Policy entrepreneurs and promotion of Australian state knowledge economies

References

• Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, M. and Stone, D. 2013a. The changing fortunes of a policy entrepreneur: The case of Ross Garnaut. Australian Journal of Political Science 48: 1–14. doi: 10.1080/10361146.2012.760526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, M. and Stone, D. 2013b. A reply to Jotzo and Hatfield-Dodds. Australian Journal of Political Science 48: 499–500. doi: 10.1080/10361146.2013.848506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, S. and Biermann, F. 2011. Towards adaptive management: Examining the strategies of policy entrepreneurs in Dutch water management. Ecology and Society 16 (4): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumby, J. 2010. Innovation festival forward. Australian Innovation Festival website. 7 April. URL: <http://www.ausinnovation.org/articles/john-brumby-innovation-festival-foreword.html>. Consulted 21 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M. and Castells, M. 2001. Globalisation, the knowledge society, and the network state: Poulantzas at the millennium. Global Networks 1: 1–18. doi: 10.1111/1471-0374.00002
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N. 2012. Policy entrepreneurs and the design of public policy: Conceptual framework and the case of national health insurance law in Israel. Journal of Social Research and Policy 3: 5–26.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. 2009. Impact assessment of the science technology and innovation initiative, Department of Innovation, Industry and Regional Development. Melbourne: Deloitte. URL: <http://monash.edu/pharm/assets/docs/2009-deloitte-report.pdf>. Consulted 21 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dodgson, M. and Staggs, J. 2012. Government policy, university strategy and the academic entrepreneur: The case of Queensland's Smart State institutes. Cambridge Journal of Economics 36: 567–85. doi: 10.1093/cje/bes004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2009. An introduction to qualitative research. 4th edn. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R.L. 2002. The rise of the creative class: And how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B.W. 2008. Three lenses of evidence-based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration 67: 1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00564.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jotzo, F. and Hatfield-Dodds, S. 2013. The impact of the Garnaut review on Australian climate policy: A comment. Australian Journal of Political Science 48: 495–98. doi: 10.1080/10361146.2013.848505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J.W. [1984] 2011. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Updated 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, C. 2004. Policy entrepreneurship in Australia: A conceptual review and application. Australian Journal of Political Science 39: 367–86. doi: 10.1080/1036114042000238564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. 1989. Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. 1997. Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science 41: 738–70. doi: 10.2307/2111674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. 2009. Universities in the knowledge economy: A comparative analysis of nested institutions. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 11: 327–53. doi: 10.1080/13876980903221072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. 2013. Policy entrepreneurs and controversial science: Governing human embryonic stem cell research. Journal of European Public Policy 20: 442–57. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.761514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. and Norman, P. 2009. Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal 37: 649–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. and Vergari, S. 1998. Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. The Journal of Politics 60: 126–48.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. and Wanna, J. 2006. Innovative state strategies in the antipodes: Enhancing the ability of governments to govern in the global context. Australian Journal of Political Science 41: 161–76. doi: 10.1080/10361140600672410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oborn, E., Barrett, M. and Exworthy, M. 2011. Policy entrepreneurship in the development of public sector strategy: The case of London health reform. Public Administration 89: 325–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01889.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. 2008. Governance and the entrepreneurial economy: A comparative analysis of three regions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 32: 833–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00258.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petridou, E. 2014. Theories of the policy process: Contemporary scholarship and future directions. Policy Studies Journal 42: S12–32. doi: 10.1111/psj.12054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P.A. 1988. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences 21: 129–68. doi: 10.1007/BF00136406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P.A. 1993. Policy change over a decade or more. In P.A. Sabatier and H.C. Jenkins-Smith, eds. Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury, C. 2011. Farm and quarry or Smart State? Queensland's economy since 1989. Queensland Review 18: 145–51.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 2006. Territory – Authority – Rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar