A return to the classics? The implementation of royal commissions in Australia

References

• Acland, Henry. 1980. “Research as Stage Management: The Case of the Plowdon Committee.” In Social Research and Royal Commissions, edited by M. Bulmer, 19–34. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Althaus, Catherine. 1994. “Legitimation and Agenda Setting: Development and the Environment in Australia and Canada’s North.” In Royal Commissions and the Making of Public Policy, edited by P. Weller, 186–197. Brisbane: Centre for Australian Public Sector Management.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, Chris. 1982. Reasoning, Learning, and Action: Individual and Organizational. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, Chris, and Donald Schön. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, Adam. 1990. “Reckoning Schemes of Legitimation: On Commissions of Inquiry as Power/Knowledge Forms.” Journal of Historical Sociology 3: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P., and M. S. Baratz. 1970. Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birkland, Thomas A. 1997. After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy and Focusing Events. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boin, Arjen, Allan McConnell, and Paul ‘t Hart. 2008. Governing After Crises: The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brändström, Annika, and Sanneke Kuipers. 2003. “From Normal Incidents to Political Crises; Understanding the Selective Politicization of Policy Failures.” Government and Opposition 3: 279–305.
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, M. 1980. Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Clokie, Hugh M., and J. William Robinson. 1937. Royal Commissions of Inquiry: The Significance of Investigations in British Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gosnell, H. F. 1934. “British Royal Commissions of Inquiry.” Political Science Quarterly 49: 84–118.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Samantha, and Lorne Sossin. 2013. “Administrative Justice and Innovation: Beyond the Adversarial/Inquisitorial Dichotomy’.” In The Nature of Inquisitorial Processes in Administrative Regimes, edited by L. Jacobs and S. Baglay, 71–92. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, Gunnel. 1983. “Symbolic and Pseudo Policies as Responses to Diffusion of Power.” Policy Sciences 15 (3): 269–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, Alan P. 1961. “Anything but Action? A Study of the Uses and Abuses of Committees of Inquiry.” In Radical Reaction: Essays in Competition and Affluence, edited by Ralph Harris, 249–302. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Greg. 2016. Final Update on the Government’s Response to the Royal Commission Into the Home Insulation Program. Canberra: Commonwealth Government of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Inwood, Gregory J., and Carolyn M. Johns. 2014. Commission of Inquiry and Policy Change: A Comparative Analysis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, Ray, Timothy O’Riordan, and Michael Purdue. 1984. “Investigation as Legitimacy: The Maturing of the Big Public Inquiry.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 15 (3): 477–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Marceau. 1994. “The Correct Use of Commissions.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 60: 505–511.
   Google Scholar
• Marier, Patrik. 2017. “Public Inquiries.” In Routledge Handbook of Comparative Policy Analysis, edited by M. Brans, I. Geva-May, and M. Howlett, 169–180. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, Allan. 2020. “The Use of Placebo Policies to Escape from Policy Traps.” Journal of European Public Policy 27 (7): 957–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, Charles, and Sander Dekker. 2008. “September 11 and the Post-Crisis Investigation: Exploring the Role and Impact of the 9/11 Commission.” In Governing After Crisis: The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning, edited by A. Boin, A. McConnell, and P. ‘t Hart, 255–284. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prasser, Scott. 1994. “Royal Commissions and Public Inquiries: Scopes and Uses.” In Royal Commissions and the Making of Public Policy, edited by P. Weller, 1–21. Brisbane: Centre for Australian Public Sector Management.
   Google Scholar
• Prasser, Scott. 2006. Royal Commissions and Public Inquiries in Australia. Chatswood, Australia: LexisNexis Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Prasser, Scott. 2021. Royal Commissions and Public Inquiries in Australia (2nd ed.). Victoria: Lexis Nexis.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shergold, Peter. 2010. “Report to the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, The Hon. Tony Burke M.P. On the Implementation of The Callinan Inquiry.” http://www.agriculture.gov.au/pests-diseases-weeds/animal/eiimplementation.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, Alastair 2018. Public Inquiries, Policy Learning and the Threat of Future Crises. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, Alastair 2020. “Left on the Shelf: Explaining the Failure of Public Inquiry Recommendations.” Public Administration 98 (3): 609–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, Alastair, and Sophie Yates. 2021. “Public Inquiries as Procedural Policy Tools.” Policy and Society 40 (3): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulitzeanu-Kenan, Raanan. 2010. “Reflection in the Shadow of Blame: When Do Politicians Appoint Commissions of Inquiry?” British Journal of Political Science 40: 613–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, Sidney, and Beatrice Webb. 1932. Methods of Social Study. London: Longman, Green and Co.
   Google Scholar