Party system fragmentation, social cleavages, and social media: New Zealand’s 2017 election campaign on Facebook

References

• Barker, Fiona, and Elizabeth McLeay. 2000. “How Much Change? An Analysis of the Initial Impact of Proportional Representation on the New Zealand Parliamentary Party System.” Party Politics 6 (2): 131–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, Daniel. 1988. The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. Lance. 1990. “Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States.” Journal of Communication 40 (2): 103–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. Lance, and Shanto Iyengar. 2008. “A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication.” Journal of Communication 58 (4): 707–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biessmann, Felix. 2016. “Automating Political Bias Prediction.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.02195 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Bilbao-Jayo, Aritz, and Aitor Almeida. 2018. “Automatic Political Discourse Analysis with Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Networks and Contextual Data.” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 14 (11): 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundidge, Jennifer. 2010. “Encountering ‘Difference’ in the Contemporary Public Sphere: The Contribution of the Internet to the Heterogeneity of Political Discussion Networks.” Journal of Communication 60 (4): 680–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, David Robertson, and Derek Hearl, eds. 1987. Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Colleoni, Elanor, Alessandro Rozza, and Adam Arvidsson. 2014. “Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data: Political Homophily on Twitter.” Journal of Communication 64 (2): 317–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W. 1990. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 903–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W., Frances McCall Rosenbluth, and Michael F. Thies. 1999. “Electoral Reform and the Fate of Factions: The Case of Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party.” British Journal of Political Science 29 (1): 33–56.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, Jennifer, and Raymond Miller. 2010. “New Zealand’s Party System: A Multi-Party Mirage?” In Key to Victory: The New Zealand General Election of 2008, edited by Stephen Levine and Nigel S. Roberts, 120–136. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J., and Martin P. Wattenberg, eds. 2002. Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. 1957. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy 65 (2): 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Translated by Barbara North and Robert North. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Elder, Edward, and Justin B. Phillips. 2017. “Appeals to the Hispanic demographic: Targeting through Facebook autoplay videos by the Clinton campaign during the 2015/2016 presidential primaries.” Journal of Political Marketing 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Leon D. 1967. Political Parties in Western Democracies. New York: Prager.
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. 2016. “Fast Text.” https://fasttext.cc/.
   Google Scholar
• Fiscella, Kevin, and Allen M. Fremont. 2006. “Use of Geocoding and Surname Analysis to Estimate Race and Ethnicity.” Health Services Research 41 (4): 1482–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, Peter, and Jim McAloon. 2016. Labour: The New Zealand Labour Party 1916-2016. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fyers, Andy, and Henry Cooke. 2017. “Facebook Is New Zealand’s Second-Favourite Leisure Activity.” Stuff, March 23. https://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/90005751/Facebook-is-New-Zealands-second-favourite-leisure-activity.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin, Todd. 2003. The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making & Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmer, Justin, and Brandon M. Stewart. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21 (3): 267–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, Daniel C. 1986. The “Uncensored War”: The Media and Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto. 1987. “Television News and Citizens’ Explanations of National Affairs.” The American Political Science Review 81 (3): 815–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, and Kyu S Hahn. 2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication 59 (1): 19–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, Jeffrey A., and Susan A. Banducci. 2002. “Issues and Party Competition Under Alternative Electoral Systems.” Party Politics 8 (1): 123–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. “The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems.” In Political Parties and Political Development, edited by Myron Weiner and Joseph LaPalombara, 177–200. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Richard I. Hoffbert, and Ian Budge. 1994. Parties, Polices, and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera. 1979. ““Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and W. Ben Hunt. 1992. Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and John Garry. 2000. “Estimating Policy Positions From Political Texts.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 619–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, Stephen, and Nigel S. Roberts. 1993. “The New Zealand Electoral Referendum of 1992.” Electoral Studies 12 (2): 158–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. 1987. “The Demise of the Last Westminster System? Comments on the Report of New Zealand’s Royal Commission on the Electoral System.” Electoral Studies 6 (2): 97–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, David. 2010. “Conscience Voting: Who Decides?” In New Zealand Government and Politics. 5th ed., edited by Raymond Miller, 255–267. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Stein Rokkan. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipson, Leslie. 1959. “Party Systems in the United Kingdom and the Older Commonwealth: Causes, Resemblances, and Variations.” Political Studies 7 (1): 12–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, Will, Kenneth Benoit, Slava Mikhaylov, and Michael Laver. 2011. “Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36 (1): 123–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter, and Richard S Katz. 1997. “Party Organisation, Party Democracy, and the Emergence of the Cartel Party.” In Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations, edited by Peter Mair, 93–119. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marder, Ben, Emma Slade, David Houghton, and Chris Archer-Brown. 2016. ““I Like Them, but Won’t ‘Like’ Them”: An Examination of Impression Management Associated with Visible Political Party Affiliation on Facebook.” Computers in Human Behavior 61: 280–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, Ian, and Raymond Miller. 2012. Democratic Decline and Democratic Renewal: Political Change in Britain, Australia and New Zealand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, Maxwell E., and Donald L. Shaw. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (2): 176–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhaylov, Slava, Michael Laver, and Kenneth R. Benoit. 2012. “Coder Reliability and Misclassification in the Human Coding of Party Manifestos.” Political Analysis 20 (1): 78–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Raymond. 2005. Party Politics in New Zealand. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Raymond. 2006. “New Zealand First.” In New Zealand Government and Politics. 4th ed., edited by Raymond Miller, 377–391. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Culture and Heritage. 2014. “The Road to MMP.” https://nzhistory.govt.nz/politics/fpp-to-mmp.
   Google Scholar
• Mosner, Robert G., Ethan Scheiner, and Heather Stoll. 2018. “Social Diversity, Electoral Systems, and the Party System.” In The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems, edited by Erik S. Herron, Robert J. Pekkanen, and Matthew S. Shugart, 135–158. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, Wolfgang C., and Kaare Strom, eds. 1999. Policy, Office, or Votes?: How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, Jack H. 1994a. “How Many Parties Will New Zealand Have Under MMP?” Political Science 46 (2): 139–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, Jack H. 1994b. “What Political Scientists Can Learn From the 1993 Electoral Reform in New Zealand.” PS: Political Science and Politics 27 (3): 525–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, Jack H. 2012. “Evaluating Democracy in New Zealand Under MMP.” Policy Quarterly 8 (2): 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Neto, Octavio Amorim, and Gary W. Cox. 1997. “Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 149–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohlen, Dieter. 1984. “Changes and Choices in Electoral Systems.” In Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives, edited by Arend Lijphart and Bernard Grofman, 217–224. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 1995. “Introduction: The Politics of Electoral Reform.” International Political Science Review 16 (1): 3–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordeshook, Peter C., and Olga V. Shvetsova. 1994. “Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 100–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organisation and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pariser, Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding From You. London: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Justin Bonest. 2019. “Negative Political Communication on Social Media and the Gender Gap: A Study of Men's and Women's Reactions to Presidential Candidate Attacks on Facebook in 2012 and 2016.” Politics & Gender 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, Joshua D., and Johanna L. Dunaway. 2016. “Reinforcing or Breaking Party Systems? Internet Communication Technologies and Party Competition in Comparative Context.” Political Communication 33 (3): 392–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, Douglas. 1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, Douglas W., and Michael Taylor. 1970. The Analysis of Political Cleavages. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Alan D. 1967. “Class Voting in New Zealand: A Comment on Alford’s Comparison of Class Voting in the Anglo-American Political Systems.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, edited by Seymour M. Lipset and Stein Rokkan, 95–114. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakamoto, Takayuki. 1999. “Explaining Electoral Reform: Japan Versus Italy and New Zealand.” Party Politics 5 (4): 419–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, Susan. 2000. “Parties Without Members? Party Organisation in a Changing Electoral Environment.” In Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, edited by Russell J. Dalton and Martin P. Wattenberg, 79–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, Nate, and Allison McCann. 2014. “How to Tell Someone’s Age When All You Know Is Her Name.” http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-to-tell-someones-age-when-all-you-know-is-her-name/.
   Google Scholar
• Slapin, Jonathan B., and Sven-Oliver Proksch. 2008. “A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions From Texts.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 705–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll, Heather. 2008. “Social Cleavages and the Number of Parties: How the Measures You Choose Affect the Answers You Get.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (11): 1439–1465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll, Heather. 2013. Changing Societies, Changing Party Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass R. 2007. Republic.Com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taagepera, Rein, and Bernard Grofman. 1985. “Rethinking Duverger’s Law: Predicting the Effective Number of Parties in Plurality and PR Systems - Parties Minus Issues Equals One.*.” European Journal of Political Research 13 (4): 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, Morgan. 2015. “How Many Kiwis Use Facebook?” New Zealand Herald, April 22. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11436706.
   Google Scholar
• Vaz de Melo, Pedro O. S. 2015. “How Many Political Parties Should Brazil Have? A Data-Driven Method to Assess and Reduce Fragmentation in Multi-Party Political Systems.” PLOS ONE 10 (10): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vowles, Jack. 1995. “The Politics of Electoral Reform in New Zealand.” International Political Science Review 16 (1): 95–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vowles, Jack, ed. 2014. The New Electoral Politics in New Zealand: The Significance of the 2011 Election. Wellington: Institute for Policy and Government Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, Annika, Onawa Lacewell, and Andrea Volkens. 2014. Manifesto Project: Manifesto Coding Instructions: Fifth Fully Revised Edition. https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/down/papers/handbook_2014_version_5.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, John. 2010. “Green Party.” In New Zealand Government and Politics. 5th ed., edited by Raymond Miller, 497–508. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, Magdalena E., and Diana C. Mutz. 2009. “Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement?” Journal of Communication 59 (1): 40–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolinetz, Steven B., ed. 1998. Party Systems. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar