Institutions, informality, and influence: explaining nuclear cooperation in the Australia-US alliance

References

• Ball, Desmond. 1980. A Suitable Piece of Real Estate: American Installations in Australia. Sydney: Hale and Iremonger.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Desmond. 1987. A Base for Debate: The US Satellite Station at Nurrungar. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Desmond. 1988. Pine Gap: Australia and the US Geostationary Signals Intelligence. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Desmond. 1999. Testimony to the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties, “Pine Gap”, 9 August.
   Google Scholar
• Barwick, Garfield. 1962. “Letter Sent by the Minister for External Affairs to the Acting Secretary-General of the United Nations Concerning Resolution 1664, 15 March”, tabled in Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates (House of Representatives). 5 April.
   Google Scholar
• Beazley, Kim. 2016. “Sovereignty and the US Alliance.” In Australia’s American Alliance, edited by Peter Dean, Stephan Frühling, and Brendan Taylor, 203–223. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckley, Michael. 2015. “The Myth of Entangling Alliances: Reassessing the Security Risks of US Defense Pacts.” International Security 39 (4): 7–48. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, Mark. 2003. “Australia’s Relationship with the United States: The Case for Greater Independence.” The Australian Journal of Political Science 38 (3): 387–405. doi: 10.1080/1036114032000133958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellany, Ian. 1972. Australia in the Nuclear Age: National Defence and National Development. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bisley, Nick. 2013. “’An Ally for All the Years to Come’: Why Australia is Not a Conflicted Ally.” The Australian Journal of International Affairs 67 (4): 403–418. doi: 10.1080/10357718.2013.803029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camilleri, Joseph. 1987. ANZUS: Australia’s Predicament in the Nuclear Age. Melbourne: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chubb, Danielle, and Ian McAllister. 2019. “Public Attitudes Towards the Future Defence of Australia.” In After American Primacy: Imagining the Future Defence of Australia, edited by Peter Dean, Stephan Frühling, and Brendan Taylor, 28–43. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, James. 2016. Fighting with America: Why Saying No to the US Wouldn’t Rupture the Alliance. Sydney: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Defence Committee. 1976. Australian Strategic Analysis and Defence Planning Objectives. Canberra: Australian Department of Defence. 2 September.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defence. 1993. Strategic Review 1993. Canberra: Defence Centre Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dibb, Paul. 2018. Into the Wilderness of Mirrors: Australia and the Threat from the Soviet Union in the Cold War and Russia Today. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frühling, Stephan. 2018a. “A Nuclear-armed Australia? Contemplating the Unthinkable Option.” Australian Foreign Affairs 4: 71–91.
   Google Scholar
• Frühling, Stephan. 2018b. “Is ANZUS Really an Alliance? Aligning the US and Australia.” Survival 60 (5): 199–218. doi: 10.1080/00396338.2018.1518384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, Matthew. 2012. Atomic Assistance: How “Atoms for Peace” Programs Cause Nuclear Insecurity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, Bill. 1996. Hayden: An Autobiography. Sydney: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Higgott, Richard. 2008. “International Political Institutions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by Sarah Binder, R. A. W. Rhodes, and Bert Rockman, 613–632. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Matthew. 2004. “The Radford Bombshell: Anglo-Australian-US Relations, Nuclear Weapons, and the Defence of Australia, 1954-57.” Journal of Strategic Studies 27 (4): 636–662. doi: 10.1080/1362369042000314547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Matthew. 2008. “Targeting China: US Nuclear Planning and ‘Massive Retaliation’ in East Asia, 1953-1955.” Journal of Cold War Studies 10 (4): 37–65. doi: 10.1162/jcws.2008.10.4.37
   Google Scholar
• Kelton, Maryanne. 2008. More than an Ally? Contemporary Australia-US Relations. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert, and Lisa Martin. 1995. “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory.” International Security 20 (1): 39–51. doi: 10.2307/2539214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanoszka, Alexander. 2018. Atomic Assurance: The Alliance Politics of Nuclear Proliferation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leah, Christine. 2016. “Deterrence Beyond Down Under: Australia and US Security Guarantees Since 1955.” The Journal of Strategic Studies 39 (4): 521–534. doi: 10.1080/01402390.2016.1168013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leah, Christine, and Rod Lyon. 2010. “Three Visions of the Bomb: Australian Thinking About Nuclear Weapons and Strategy.” The Australian Journal of International Affairs 64 (4): 449–477. doi: 10.1080/10357718.2010.489994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, David. 1993. “Australia and Allied Strategy in the Far East.” The Journal of Strategic Studies 16 (4): 511–538. doi: 10.1080/01402399308437531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, Vivien. 2010. “The Institutional Approach.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, edited by David March and Gerry Stoker, 60–79. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lowy Institute for International Policy. 2018. “Australia-US Relations”, https://lowyinstitutepoll.lowyinstitute.org/australia-us-relations/.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, Rod. 2008. “Australia: Back to the Future?” In The Long Shadow: Nuclear Weapons and Security in 21st Century Asia, edited by Muthiah Alagappa, 429–450. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, James, and Johan Olsen. 2008. “Elaborating the ‘New Institutionalism’.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by Sarah Binder, R. A. W. Rhodes, and Bert Rockman, 3–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John. 1995. “A Realist Reply: The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security 20 (1): 82–93. doi: 10.2307/2539218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John, and Stephen Walt. 2007. The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Charles. 2015. “Public Support for ANZUS: Evidence of a Generational Shift.” The Australian Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 442–461. doi: 10.1080/10361146.2015.1052370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills Rodrigo, Chris. 2019. “Prime Minister Says US Won’t Deploy Missiles in Australia.” The Hill, 5 August, https://thehill.com/policy/defense/456150-prime-minister-says-us-wont-deploy-missiles-in-australia.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Roy. 2017. “Australians View Terrorism and War as the Most Important Problems Facing the World After Terrorist Incidents and Rising Global Tensions.” 14 July, http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/7263-issues-facing-the-world-terrorism-verbatims-mid-2017-201707141606.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, Andrew. 2004. “Australia and the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone: A Reinterpretation.” The Australian Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 567–583. doi: 10.1080/103614042000295156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, Andrew. 2013. Asia, the US and Extended Nuclear Deterrence: Atomic Umbrellas in the Twenty-First Century. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton, Gregory. 1987. All the Way: Australia’s Road to Vietnam. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, Jeremy. 2008. Warring Friends: Alliance Restraint in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pyne, Christopher. 2019. “Ministerial Statement: Australia-United States Joint Facilities.” Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates (House of Representatives), 20 February.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter, Dan. 1994. “Learning, Realism, and Alliances: The Weight of the Shadow of the Past.” World Politics 46 (2): 490–526. doi: 10.2307/2950716
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Wayne. 1999. “The Wars that Were Planned: Australia’s Forward Defence Posture in Asia and the Role of Tactical Nuclear Weapons, 1945-1967.” The Australian Journal of International Affairs 53 (3): 295–309. doi: 10.1080/00049919993872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Wayne. 2000. Australia’s Bid for the Atomic Bomb. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sechser, Todd. 2010. “Goliath’s Curse: Coercive Threats and Asymmetric Power.” International Organization 64 (4): 627–660. doi: 10.1017/S0020818310000214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepsle, Kenneth. 2008. “Rational Choice Institutionalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by Sarah Binder, R. A. W. Rhodes, and Bert Rockman, 23–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Stephen. 2013. “Ministerial Statement: Full Knowledge and Concurrence.” Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates (House of Representatives), 26 June.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, Glenn. 1997. Alliance Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, Jonathan. 2018. “What Did We Want? Debates within the Australian Nuclear Disarmament Movement in the 1980s.” Labour History 115: 145–165. doi: 10.5263/labourhistory.115.0145
   Google Scholar
• Tillet, Andrew. 2017. “North Korea Threatens Australia with ‘Disaster’ Over Opposition to Nuke Program.” The Australian Financial Review, 15 October, https://www.afr.com/news/north-korea-threatens-australia-with-disaster-over-opposition-to-nuke-program-20171015-gz14zj.
   Google Scholar
• US Congress. 2019. John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20109. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5515/text.
   Google Scholar
• US Space Command. 1990. “Background Paper on Australian Implementing Arrangement – Deputy Commander Controversy.” April 19. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu//NSAEBB/NSAEBB235/20.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• US State Department. 1965. “Addendum INR Contribution to NIE 4-65 Likelihood of Further Nuclear Proliferation.” 4 November. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB155/prolif-11b.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wallander, Celeste, and Robert Keohane. 1999. “Risk, Threat and Security Institutions.” In Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions Over Time and Space, edited by Helga Haftendorn, 21–48. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, Jim. 1997. “Surprise Down Under: The Secret History of Australia’s Nuclear Ambitions.” The Nonproliferation Review 5 (1): 1–20. doi: 10.1080/10736709708436690
   Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen. 2018. “US Strategy after the Cold War: Can Realism Explain It? Should Realism Guide It?” International Relations 32 (1): 3–22. doi: 10.1177/0047117817753272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar