326
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Causes, processes and consequences of “desertification”: Results of a qualitative study about the conceptions of 12- and 13-year-old students in Germany

Pages 148-166 | Received 24 Oct 2013, Accepted 22 May 2014, Published online: 02 Jan 2015

References

  • Adamina, M. (2008). Vorstellungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern zu raum-, zeit- und geschichtsbezogenen Themen: Eine explorative Studie in Klassen des 1., 3., 5. und 7. Schuljahres im Kanton Bern [Students’ conceptions on space, time and history-related topics: An exploratory study with students from grade 1, 3, 5 and 7 in the canton of Bern]. Muenster: University of Muenster.
  • Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 807–830). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Baumhauer, R. (2011). Desertifikation: Risikoraum Afrika [Desertification: Risk space Africa]. In R. Glaser, K. Kremb, & A. W. Drescher (Eds.), Afrika (pp. 47–55). Darmstadt: WBG.
  • Berkheimer, G. D., Anderson, C. W., & Smith, E. L. (1992). Unit planning for conceptual change: Science education in Michigan Schools Project. Marquette: Glenn T. Seaborg Center for Teaching and Learning Science and Mathematics at Northern Michigan University.
  • Bette, J. (2011). Schülervorstellungen und fachliche Vorstellungen zur Geographie und ihren zentralen Konzepten. Eine empirische und hermeneutische Untersuchung [Students’ conceptions and scientific explanations on geography and its key concepts. An empirical and hermeneutic study]. Muenster: Institute for Geography Education.
  • Bork, H., & Eitel, B. (2008). Bodenerosion und Desertifikation. [Soil erosion and desertification] In C. Felgentreff & T. Glade (Eds.), Naturrisiken und Sozialkatastrophen (pp. 191–200). Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Bos, W., & Tarnai, C. (1999). Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 659–671.
  • Boyes, E., Skamp, K., & Stanisstreet, M. (2009). Australian secondary students’ views about global warming: Beliefs about actions, and willingness to act. Research in Science Education, 39(5), 661–680.
  • Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1993). The “greenhouse effect”: Children's perceptions of causes, consequences and cures. International Journal of Science Education, 15(5), 531–552.
  • Burton, D. N., Robert, H. A., & Francek, M. A. (1992). Clarification of selected misconceptions in physical geography. Journal of Geography, 91(2), 76–80.
  • Confrey, J. (1990). A review of the research on student conceptions in mathematics, science, and programming. Review of Research in Education, 16, 3–56.
  • Dickerson, D., & Dawkins, K. (2004). Eighth grade students’ understandings of groundwater. Journal of Geoscience Education, 52(2), 178–181.
  • diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Froman & P. B. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • diSessa, A. A. (2008). A bird's-eye view of the “pieces” vs. “coherence” controversy (from the “pieces” side of the fence). In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 35–60). New York: Routledge.
  • Dittmann, S. (2009). Bodenversalzung. Fachliche Vorstellungen und Schülervorstellungen zu einem geographischen Themenklassiker [Soil salinization. Scientific explanations and students’ conceptions of classic topic within geography]. Oldenburg: Diz.
  • Dove, J. (1998). Students’ alternative conceptions in Earth science: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Research Papers in Education, 13(2), 183–201.
  • Dove, J. (1999). Theory into practice: Immaculate misconceptions. Sheffield: Geographical Association.
  • Dove, J. (2012). Tropical rainforests: A case study of UK, 13-year-olds’ knowledge and understanding of these environments. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(1), 59–70.
  • Duit, R. (1992). Forschungen zur Bedeutung vorunterrichtlicher Vorstellungen für das Erlernen der Naturwissenschaften [Research on the importance of pre-instructional conceptions in science learning]. In K. Riquarts, W. Dierks, R. Duit, G. Eulenfeld, H. Haft, & H. Stork (Eds.), Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Band IV. (pp. 47–84). Kiel: IPN.
  • Duit, R. (1995). Zur Rolle der konstruktivistischen Sichtweise in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen Lehr und Lernforschung [On the role of a constructivist view in teaching and learning research in the field of natural science didactics]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 41(6), 905–923.
  • Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography – STCSE. Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Retrieved from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html
  • Friebertshäuser, B., & Langer, A. (2010). Interview for men und interview praxis [Interview types and interview practice]. In B. Friebertshäuser, A. Langer, & A. Prengel (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft (pp. 437–455). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
  • German Geographical Society. (Eds.). (2012). Educational standards in geography for the intermediate school certificate – with sample assignments. Bonn: German Geographical Society.
  • Gerstenmaier, J., & Mandl, H. (1995). Wissenserwerb unter konstruktivistischer Perspektive [Knowledge acquisition from constructivist perspective]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 41(6), 867–888.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2010). Grounded theory. Strategien qualitativer Forschung [The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research]. Bern: Huber.
  • Gropengießer, H. (2007). Didaktische Rekonstruktion des Sehens. Wissenschaftliche Theorien und die Sicht der Schüler in der Perspektive der Vermittlung [Didactical reconstruction of vision: Scientific theories and students’ perspectives in the view of a knowledge transfer]. Oldenburg: BIS.
  • Häußler, P., Bünder, W., Duit, R., Gräber, W., & Mayer, J. (1998). Naturwissenschaftsdidaktische Forschung – Perspektiven für die Unterrichtspraxis [Research in natural sciences didactics – perspectives for teaching practice]. Kiel: IPN.
  • Heffron, S., & Downs, R. M. (Eds.). (2012). Geography for life: National geography standards. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society.
  • Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hopf, C. (2004). Qualitative interviews – an overview. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 203–208). London: Sage.
  • Hussy, W., Schreier, M., & Echterhoff, G. (2010). Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften [Research methods in psychology and social sciences] Berlin: Springer.
  • Imeson, A. (Ed.). (2012). Desertification, land degradation and sustainability. Paradigms, processes, principles and policies. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Janßen-Bartels, A., & Sander, E. (2004). Verallgemeinerung qualitativer Daten in der biologiedidaktischen Lehr-Lernforschung [Generalization of qualitative data in the research of learning and teaching biology]. In H. Gropengießer, A. Janßen-Bartels, & E. Sander (Eds.), Lehren fürs Leben. Didaktische Rekonstruktion in der Biologie (pp. 109–118). Köln: Aulis.
  • Kelle, U., & Erzberger, C. (2004). Qualitative and quantitative methods: Not in opposition. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 172–177). London: Sage.
  • Kelle, U., & Kluge, S. (2010). Vom Einzelfall zum Typus. Fallvergleich und Fallkontrastierung in der qualitativen Sozialforschung [From individual case to type. Case comparison and case contrast in qualitative social research]. Wiesbaden: Springer.
  • Krüger, D. (2007). Die conceptual change-theorie [The theory of conceptual change]. In D. Krüger & H. Vogt (Eds.), Theorien in der biologiedidaktischen Forschung. Ein Handbuch für Lehramtsstudenten und Doktoranden (pp. 81–92). Berlin: Springer.
  • Lamnek, S. (2010). Qualitative Sozialforschung [Qualitative social research]. Weinheim: Beltz.
  • Lane, R., & Coutts, P. (2012). Students’ alternative conceptions of tropical cyclone causes and processes. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(3), 205–222.
  • Leser, H. (Ed.). (2011). Diercke Wörterbuch Geographie. Raum – Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft – Umwelt [Diercke dictionary on geography. Space – economy and society – environment]. Braunschweig: Westermann.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2386
  • Mayring, P. (2002). Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken [Introduction to qualitative social research: A manual to qualitative thinking]. Weinheim: Westermann.
  • Meadows, G., & Wiesenmayer, R. L. (1999). Identifying and addressing students’ alternative conceptions of the causes of global warming: The need for cognitive conflict. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(3), 235–239.
  • Möller, K. (1999). Konstruktivistisch orientierte Lehr-Lernprozessforschung im naturwissenschaftlich-technischen Bereich des Sachunterrichts. [Constructivist research on learning and teaching processes in the field of natural science and technology within primary science] In W. Köhnlein (Ed.), Vielperspektivisches Denken im Sachunterricht (pp. 125–191). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
  • Möller, K. (2010). Lernen von Naturwissenschaft heisst: Konzepte verändern [Learning from natural sciences means: change of concepts]. In P. Labudde (Ed.), Fachdidaktik Naturwissenschaft. 1.-9. Schuljahr (pp. 57–72). Haupt: Bern.
  • Murphy, K. P., & Alexander, P. A. (2008). The role of knowledge, beliefs, and interest in the conceptual change process: A synthesis and meta-analysis of the research. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 583–616). New York: Routledge.
  • National Research Council. (Ed.) (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Niedderer, H., & Schecker, H. (1992). Towards an explicit description of cognitive systems for research in physics learning. In R. Duit, F. M. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies; proceedings of an international workshop (pp. 74–98). Kiel: IPN.
  • Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937–949.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189–1208.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pui-ming Yeung, S., Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (2004). Air pollution: The knowledge and attitudes of secondary school students in Hong Kong. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 13(1), 21–37.
  • Reinfried, S. (2006a). Alltagsvorstellungen – und wie man sie verändern kann. Das Beispiel Grundwasser [Alternative conceptions – and how you can change them. Exemplified on groundwater]. Geographie heute, 27(243), 38–42.
  • Reinfried, S. (2006b). Conceptual change in physical geography and environmental sciences through mental model building: The example of groundwater. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(1), 41–61.
  • Reinfried, S. (2008). Schülervorstellungen und Lernen von Geographie [Students’ conceptions and learning geography]. Geographie heute, 29(265), 8–13.
  • Reinfried, S., Aeschbacher, U., & Rottermann, B. (2012). Improving students’ conceptual understanding of the greenhouse effect using theory-based learning materials that promote deep learning. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(2), 155–178.
  • Reinfried, S., & Schuler, S. (2009). Die Ludwigsburg-Luzerner Bibliographie zur Alltagsvorstellungsforschung in den Geowissenschaften – ein Projekt zur Erfassung der internationalen Forschungsliteratur [The Ludwigsburg-Lucerne bibliography on conceptual change research in the geosciences – a project to establish a comprehensive collection of international research papers in the field]. Geographie und ihre Didaktik /Journal of Geography Education, 37(3), 120–135.
  • Reinmann, G., & Mandl, H. (2006). Unterrichten und Lernumgebung gestalten [Teaching and creating learning environments]. In A. Krapp & B. Weidenmann (Eds.), Pädagogische Psychologie. Ein Lehrbuch (pp. 613–658). Weinheim: Beltz.
  • Riemeier, T. (2007). Moderater Konstruktivismus. [Moderate constructivism] In D. Krüger & H. Vogt (Eds.), Theorien in der biologiedidaktischen Forschung – Ein Handbuch für Lehramtsstudenten und Doktoranden (pp. 69–79). Berlin: Springer.
  • Schnotz, W. (2006). Conceptual change [Conceptual change]. In D. H. Rost (Ed.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 77–82). Weinheim: Beltz.
  • Schramke, W. (1999). Concept mapping: Schüler strukturieren ihr Wissen [Concept mapping: Students structure their knowledge]. Praxis Geographie, 29(7–8), 18–23.
  • Schubert, J. C. (2012). Schülervorstellungen zu Wüsten und Desertifikation – Eine empirische Untersuchung zu einem zentralen Thema des Geographieunterrichts [Students’ conceptions on the topic of deserts and desertification – An empirical research project on a crucial topic of geography classroom]. Muenster: University of Muenster.
  • Schuler, S. (2011). Alltagstheorien zu den Ursachen und Folgen des globalen Klimawandels. Erhebung und Analyse von Schülervorstellungen aus geographiedidaktischer Perspektive [Alternative theories on the causes and consequences of climate change. Collection and analysis of students’ conceptions from the perspective of the didactics of geography]. Bochum: Europäischer Universitätsverlag.
  • Steinke, I. (2004). Quality criteria in qualitative research. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 184–190). London: Sage.
  • United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. (Eds.). (1994). United Nations convention to combat desertification in those countries experiencing serious drought and/or desertification, particularly in Africa. Bonn: UNCCD.
  • United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. (Eds.). (2008). Desertification – coping with today's global challenges in the context of the strategy of the United Nations convention to combat desertification. Eschborn: GTZ.
  • United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. (Eds.). (2011). Land and soil in the context of a green economy for sustainable development, food security and poverty eradication. Bonn: UNCCD.
  • von Aufschnaiter, S. (2001). Wissensentwicklung und Lernen am Beispiel Physikunterricht [Knowledge development and learning using the example of physics lessons]. In J. Meixner & K. Müller (Eds.), Konstruktivistische Schulpraxis: Beispiele für den Unterricht (pp. 249–271). Neuwied: Beltz.
  • Vosniadou, S. (2002). On the nature of naive physics. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 61–76). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the Earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535–585.
  • Witzel, A. (2000). The problem-centered interview. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1132/2522

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.