A typology of civil society organisation activities: a multi-grounded theory approach to what CSOs do

References

• ACNC. 2023. Australian Charities Report [9th ed.]. Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2017. The Drama of Social Life. Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, Nicole. 2018. The State and Civil Society. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, Nicole. 2021. “Civil Society – Politically Engaged or Member-Serving? A Governance Perspective.” European Union Politics 22 (3): 495–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165211000439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. “Constructing Grounded Theory.” In Introducing Qualitative Methods. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Civil Society Futures. 2018. Civil Society in England – Its current state and future opportunity. Civil Society Futures – The Independent Inquiry. https://www.phf.org.uk/programmes/inquiry-future-civil-society.
   Google Scholar
• Coram, Veronica, Jonathon Louth, Selina Tually, and Ian Goodwin-Smith. 2021. “Community Service Sector Resilience and Responsiveness during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Australian Experience.” Australian Journal of Social Issues 56 (4): 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. 1978. “Pluralism Revisited.” Comparative Politics 10 (2): 191–203. https://doi.org/10.2307/421645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John S. 2002. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019925043X.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Foote, Wendy L., Amy Conley Wright, Jennifer Mason, and Tracy McEwan. 2023. “Collaboration between Australian Peak Bodies and Governments in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: New Ways of Interacting.” Australian Journal of Social Issues February: ajs4.260. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.260.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, Archon. 2003. “Associations and Democracy: Between Theories, Hopes, and Realities.” Annual Review of Sociology 29 (1): 515–539. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, Archon. 2005. “Deliberation before the Revolution: Toward an Ethics of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World.” Political Theory 33 (3): 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591704271990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garton, Jonathan. 2009. The Regulation of Organised Civil Society. Oxford: Hart Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 2010. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. 5. Paperback print. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Goldkuhl, Göran, and Stefan Cronholm. 2010. “Adding Theoretical Grounding to Grounded Theory: Toward Multi-Grounded Theory.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 9 (2): 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691000900205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpin, Darren R. 2006. “The Participatory and Democratic Potential and Practice of Interest Groups: Between Solidarity and Representation.” Public Administration 84 (4): 919–940. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00618.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpin, Darren R. 2010. Groups, Representation and Democracy Between Promise and Practice. Oxford: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Matthew. 2014. Charity Law and the Liberal State. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139136358.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, Bonnie. 2017. Public Things: Democracy in Disrepair. Fordham University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823276431.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, Bonnie, and Marc Stears. 2011. “The New Realism: From Modus Vivendi to Justice.” In Political Philosophy versus History, edited by Jonathan Floyd and Marc Stears, 177–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, John. 2020. “Hopes for Civil Society.” Global Perspectives 1 (1): 14130. https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2020.14130.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, John. 2022. The Shortest History of Democracy. Collingwood, Vic: Black Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, William A., Grant Jordan, and Andrew M. McLaughlin. 1994. “Interest Groups and Public Policy: The Insider/Outsider Model Revisited.” Journal of Public Policy 14 (1): 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00001239.
   Google Scholar
• Medearis, John. 2015. Why Democracy Is Oppositional. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minkoff, Debra C. 2002. “The Emergence of Hybrid Organizational Forms: Combining Identity-Based Service Provision and Political Action.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 31 (3): 377–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764002313004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogus, Jason, and Tom Liacus. 2016. Networked Change: How Progressive Campaigns Are Won in the 21st Century. NetChange Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, Namkyung, Minshuai Ding, and Yunkwon Kim. 2024. “How Do Non-Western Authoritarian Countries Respond to Disasters? Structural Difference from the Pluralistic Model.” International Review of Administrative Sciences March, https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523241231703.
   Google Scholar
• Onyx, Jenny, Lisa Armitage, Bronwen Dalton, Rose Melville, John Casey, and Robin Banks. 2010. “Advocacy with Gloves on: The ‘Manners’ of Strategy Used by Some Third Sector Organizations Undertaking Advocacy in NSW and Queensland.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 21 (1): 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-009-9106-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina, Sonia, and Erica Foldy. 2010. “Building Bridges from the Margins: The Work of Leadership in Social Change Organizations.” The Leadership Quarterly 21 (2): 292–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Our Community. n.d. CLASSIE-A Classification system for Social Sector Initiatives and Entities. Our Community. Accessed January 22, 2024, from https://www.ourcommunity.com.au/classie.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Ruth, and Ian Murray. 2023. “The Third Sector and Democracy in Australia: Neoliberal Governance and the Repression of Advocacy.” Australian Journal of Political Science May: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2023.2213215.
   Google Scholar
• Pill, Madeleine C. 2019. “Embedding in the City? Locating Civil Society in the Philanthropy of Place.” Community Development Journal 54 (2): 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsx020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. 2010. Contribution of the Not-for-Profit Sector. Canberra: Australian Government Productivity Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy 6 (1): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Riboldi, Mark, Lisa Fennis, and Marc Stears. 2022. Nurturing Links Across Civil Society – The Australian For-Purpose Sector’s Response to COVID-19. Sydney Policy Lab, The University of Sydney. https://www.sydney.edu.au/sydney-policy-lab/our-research/nurturing-links-across-civil-society.html.
   Google Scholar
• Seibert, Krystian, Alexandra Williamson, and Michael Moran. 2021. “Voluntary Sector Peak Bodies during the COVID-19 Crisis: A Case Study of Philanthropy Australia.” Voluntary Sector Review 12 (1): 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080520X16081188403865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simo, Gloria, and Angela L. Bies. 2007. “The Role of Nonprofits in Disaster Response: An Expanded Model of Cross-Sector Collaboration.” Public Administration Review 67 (s1): 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00821.x.
   Google Scholar
• Tarozzi, Massimiliano. 2020. What Is Grounded Theory? Bloomsbury ACADEMIC. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350085275.
   Google Scholar
• Tattersall, Amanda. 2010. Power in Coalition: Strategies for Strong Unions and Social Change. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Vromen, Ariadne. 2005. “Political Strategies of the Australian Third Sector.” Third Sector Review 11 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Warren, Mark. 2001. Democracy and Association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wearring, Andrew, Bronwen Dalton, and Rachel Bertram. 2021. “Pivoting Post-Pandemic: Not-for-Profit Arts and Culture Organisations and a New Focus on Social Impact.” Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal 13 (2), https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v13.i2.7729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolin, Sheldon S. 2018. Fugitive Democracy and Other Essays. Edited by Nicholas Xenos. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar