy and association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weston, A. 1996. Self-validating reduction: Toward a theory of environmental devaluation. Environmental Ethics 18: 115–32. doi: 10.5840/enviroethics199618227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar