Classifying electoral systems by input rules: Building on Blais and Rae through Australian experience

References

• Blais, A. 1988. The classification of electoral systems. European Journal of Political Research 16(1): 99–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1988.tb00143.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bognador, V. 1983. Introduction. In V. Bognador and D. Butler, eds. Democracy and elections: Electoral systems and their political consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G.W. 1990. Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science 34: 903–35. doi: 10.2307/2111465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, G.W. 1991. SNTV and D'Hondt are equivalent. Electoral Studies 10: 118–32. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(91)90043-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, G.W. 1997. Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world's electoral systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dodgson, C. [1884] 1995. The principles of parliamentary representation. In I. McLean and A. Urken, eds. Classics of social choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, D.M. and McAllister, I. 2006. The Australian electoral system: Origins, variations and consequences. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. and Mitchell, P. eds. 2005. The politics of electoral systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, B.D. 1968. The choice of voting methods in federal politics, 1902–1918. In C.A. Hughes, ed. Readings in Australian government. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrop, M. and Miller, W.L. 1987. Elections and voters: A comparative introduction. London: Macmillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, J. 1992. Proportional representation: Critics of the British electoral system, 1820–1945. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakeman, E. 1974. How democracies vote: A study of electoral systems. London: Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. 1985. The field of electoral systems research: A critical survey. Electoral Studies 4: 3–14. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(85)90028-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. 1997. Disproportionality under Alternative Voting: The crucial – And puzzling – Case of the Australian Senate elections, 1919–1946. Acta Politica 32(1): 9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Massicote, L. and Blais, A. 1999. Mixed electoral systems: A conceptual and empirical survey. Electoral Studies 18: 341–66. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00063-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, I. 1996. EJ Nanson, social choice and electoral reform. Australian Journal of Political Science 31: 369–85. doi: 10.1080/10361149651102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, I., McMillan, A. and Monroe, B.L. eds. 1996. A mathematical approach to proportional representation: Duncan Black on Lewis Carroll. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2004. Electoral engineering: Voting rules and political behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, D.W. 1967. The political consequences of electoral laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. and Maley, M. 2000. The Single Transferable Vote and the Alternative Vote compared. In S. Bowler and B. Grofman, eds. Elections in Australia, Ireland and Malta under the single transferable vote: Reflections on an embedded institution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, A., Reilly, B., et al. 1997. The international IDEA handbook of electoral system design. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, A., Reilly, B., Ellis, A., et al. 2005. Electoral system design: The new international IDEA handbook. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, W. 2009. Fueling large group dominance and repeating past mistakes: A critique of the Northern Territory local government electoral system. Report 59. Alice Springs: Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, W. 2011. Alice's unrepresentative council: Cause for intervention? Australian Journal of Political Science 46: 699–706. doi: 10.1080/10361146.2011.623669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, M.S. and Wattenberg, M. eds. 2001. Mixed-member electoral systems: The best of both worlds? New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taagepera, R. and Shugart, M.S. 1989. Seats and votes: The effects and determinants of electoral systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. and Johnston, R. 1979. Geography of elections. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J.F.H. 1980. Mirror of the nation's mind: Australia's electoral experiments. Sydney: Hale & Iremonger.
   Google Scholar