1,127
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Experienced geography teachers’ PCK of students’ ideas and beliefs about learning and teaching

References

  • Arnaudin, M., & Mintzes, J. (1985). Students’ alternative conceptions of the human circulatory system: A cross-age study. Science Education, 69, 721–733. doi:10.1002/sce.3730690513
  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2013). Australian curriculum: Geography. Sydney: Author.
  • Berg, T., & Brouwer, W. (1991). Teacher awareness of student alternative conceptions about rotational motion and gravity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 3–18. doi:10.1002/tea.3660280103
  • Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Brooks, C. (2006). Geographical knowledge and teaching geography. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 15(4), 353–369. doi:10.2167/irg200.0
  • de Jong, O., & van Driel, J. (2001). The development of prospective teachers’ concerns about teaching chemistry topics at a macro-micro-symbolic interface. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Graber, M. Komorek, & A. Kross (Eds.), Research in science education – past, present, and future (pp. 271–276). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • Dove, J.E. (1998). Alternative conceptions about the weather. School Science Review, 79(289), 65–69.
  • Dove, J.E. (1999). Theory into practice: Immaculate misconceptions. Sheffield , UK: Geographical Association.
  • Dove, J.E., Everett, L.A., & Preece, P.F.W. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children's drawings. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 485–497. doi:10.1080/095006999290534
  • Driver, R., Squires, A., Ruchworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science. Research into children's ideas. London: Routledge.
  • Duit, R., Gropengieβer, U.K., Komorek, M., & Parchmann, I. (2012). The model of educational reconstruction – a framework for improving teaching and learning science. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science education research and practice in Europe: Retrospective and prospective (pp. 13–38). Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Duit, R., Widodo, A., & Wodzinski, C. (2007). Conceptual change idea: Teachers’ views and their instructional practice. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Re-framing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 197–217). Amsterdam: Elsevier, in association with the European Association of Learning and Instruction.
  • Gerber, R. (2000). Children's thinking about graphics. In M. Robertson & R. Gerber (Eds.), The childs’ world: Triggers for learning (pp. 176–192). Melbourne: Acer Press.
  • Ghaye, A.L., & Robinson, E.G. (1989). Concept maps and children's thinking: A constructivist approach. In F. Slater (Ed.), Language and learning in the teaching of geography. London: Routledge.
  • Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
  • Gudmundsdottir, S., & Shulman, L. (1987). Pedagogical content knowledge in social studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 31(2), 59–70. doi:10.1080/0031383870310201
  • Halim, L., & Meerah, S.M. (2002). Science trainee teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 215–225. doi:10.1080/0263514022000030462
  • Haney, W., Russell, M., Gulek, C., & Fierros, E. (1998). Drawing on education: Using student drawings to promote middle school improvement. Schools in the Middle, 7(3), 38–43.
  • Hashweh, M. (1996a). The effects of science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 47–63. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199601)33:1<47::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-P
  • Hashweh, M. (1996b). Palestinian science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: A preliminary survey. Research in Science Education, 26(1), 89–102. doi:10.1007/BF02356965
  • Hollon, R., & Anderson, C. (1987, April). Teachers’ beliefs about students’ learning processes in science: Self-reinforcing belief systems. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
  • Kokkotas, P., Vlachos, I., & Koulaidis, V. (1998). Teaching the topic of the particulate nature of matter in prospective teachers’ training courses. International Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 291–303. doi:10.1080/0950069980200303
  • Kriewaldt, J. (2006). The key role of metacognition in an inquiry-based geography curriculum. Geographical Education, 19(2006), 24–30.
  • Lane, R. (2009). Articulating the pedagogical content knowledge of accomplished geography teachers. Geographical Education, 22, 40–49.
  • Lane, R. (2011). Exploring the content knowledge of experienced geography teachers. Geographical Education, 24, 51–63.
  • Lane, R., & Coutts, P. (2012). Students’ alternative conceptions of tropical cyclone causes and processes. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 21(3), 205–222. doi:10.1080/10382046.2012.698080
  • Larkin, D. (2012). Misconceptions about “misconceptions”: Preservice secondary science teachers’ views on the value and role of students’ ideas. Science Teacher Education, 96(5), 927–959. doi:10.1002/sce.21022
  • Leat, D. (1997). Cognitive acceleration in geographical education. In D. Tilbury & M. Williams (Eds.), Teaching and learning geography (pp. 143–153). London: Routledge.
  • Leat, D., & Lin, M. (2003). Developing a pedagogy of metacognition and transfer: Some signposts for the generation and use of knowledge and the creation of research partnerships. British Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 383–414. doi:10.1080/01411920301853
  • Lin, H., & Cheng, H. (2000). The assessment of students’ and teachers’ understanding of gas laws. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 235–238. doi:10.1021/ed077p235
  • Mackintosh, M., (1999). Children’s views in physical geography. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 8(1), 69–72. doi:10.1080/10382049908667592
  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • Marsh, C. (2008). Studies of society and environment (5th ed.). Sydney: Pearson Education.
  • Martin, F. (2008). Knowledge bases for effective teaching: Beginning teachers’ development as teachers of primary geography. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 17(1), 13–39. doi:10.2167/irgee226.0
  • Morrison, J., & Lederman, N. (2003). Science teachers’ diagnosis and understanding of students’ preconceptions. Science Education, 87(6), 849–867. doi:10.1002/sce.10092
  • Osborne, R.J., Bell, B.F., & Gilbert, J.K. (1983). Science teaching and children's views of the world. International Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 1–14.
  • Park, S., & Oliver, J.S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284.
  • Pinnegar, S. (1989). Teachers’ knowledge of students and classrooms. Doctor of Philosophy. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.
  • Reinfried, S. (2006a). Conceptual change in physical geography and environmental sciences through mental model building: The example of groundwater. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(1), 41–61.
  • Reinfried, S. (2006b). Educational reconstruction as a frame for development and research in the teaching and learning of Geography – a new approach in the Education of Secondary Teachers. Paper presented at the Changes in Geographical Education: Past, Present and Future. Proceedings of the International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education Symposium. Brisbane.
  • Reinfried, S. (2007). Educational reconstruction – a key to progress in geoscience teaching and learning. Geographie und ihre Didaktik, 4, 232–244.
  • Reinfried, S., Aeschbacher, U., & Rottermann, B. (2012). Improving students’ conceptual understanding of the greenhouse effect using theory-based learning materials that promote deep learning. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 21(2), 155–178. doi:10.1080/10382046.2012.672685
  • Reinfried, S., & Schuler, S. (2009). The Ludwigsburg-Lucerne bibliography of misconception research in the geosciences – a project to capture the international research literature. Geography and its Didactics, 37(3), 120–135.
  • Reitano, P. (2004). From preservice to inservice teaching: A study of conceptual change and knowledge in action. Griffith: Griffith University.
  • Roberts, M. (2003). Learning through enquiry: Making sense of geography in the key stage 3 classroom. Sheffield: Geographical Association.
  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
  • Shulman, L. (1999). Forward. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 61–77). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • Smith, D.C., & Neale, D.C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 1–20.
  • Smith, J.P., diSessa, A.A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
  • Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X., & Skopeliti, I. (2008). The framework theory approach to the problem of conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 3–34). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Watts, D.M., & Zylbersztajn, A. (1981). A survey of some children's ideas about force. Physics Education, 16(6), 360–365. doi:10.1088/0031-9120/16/6/313

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.