The second image traversed: Waltz's theory of foreign policyFootnote

^†The title alludes to Gourevitch's (Citation1978) highly influential study of ‘the second image reversed’, which in turn referenced Waltz's (Citation1959) account of the three levels of analysis.

References

• Allison, G. 1971. Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., Daddow, O. and Hall, I. 2013. Interpreting British foreign policy. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15: 163–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00537.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuning, M. 1995. Words and deeds: Foreign assistance rhetoric and policy behaviour in the Netherlands, Belgium, and the United Kingdom. International Studies Quarterly 39: 235–54. doi: 10.2307/2600848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuning, M. 2007. Foreign policy analysis: A comparative introduction. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Dobell, W.M. 1968. Review of Waltz, Foreign policy and democratic politics. Canadian Journal of Political Science 1: 235–36. doi: 10.1017/S0008423900036702
   Google Scholar
• Elman, C. 1996. Horses for courses: Why not neorealist theories of foreign policy? Security Studies 6: 7–53. doi: 10.1080/09636419608429297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, P. 1978. The second image reversed: The international sources of domestic politics. International Organization 32: 881–912. doi: 10.1017/S002081830003201X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, I. 2012. Dilemmas of decline: British intellectuals and world politics, 1945–1975. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, C.F. 1968. The comparative study of foreign policy. World Politics 20: 521–34. doi: 10.2307/2009780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, V.M. 2012. The history and evolution of foreign policy analysis. In S. Smith, A. Hadfield and T. Dunne, eds. Foreign policy: Theories, actors, cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. 1972. Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascos. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. 1976. Perceptions and misperceptions in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. 1987. The contributions of President Kenneth N. Waltz. PS: Political Science and Politics 20: 856–61. doi: 10.2307/419246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaarbo, J. 2003. Foreign policy analysis in the twenty-first century: Back to comparison, forward to identity and ideas. International Studies Review 5: 156–63.
   Google Scholar
• Kennan, G. 1954. Realities of American foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khong, Y.F. 1992. Analogies at war: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam decisions of 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kissinger, H. 1957. A world restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the problems of peace, 1812–1822. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann, W. 1943. U.S. foreign policy: Shield of the republic. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42: 427–60. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 1998. Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics 51: 144–72. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100007814
   Google Scholar
• Telbami, S. 2002. Kenneth Waltz, neorealism, and foreign policy. Security Studies 11: 158–70. doi: 10.1080/714005344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, K.N. 1959. Man, the state, and war: A theoretical analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K.N. 1967. Foreign policy and democratic politics: The American and British experience. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K.N. 1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K.N. 1981. The spread of nuclear weapons: More may be better. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K.N. 1986. Laws and theories. In R.O. Keohane, ed. Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K.N. 1996. International politics is not foreign policy. Security Studies 6: 54–57. doi: 10.1080/09636419608429298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, K.N. 2008. Realism and international politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K.N. and Fearon, J. 2012. A conversation with Kenneth Waltz. Annual Review of Political Science 15: 1–12. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-020511-174136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerfield, H.B. 1968. Review of Waltz, Foreign policy and democratic politics. Journal of Politics 30: 237–38. doi: 10.2307/2128332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F. 1992. Realism and domestic politics: A review essay. International Security 17: 177–98. doi: 10.2307/2539162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar