The nature and process of science and applications to geography education: a US perspective

References

• Allen, T.R. (2008). Digital terrain visualization and virtual globes for teaching geomorphology. Journal of Geography, 106(6), 253–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2002). Nature-based excursions: School students’ perceptions of learning in natural environments. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11(3), 218–236.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., Vaughn, M.H., Strauss, E., & Cotter, L. (2011). Urban environmental education: Leveraging technology and ecology to engage students in studying the environment. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 20(3), 199–214.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarz, S.W. (1999). Fieldwork in K-12 geography in the United States. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 8(2), 164–170.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarz, S.W. (2003). Nine years on: Examining implementation of the National Geography Standards. Journal of Geography, 102(3), 99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodzin, A.M., & Anastasio, D. (2006). Using web-based GIS for earth and environmental systems education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54(3), 297–300.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G.E.P., & Draper, N.R. (1987). Empirical model building and response surfaces. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J.B. (2008). GloVis as a resource for teaching geographic content and concepts. Journal of Geography, 106(6), 239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, T. (2012). Undergraduate teaching and learning in physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography, 36(3), 305–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, J.E. (2007, Spring). Bring back geography. ArcNews Online, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Freidman, T. (2005). The world is flat. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Tucson, AZ: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geography Education National Implementation Project. (2012). Geography for life: National Geography Standards (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Geographic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Golledge, R.G. (2002). The nature of geographic knowledge. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartshorne, R. (1955). The nature of geography. The Professional Geographer, 7(5), 6.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, R.M., & Leonard, W.H. (2005). Mathematical modeling in science: Using spreadsheets to create mathematical models and address scientific inquiry. Science Teacher, 72(5), 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., Dukerich, L., & Hestenes, D. (2008). Modeling instruction: An effective model for science education. Science Educator, 17(1), 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kudryavtsev, A., Krasny, M.E., & Stedman, R.C. (2012). The impact of environmental education on sense of place among urban youth. Ecosphere, 3(4), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, J.S. (2009). Teaching scientific inquiry. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, M., & Barton, A.C. (2006). Science learning and a sense of place in a urban middle school. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(1), 107–142.
   Google Scholar
• Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. New York, NY: Algonquin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mayes, R., & Koballa Jr., T.R. (2012). Exploring the science framework. Science Scope, 36(4), 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Meisenzahl, R., & Mokyr, J. (2011). Is education policy innovation policy. VoxEU.org/index, p. 13.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies Press. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment Governing Board. (2010). Geography framework for the 2010 National Assessment of Education Progress. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Geographic Society. (2012). The state of geography education in America. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ornek, F. (2008). Models in science education: Applications of models in learning and teaching science. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(2), 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2010). Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say? New York, NY: McGraw-Hill International.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, T.C. (2007). Google Earth as a (not just) geography education tool. Journal of Geography, 106(4), 145–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanger, M. (1997). Viewpoint: Sense of place and education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(1), 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Starling, P.E. (2011). An investigation of unstructured play in nature and its effect on children's self-efficacy. Doctorate is Social Work Dissertations, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Tadaki, M., Salmond, J., Le Heron, R., & Brierley, G. (2012). Nature, culture, and the work of physical geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(4), 547–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trimble, S., & Nabhan, G. (1995). The geography of childhood: Why children need wild places? Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, T. (2012). Creating innovators: The making of young people who will change the world. New York, NY: SimonandSchuster.com.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, Z., Hu, J., Tan, G., & Sun, C. (2009). The application of Google Earth in education. Wuhan, China: Education Technology and Computer Science.
   Google Scholar