The Borda Count and its real-world alternatives: Comparing scoring rules in Nauru and Slovenia

References

• Black, D. 1958. The theory of committees and elections. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, D. 1976. Partial justification of the Borda count. Public Choice 28: 1–15. doi: 10.1007/BF01718454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borda, J.–C. 1781. Memoire sur les elections au scrutin (Memoir on the ballot elections). Historie de l'Academie Royale des Sciences. URL: < http://gerardgreco.free.fr/IMG/pdf/MA_c_moire-Borda-1781.pdf>. Consulted 16 May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, F. 2005. Electoral systems – pros and cons. Unpublished paper No. 19. Fifth Forum Presiding Officers and Clerks Conference. 27–29 April, Samoa.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G. 1997. Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world's electoral systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. and Van Hees, M. 2007. In praise of manipulation. British Journal of Political Science 38: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dummett, M. 1997. Principles of electoral reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dummett, M. 1998. The Borda count and agenda manipulation. Social Choice and Welfare 15: 289–96. doi: 10.1007/s003550050105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, P. 2013. The original Borda count and partial voting. Social Choice and Welfare 40: 353–8. doi: 10.1007/s00355-011-0603-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feld, S. L. and Grofman, B. 1992. Who's afraid of the big bad cycle? Journal of Theoretical Politics 4: 231–7. doi: 10.1177/0951692892004002007
   Google Scholar
• Felsenthal, D. and Machover, M. 1998. The measurement of voting power: Theory and practice, problems and paradoxes. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fishburn, P. 1973. The theory of social choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbard, A. 1973. Manipulation of voting schemes: A general result. Econometrica 41: 587–601. doi: 10.2307/1914083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, M. 2005. Democratic systems round the world, 1946–2000. Electoral Studies 24: 103–21. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2004.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grofman, B., Lee, S., Winckler, E. and Woodall, B. eds. 1999. Elections in Japan, Korea and Taiwan under the single non-transferable vote: The comparative study of an embedded institution. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, H. 2006. Submission to the Constitutional Review Committee, Republic of Nauru. Unpublished paper.
   Google Scholar
• International Foundation for Electoral Systems [IFES]. 2013. Election guide. URL: < http://www.electionguide.org/countries/id/150/>. Consulted 13 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, G.A. and van Holsteyn, J.M. 2012. Strategic electoral considerations under proportional representation. Electoral Studies 31: 184–91. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Roy, K. 2010. Nauru's parliament in crisis. The Parliamentarian 91: 240–3.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. 1997. Disproportionality under alternative voting: The crucial – and puzzling – case of the Australian senate elections, 1919–1946. Acta Politica 32: 9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwin, W.G. 1978. Strategic voting and the Borda method. Public Choice 33: 85–90. doi: 10.1007/BF00123946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckelvey, R.D. and Niemi, R.G. 1978. Multistage game representation of sophisticated voting for binary procedures. Journal of Economic Theory 18: 1–22. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(78)90039-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, I. and Urken, A.B. 1995. Introduction. In I. McLean and A. Urken, eds. Classics of social choice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, S. 1984. A comparison of the efficiency of multicandidate electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science 28: 23–48. doi: 10.2307/2110786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanson, E.J. 1882. Methods of election. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 18L: 197–240.
   Google Scholar
• Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights [OSCE]. 2012. Republic of Slovenia: Early elections of the national assembly, 4 December 2011. OSCE/ODIHR Election Assessment Mission Final Report. URL: < http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/84559>. Consulted 28 February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Pacific Islands Forum. 2010. Report of the Pacific Islands forum election observer mission to the April 2010 Nauru general elections, 14 May. URL: < http://www.forumsec.org/resources/uploads/attachments/documents/Forum_Election_Observer_Report_Nauru_2010.pdf>. Consulted 16 May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. 2001a. Democracy in divided societies: Electoral engineering for conflict management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. 2001b. The Borda Count in the real world: The electoral system in the Republic of Nauru. Working Paper. Canterbury: Macmillan Brown Centre for Pacific Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. 2002. Social choice in the South Seas: Electoral innovation and the Borda count in the Pacific Island countries. International Political Science Review 23: 355–72. doi: 10.1177/0192512102023004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. 2011. Electoral system reform options for Northern Territory local government elections. Report prepared for the Northern Territory Department of Housing, Local Government and Regional Services. URL: < http://www.localgovernment.nt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/121319/Electoral_System_Reform_Options_for_Northern_Territory_Local_Government_Elections.pdf>. Consulted 28 February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. and Gratschew, M. 2001. Nauru. In D. Nohlen, F. Grotz and C. Hartmann, eds. Elections in Asia: A data handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of Slovenia. 2000. National assembly elections act (1992, amended). URL: < http://www.legislationline.org/documents/action/popup/id/3825>. Consulted 28 February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of Slovenia, Statistical Office. 2002. Population by ethnic affiliation, Slovenia, census 1953, 1961, 1971, 1981, 1991 and 2002. URL: < http://www.stat.si/popis2002/en/rezultati/rezultati_red.asp?ter=SLO&st=7>. Consulted 20 May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, A., Reilly, B. and Ellis, A. 2005. Electoral system design: The new international IDEA handbook. Stockholm: Institute for Democracy & Electoral Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Saari, D.G. 1990a. The Borda dictionary. Social Choice and Welfare 7: 279–317. doi: 10.1007/BF01376279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saari, D.G. 1990b. Susceptibility to manipulation. Public Choice 64: 21–41. doi: 10.1007/BF00125915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saari, D.G. 1994. Geometry of voting. New York: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Saari, D.G. 1995. Basic geometry of voting. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite, M.A. 1975. Strategy-proofness and arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. Journal of Economic Theory 10: 187–217. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(75)90050-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supreme Court of Nauru. 1977. In the matter of the Electoral Act 1965–1973 and in the matter of an election in the constituency of Ubenide. Miscellaneous Cause No. 15. URL: < http://www.paclii.org/nr/cases/NRSC/1977/4.html>. Consulted 20 May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tabarrok, A. and Spector, L. 1999. Would the Borda Count have avoided the civil war? Journal of Theoretical Politics 11: 261–88. doi: 10.1177/0951692899011002006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangian, A. 2013. Mathematical theory of democracy. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Toplak, J. 2006. The parliamentary elections in Slovenia, October 2004. Electoral Studies 25: 825–31. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsetlin, I., Regenwetter, M. and Grofman, B. 2003. The impartial culture maximizes the probability of majority cycles. Social Choice and Welfare 21: 387–98. doi: 10.1007/s00355-003-0269-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Trease, H. 1993. The presidential election. In H. Van Trease, ed. Atoll politics: The Republic of Kiribati. Christchurch: Macmillan Brown Centre for Pacific Studies, University of Canterbury.
   Google Scholar
• Young, H.P. 1974. An axiomatization of Borda's rule. Journal of Economic Theory 9: 43–52. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(74)90073-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, H.P. 1995. Optimal voting rules. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 51–64. doi: 10.1257/jep.9.1.51
   Google Scholar