‘Protectionism, obviously, is not dead’: A case study on New Zealand's biosecurity policy and the causes-of-effects of economic interests

References

• Bell, S. 2012. The power of ideas: The ideational shaping of the structural power of business. International Studies Quarterly 56: 661–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. and Hindmoor, A. 2013. The structural power of business and the power of ideas: The strange case of the Australian mining tax. New Political Economy. doi:10.1080/13563467.2013.796452
   Google Scholar
• Bewsell, D., Bigsby, H. and Cullen, R. 2012. Using involvement to understand individual responses to an issue: The case of New Zealand biosecurity. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 55: 73–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blincoe, J. 1993. Pests, a bipartisan issue: Can legislative reforms help? New Zealand Journal of Zoology 20: 313–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremer, R. and Brooking, T. 1993. Federated farmers and the state. In B.S. Roper and C. Rudd, eds. State and economy in New Zealand. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Büthe, T. 2008. The globalization of health and safety standards: Delegation of regulatory authority in the SPS agreement of the 1994 agreement establishing the World Trade Organization. Law & Contemporary Problems 71: 219–55.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. and Rosin, C. 2011. After the ‘organic industrial complex’: An ontological expedition through commercial organic agriculture in New Zealand. Journal of Rural Studies 27: 350–61.
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, E. 2009. Fonterra in Latin America: A case study of a New Zealand company abroad. Political Science 61: 19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. 2011. Quiet politics and business power: Corporate control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daugbjerg, C. and Studsgaard, J. 2005. Issue redefinition, venue change and radical agricultural policy reforms in Sweden and New Zealand. Scandinavian Political Studies 28: 103–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demortain, D. 2012. Enabling global principle-based regulation: The case of risk analysis in the Codex Alimentarius. Regulation & Governance 6: 207–24.
   Google Scholar
• Epps, T. 2008. International trade and health protection: A critical assessment of the WTO's SPS agreement. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H. and Newman, A.L. 2010. Making global markets: Historical institutionalism in international political economy. Review of International Political Economy 17: 609–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. 2007. Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldson, S.L., Frampton, E.R. and Ridley, G.S. 2010. The effects of legislation and policy in New Zealand and Australia on biosecurity and arthropod biological control research and development. Biological Control 52: 241–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. and Pierson, P. 2002. Business power and social policy: Employers and the formation of the American welfare state. Politics & Society 30: 277–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathaway, S.C. 1993. Risk assessment procedures used by the Codex Alimentarius Commission and its subsidiary and advisory bodies. Food Control 4: 189–201.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, D.J. and Le Heron, R.B. 2002. Horticultural reform in the European Union and New Zealand: Further developments towards a global fresh fruit and vegetable complex. Australian Geographer 33: 9–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, V. and Dibden, J. 2011. Biosecurity, trade liberalisation, and the (anti) politics of risk analysis: The Australia–New Zealand apples dispute. Environment and Planning A 43: 393–409.
   Google Scholar
• Higgott, R.A. and Cooper, A.F. 1990. Middle power leadership and coalition building: Australia, the Cairns group and the Uruguay round of trade negotiations. International Organization 44: 589–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmoor, A. and McGeechan, J. 2013. Luck, systematic luck and business power: Lucky all the way down or trying hard to get what it wants without trying? Political Studies 61: 834–49.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, M. 1993. Pest problems: The view of New Zealand federated farmers. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 20: 241–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay, M., and Morad, M. 2006. The socioeconomic dimensions of biosecurity: The New Zealand experience. International Journal of Environmental Studies 6: 293–302.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, M., Morad, M. and Bell, A. 2003. Biosecurity, a policy dilemma for New Zealand. Land Use Policy 20: 121–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawharu, A. 2007. The New Zealand cases in World Trade Organisation dispute settlement: So far, so good. New Zealand Law Review Part i: 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kellow, A., Haward, M. and Welch, K. 2005. Salmon and fruit salad: Australia's response to World Trade Organisation quarantine disputes. Australian Journal of Political Science 40: 17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelsey, J. 1999. Reclaiming the future: New Zealand and the global economy. Wellington, NZ: Bridget Williams Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. 2012. Disguised protectionism and linkages to the GATT/WTO. World Politics 64: 426–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. 2005. Underarm bowling and Australia–New Zealand trade. Australian Review of Public Affairs 18 July. URL: <http://www.australianreview.net/digest/2005/07/knight.html>. Consulted 19 February 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Larner, W. 2009. Neoliberalism, Mike Moore, and the WTO. Environment and Planning A 41: 1576–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. 1977. Politics and markets. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lusztig, M. 2004. The limits of protectionism: Building coalitions for free trade. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• MAF [New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry]. 1987. Noxious plants administration: A discussion paper. September. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• MAF. 1989. National Agricultural Security Policy. National Agriculture Security Service 89(2). Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• MAF. 1991a. National Adviser (Animal Health). The importation into New Zealand of meat and meat products: A review of the risks to animal health. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• MAF. 1991b. The primary sector's contribution to the New Zealand economy. Policy Discussion Paper 104. May. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• MAF. 1992. MAF report. Appendix to the Journal of the House of Representatives. Chapter 5. 30 June.
   Google Scholar
• MAF. 1993. MAF report. Appendix to the Journal of the House of Representatives. Chapter 5. 30 June.
   Google Scholar
• MAF. 1994. Agricultural Development Steering Committee. GATT, a big deal for New Zealand agriculture: Final report of the agricultural development steering committee and conference proceedings. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. 2010. After KVV: The new methodology of qualitative research. World Politics 62: 120–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. 2010. A theory of gradual institutional change. In J. Mahoney and K. Thelen, eds. Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency and power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maye, D., Dibden, J., Higgins, V. and Potter, C. 2012. Governing biosecurity in a neoliberal world: Comparative perspectives from Australia and the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning A 44: 150–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCraw, D.J. 2001. Idealism and realism in the foreign policy of the fourth Labour government. Political Science 53: 21–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravscik, A. 1994. Why the European Community strengthens the state: Domestic politics and international cooperation. Working Paper Series 52. Cambridge, MA: Center for European Studies, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• MPI [Ministry for Primary Industry]. 2014. The biosecurity system. URL: <http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/biosec/sys>. Consulted 24 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Herald. 1989a. Agricultural laws go under scrutiny. New Zealand Herald 4 May, 5.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Herald. 1989b. Breakthrough boon for NZ farmers. New Zealand Herald 10 April, 2.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Herald. 1989c. Quarantine ‘diluted’. New Zealand Herald 4 May, 13.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Herald. 1990. Parliament to focus on social policies. New Zealand Herald 15 February, 5.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament [Hansard]. 1987a. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates: Debate – general main speaker – Hon. Mike Moore, 11 November.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament [Hansard]. 1987b. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates: Appropriation Bill (No. 3) – estimates: In committee main speaker – Hon. Mike Moore, 12 November.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament [Hansard]. 1988a. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates: Debate – general main speaker – Hon. Mike Moore, 4 May.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament [Hansard]. 1988b. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates: Appropriation Bill (No. 2) – estimates: In committee main speaker – Hon. Mike Moore, 15 September.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament [Hansard]. 1992. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates – Biosecurity Bill: Introduction, 8 December: 13091/92.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament [Hansard]. 1993a. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates: Biosecurity Bill: Report of Primary Production Committee, 10 August, 17294, 17296.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament [Hansard]. 1993b. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates: Biosecurity Bill: Second reading, 12 August, 1743.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament [Hansard]. 1994. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates: Questions on notice: GATT – a big deal for New Zealand agriculture, main speaker – Sandra Lee, responding speaker – Hon. John Falloon, Question No. 1, 6 September.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament [Hansard]. 1997. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates: Biosecurity Amendment Bill (No. 4): Third reading main speaker – Gavan Herlihy, 18 November.
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, T. 1992. White collars and gumboots: A history of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 1892–1992. Palmerston North, NZ: Dunmore Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2007. Agricultural policies in OECD countries: Monitoring and evaluation report. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Prévost, D. and Bossche, P. 2005. The agreement on the application of sanitary and phytosanitary measures. In P.F.J. Macrory, A.E. Appleton and M.G. Plummer, eds. The World Trade Organization: Legal, economic and political analysis: Vol. I. Boston, MA: Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.D. 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42: 427–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quiggin, J. 1998. Social democracy and market reform in Australia and New Zealand. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14: 76–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche, M.M., Johnston, T. and Le Heron, R.B. 1992. Farmers’ interest groups and agricultural policy in New Zealand during the 1980s. Environment and Planning A 24: 1749–67.
   Google Scholar
• Sandrey, R.A. and Scobie, G.M. 1994. Changing international competitiveness and trade: Recent experience in New Zealand agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76: 1041–46.
   Google Scholar
• Scrimgeour, F.G. and Pasour Junior, E.C. 1996. A public choice perspective on agricultural policy reform: Implications of the New Zealand experience. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 257–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. and Montgomery, H. 2004. Revolution or evolution? New Zealand agriculture since 1984. GeoJournal 59: 107–18.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, R. 1999. Bargaining with the strong: New Zealand and Australia's bilateral trade relations with the United States and the European Union. Political Science 51: 149–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. 2005. Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck and K. Thelen, eds. Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trampusch, C. and Spies, D.C. 2013. Agricultural interests and the origins of capitalism: A parallel comparative history of Germany, Denmark, New Zealand and the USA. New Political Economy. doi:10.1080/13563467.2013.861414
   Google Scholar
• Victor, D.G. 1999. The sanitary and phytosanitary agreement of the World Trade Organization: An assessment after five years. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 32: 865–937.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, M. 1995. The Biosecurity Act 1993 and the ‘thin green line’. New Zealand Law Journal December: 395–400.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, C. 2005. Science or protection? Australia's quarantine regime and the WTO. In P. Ramburuth and C. Welch, eds. Casebook in international business: Australian and Asia–Pacific perspectives. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.
   Google Scholar