References
- Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (2001). Environmental psychology (5th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt College Publishers.
- Bosschaart, A., Kuiper, W., van der Schee, J., & Schoonenboom, J. (2013). The role of knowledge in students’ flood risk perception. Natural Hazards, 69(3), 1661–1680.
- Bostrom, A. (2008). Lead is like mercury: Risk comparisons, analogies and mental models. Journal of Risk Research, 11(1), 99–117.
- Bostrom, A., Fischhoff, B., & Morgan, M. G. (1992). Characterizing mental models of hazardous processes: A methodology and an application to radon. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 85–100.
- Collins, A., & Gentner, D. (1987). How people construct mental models. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Craik, K. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Deltacommittee (2008). Working together with water: A living land builds for its future. Findings of the Deltacommittee 2008. Rotterdam: Deltacommittee.
- Forbus, K., & Gentner, D. (1997). Qualitative mental models: Simulations or memories? In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, Cortona, Italy.
- Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2000). Mental models, conceptual models, and modelling. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1–11.
- Heems, G. C., & Kothuis, B. L. M. (2012). Waterveiligheid: Managen van kwetsbaarheid voorbij de mythe van droge voeten: De Nederlandse omgang met overstromingsdreiging in sociaal-cultureel perspectief. Amsterdam: Waterworks.
- Johnson-Laird, P. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Jones, N. A., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P., & Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: An interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 46. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/
- Kellens, W., Terpstra, T., & De Maeyer, P. (2012). Perception and communication of flood risks: A systematic review of empirical research. Risk Analysis, 33(1), 24–49.
- Lane, R., & Coutts, P. (2012). Students’ alternative conceptions of tropical cyclone causes and processes. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(3), 205–222.
- Lave, T. R., & Lave, L. B. (1991). Public perception of the risks of floods: Implications for communication. Risk Analysis, 11(2), 255–267.
- Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2004). Communicating environmental risk in multiethnic communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management. (2006). Kabinetsstandpunt Rampenbeheersing Overstromingen. The Hague: Author.
- Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., & Atman, C. (2002). Risk communication: A mental models approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Reinfried, S. (2006). Conceptual change in physical geography and environmental sciences through mental model building: The example of groundwater. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(1), 41–61.
- Reiner, M., Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Naive physics reasoning: A commitment to substance-based conceptions. Cognition and Instruction, 18(1), 1–34.
- Reinfried, S., Aeschbacher, U., & Rottermann, B. (2012). Improving students’ conceptual understanding of the greenhouse effect using theory-based learning materials that promote deep learning. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(2), 155–178.
- Rapp, D. (2005). Mental models: Theoretical issues for visualizations in science education. In J.K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 43–60). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Talanquer, V. (2006). Commonsense chemistry: A model for understanding students’ alternative conceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(5), 811–816.
- Terpstra, T. (2009). Flood preparedness: Thoughts, feelings and intentions of the Dutch public (Thesis). University of Twente, Enschede.
- Terpstra, T. (2011). Emotions, trust and perceived risk. Affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior. Risk Analysis, 31(10), 1658–1675.
- Terpstra, T., & Gutteling, J. M. (2008). Households’ perceived responsibilities in flood risk management in the Netherlands. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(4), 555–565.
- Tobin, G. A. (1995). The levee love affair: A stormy relationship. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 31(3), 359–367.
- Tversky, B. (2003). Structures of mental spaces: how people think about space. Environment and Behavior. doi:10.1177/0013916502238865
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
- Visschers, H. M., Meertens, R. M., Passchier, W. F., & de Vries, N. K. (2007). How does the general public evaluate risk information? The impact of associations with other risks. Risk Analysis, 27(3), 715–727.
- Wachinger, G., & Renn, O. (2010). Risk perception and natural hazards. CapHaz-Net WP3 report. Available from: http://caphaz-net.org/outcomes-results/CapHaz-Net_WP3_Risk-Perception.pdf
- Wagner K. (2007). Mental models of flash floods and landslides. Risk Analysis, 27(3), 671–682.
- Wood, M.D., Bostrom, A., Bridges, T., & Linkov, I. (2012a). Cognitive mapping tools: Review and risk management needs. Risk Analysis, 32(8), 1333–1348. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01767.x
- Wood, M. D., Bostrom, A., Convertino, M., Kovacs, D., & Linkov, I. (2012b). A moment of mental model clarity: Response to Jones et al. 2011. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 7.
- Zaksek, M., & Arvai, J. L. (2004). Toward improved communication about wildland fire: Mental models research to identify information needs for natural resource management. Risk Analysis, 24(6), 1503–1514.