References
- Davila, K., & Talanquet, V. (2010). Classifying end-of-chapter questions and problems for selected general chemistry textbooks used in the United States. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(1), 97–102.
- DiGisi, L. L., & Willett, J. B. (1995). What high school biology teachers say about their textbook use: A descriptive study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(2), 123–142.
- Dunn, J. M. (2011). Location knowledge: Assessment, spatial thinking and new national geography standards. Journal of Geography, 110(2), 81–89.
- Edwards, D, and Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen/Routledge.
- Elisenman, H. B., & Wagner, D. (2007). A framework for uncovering the way a textbook may position the mathematics learner. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(2), 8–14.
- Jo, I., & Bednarz, B. S. (2009). Evaluating geography textbook questions from a spatial perspective: Using concepts of space, tools of representation, and cognitive processes to evaluate spatiality. Journal of Geography, 108(1), 4–13.
- Kahveci, A. (2010). Quantitative analysis of science and chemistry textbooks for indicators of reform: A complementary perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1495–1519.
- NCERT. (2005). National curriculum framework. New Delhi: NCERT.
- NCERT. (2007a). Contemporary India -1. New Delhi: NCERT.
- NCERT. (2007b). Contemporary India-2. New Delhi: NCERT.
- Ornstein, C. A. (1994). The textbook-driven curriculum. Peabody Journal of Education, 69(3), 70–85.
- Roberts, M. (1996). Teaching styles and strategies. In W.A. Kent, D. Lambert, M. Naish and F. Slater, (Eds.), Geography education: Viewpoints on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Rotman, B. (1988). Towards semiotics of mathematics. Semiotica, 7(2), 1–35.
- Shepardson, D. P., & Pizzini, E. L. (1991). Questioning levels of junior high school science textbooks and their implications for learning textual information. Science Education, 75, 673–682.