Parties vs. partisans: the real contest about what memes mean in election campaigns

References

• Baulch, E., A. Matamoros-Fernández, and F. Suwana. 2024. “Memetic Persuasion and WhatsAppification in Indonesia’s 2019 Presidential Election.” New Media & Society 26 (5): 2473–2491. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221088274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., A. Segerberg, and C. B. Knüpfer. 2018. “The Democratic Interface: Technology, Political Organization, and Diverging Patterns of Electoral Representation.” Information, Communication & Society 21 (11): 1655–1680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burroughs, B. 2020. “Fake Memetics: Political Rhetoric and Circulation in Political Campaigns.” In Fake News: Understanding Media and Misinformation in the Digital Age, edited by M. Zimdars, and K. McLeod, 191–200. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2022, April 30. “Labor and the Liberals are waging an election meme war – but what is the point?” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/may/01/labor-and-the-liberals-are-waging-an-election-meme-war-but-what-is-the-point.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, S., I. McAllister, S. Jackman, and J. Sheppard. 2022. The 2022 Australian Federal Election: Results from the Australian Election Study. Canberra: Australian National University. https://australianelectionstudy.org/wp-content/uploads/The-2022-Australian-Federal-Election-Results-from-the-Australian-Election-Study.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, M. 2022, April 12. ScoMo’s ‘worst nightmare’: The $74k meme factory that could change the election. Yahoo News. https://au.news.yahoo.com/scott-morrison-worst-nightmare-federal-election-meme-factory-082116526.html.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. 2019. “Sorted for Memes and Gifs: Visual Media and Everyday Digital Politics.” Political Studies Review 17 (3): 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918807483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, N. 2014. “It’s Supposed to Look Like Shit: The Internet Ugly Aesthetic.” Journal of Visual Culture 13 (3): 314–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914544516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, N., L. Shifman, and Z. Kampf. 2016. “It Gets Better”: Internet Memes and the Construction of Collective Identity.” New Media & Society 18 (8): 1698–1714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814568784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galipeau, T. 2023. “The Impact of Political Memes: A Longitudinal Field Experiment.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 20 (4): 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2150737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauja, A., and J. McSwiney. 2019. “Do Australian Parties Represent?” In Do Parties Still Represent? An Analysis of the Representativeness of Political Parties in Western Democracies, edited by K. Heidar, and B. Wauters, 47–65. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gauja, A., M. Sawer, and J. Sheppard. 2023. “Watershed: The 2022 Australian Federal Election.” In Watershed: The 2022 Australian Federal Election, edited by A. Gauja, M. Sawer, and J. Sheppard, 1–20. Canberra: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K. 2015. “Party Change, Social Media and the Rise of ‘Citizen-Initiated’ Campaigning.” Party Politics 21 (2): 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K. 2020. When the Nerds go Marching in: How Digital Technology Moved from the Margins to the Mainstream. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Y., and L. Shifman. 2017. “Making Sense? The Structure and Meanings of Digital Memetic Nonsense.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (6): 825–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1291702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Know Your Meme. 2015. “Normie.” Know Your Meme. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/normie.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. 2016. Prototype Politics: Technology-Intensive Campaigning and the Data of Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2018. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, I. 2023. “Party Explanations for the 2022 Australian Election Result.” Australian Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2023.2257611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey, F., S. DeJong, and J. Frenzel. 2023. “Memes, Scenes and #ELXN2019s: How Partisans Make Memes During Elections.” New Media & Society 25 (7): 1626–1647. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211020690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, L., and R. Southern. 2021. “By any Memes Necessary? Small Political Acts, Incidental Exposure and Memes During the 2017 UK General Election.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 23 (1): 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120930594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSwiney, J. 2021. “Social Networks and Digital Organisation: Far Right Parties at the 2019 Australian Federal Election.” Information, Communication & Society 23 (10): 1401–1418. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1757132.
   Google Scholar
• Mcswiney, J. 2024. Far-right Political Parties in Australia: Disorganisation and Electoral Failure. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McSwiney, J., and Sengul, K.. 2024. “Humor, Ridicule, and the Far Right: Mainstreaming Exclusion Through Online Animation.” Television & New Media 25 (4): 315–333https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764231213816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSwiney, J., M. Vaughan, A. Heft, and M. Hoffman. 2021. “Sharing the Hate? Memes and Transnationality in the Far Right’s Digital Visual Culture.” Information, Communication & Society 24 (16): 2502–2521. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1961006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, R. M. 2016. The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miltner, K. M. 2014. "There’s no place for lulz on LOLCats”: The role of genre, gender, and group identity in the interpretation and enjoyment of an Internet meme. First Monday.
   Google Scholar
• Moody-Ramirez, M., and A. B. Church. 2019. “Analysis of Facebook Meme Groups Used During the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Social Media + Society 5 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118808799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, A., and L. Shifman. 2017. “Internet Memes as Contested Cultural Capital: The Case of 4chan’s /b/ Board.” New Media & Society 19 (4): 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815609313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, A., and L. Shifman. 2018. “Meme Templates as Expressive Repertoires in a Globalizing World: A Cross-Linguistic Study.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 23 (5): 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieder, B., R. Abdulla, T. Poell, R. Woltering, and L. Zack. 2015. “Data Critique and Analytical Opportunities for Very Large Facebook Pages: Lessons Learned from Exploring “We are all Khaled Said.”.” Big Data & Society 2 (2): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715614980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2016. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Seiffert-Brockmann, J., T. Diehl, and L. Dobusch. 2018. “Memes as Games: The Evolution of a Digital Discourse Online.” New Media & Society 20 (8): 2862–2879. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817735334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shifman, L. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzberg, B. H. 2014. “Toward a Model of Meme Diffusion (M3D).” Communication Theory 24 (3): 311–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. 2022, May 10. “The Greems”: How the Greens harnessed online chaos to power a digital campaign. Crikey. https://www.crikey.com.au/2022/05/10/australian-greens-social-media-federal-election/.
   Google Scholar