692
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Reconsidering legal capacity: radical critiques, governmentality and dividing practice

References

Primary sources

  • Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities General Comment No 1 (2014) Article 12: Equal Recognition Before the Law, CRPD/C/GC/1, 11 April 2014.
  • Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, adopted 13 December 2006, GA Res 61/106, UN Doc A/Res/61/106, entered into force 3 May 2008.
  • United Nations Human Rights Council (2009) Thematic Study By the United Nations Commission for Human Rights On Enhancing Awareness and Understanding of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 26 January 2009, A/HRC/10/48.

Secondary sources

  • Tanja Aalberts and Ben Golder (2012) ‘On the Uses of Foucault for International Law’ 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 603.
  • AHRC (Australian Human Rights Commission) (2014) Equal Before the Law: Towards Disability Justice Strategies, Australian Government.
  • ALRC (Australian Law Reform Commission) (2013) Equality Capacities and Disability in Commonwealth Laws, issues paper 44, Australian Government.
  • Samuel Bagenstos (2004) ‘The Future of Disability Law’114 Yale Law Journal 1.
  • Andrew Barry and Thomas Osborne (1993) ‘Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Governmentality: Introduction’ 22 Economy and Society 266.
  • Lee Anne Basser (2011) ‘Human Dignity’ in M Rioux et al (eds) Critical Perspectives on Human Rights and Disability Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Wendy Brown (1995) States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity, Princeton University Press.
  • Wendy Brown (2002) ‘Suffering the Paradoxes of Rights’ in W Brown and J Halley (eds) Left Legalism/Left Critique, Duke University Press.
  • Wendy Brown and Janet Halley (eds) (2002) Left Legalism/Left Critique, Duke University Press.
  • Judith Butler (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, Routledge.
  • Fiona Kumari Campbell (2005) ‘On the Government of Disability: Foucault Power and the Subject of Impairment’ in L Davis (ed) The Disability Studies Reader, Routledge.
  • Jane Campbell and Mike Oliver (2013) Disability Politics: Understanding Our Past, Changing Our Future, Routledge.
  • Terry Carney (1989) ‘The Limits and Social Legacy of Guardianship in Australia’ 18 Federal Law Review 321.
  • Terry Carney (2013a) ‘Participation and Service Access Rights for People With Intellectual Disability: A Role For Law? 38 Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 59.
  • Terry Carney (2013b) ‘Public and Private Bricolage-Challenges Balancing Law, Services and Civil Society in Advancing CRPD Supported Decision-Making’ 36 University of New South Wales Law Journal 175.
  • Robert Castel (1994) ‘Problematization As a Mode of Reading History’ in J Goldstein (ed) Foucault and the Writing of History, Blackwell.
  • Chris Cunneen et al (2013) Penal Culture and Hyperincarceration: The Revival of the Prison, Ashgate.
  • Lennard Davis (ed) (2013) The Disability Studies Reader, Routledge.
  • Amita Dhanda (2005) ‘The Right to Treatment of Persons With Psychosocial Disabilities and the Role of the Courts’ 28 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 155.
  • Amita Dhanda (2007) ‘Legal Capacity in the Disability Rights Convention: Stranglehold of the Past or Lodestar for the Future?’ 34 Syracuse Journal of International Law & Commerce 429.
  • Peter Fitzpatrick (2012) ‘Foucault’s Other Law’ in B Golder (ed) Re-Reading Foucault: On Law, Power and Rights, Routledge.
  • Michel Foucault (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Allen Lane.
  • Michel Foucault (1979) The History of Sexuality-Volume 1, Penguin.
  • Michel Foucault (1980) ‘Two Lectures’ in C Gordon (ed) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, Harvester Press.
  • Michel Foucault (1983) ‘The Subject and Power’ in HL Dreyfus and P Rabinow (eds) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, University of Chicago Press.
  • Michel Foucault (1990 [1978]) The History of Sexuality: Volume 1, Penguin.
  • Michel Foucault (1991a) ‘Questions of Method’ in G Burchell et al (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, University of Chicago Press.
  • Michel Foucault (1991b) ‘Governmentality’ in G Burchell et al (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, University of Chicago Press.
  • Michel Foucault (2000) ‘The Subject and Power’ in J.D. Faubion (ed) Power: Essential Works of Michel Foucault Vol. III, The New Press.
  • Michel Foucault (2003) ‘Society Must Be Defended’ in D Mace (trans) Lectures at the College de France 1975–76 240.
  • Ian Freckelton (2013) ‘Brain Injuries and Coercive Care: Human Rights Issues and Challenges’ in B McSherry and I Freckleton (eds) Coercive Care: Rights, Law and Policy, Routledge.
  • Ben Golder and Peter Fitzpatrick (2009) Foucault’s Law, Routledge-Cavendish.
  • Piers Gooding (2013) ‘Supported Decision-Making: A Rights-Based Disability Concept and Its Implication for Mental Health Law’ 20 Psychiatry, Psychology and the Law 431.
  • Ian Hacking (1986) ‘Making Up People’ in TC Heller et al (eds) Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality and the Self in Western Thought, Stanford University Press.
  • Alan Hunt and Gary Wickham (1994) Foucault and Law- Towards a Sociology of Law as Governance, Pluto Press.
  • Martin Jackson et al (2011) Acquired Brain Injury in the Victorian Prison System, Department of Justice.
  • Melinda Jones (2011) ‘Inclusion, Social Inclusion and Participation’ in MH Rioux, LA Basser and M Jones (eds) Critical Perspectives on Human Rights and Disability Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Rosemary Kayess and Phil French (2008) ‘Out of Darkness Into Light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ 8 Rights Law Review 1.
  • John Stuart Mills (1999 [1869]) ‘On Liberty’ http://www.bartleby.com.
  • Martha Nussbaum (2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Harvard University.
  • David Oaks (2011) ‘The Moral Imperative For Dialogue With Organizations of Survivors of Coerced Psychiatric Human Rights Violations’ in T Kallert et al (eds) Coercive Treatment in Psychiatry: Clinical, Legal and Ethical Aspects, Wily-Blackwell.
  • Anne Orford (2012) ‘In Praise of Description’ 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 609.
  • Michael Perlin (1992) ‘On Sanism’ 46 SMUL Review 373.
  • Michael Perlin (1999) ‘“Half-Wracked Prejudice Leaped Forth”: Sanism, Pretextuality, and Why and How Mental Disability Law Developed As It Did’ 10 Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 3.
  • Michael Perlin (2000) The Hidden Prejudice: Mental Disability on Trial, American Psychological Association Press.
  • Michael Perlin (2006) ‘International Human Rights and Comparative Mental Disability Law: The Role of Institutional Psychiatry in the Suppression of Political Dissent’ 39 Israel Law Review 3.
  • Michael Perlin (2011) International Human Rights and Medical Disability Law: When the Silenced Are Heard, Oxford University Press.
  • Alan Petersen (2012) ‘Foucault, health and healthcare’ in Graham Scrambler (ed) Contemporary Theorists for Medical Sociology, Routlege.
  • Andrew Power et al (2013) Active Citizenship and Disability Implementing the Personalisation of Support, Cambridge University Press.
  • Paul Rabinow (1984) The Foucault Reader: An Introduction to Foucaults Thought, Penguin.
  • Marcia Rioux and Lora Patton (2011) ‘Beyond Legal Smokescreens: Applying a Human Rights Analysis to the Sterilisation Jurisprudence’ in LA Basser and M Jones (eds) Critical Perspectives on Human Rights and Disability Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Nicholas Rose (1985) The Psychological Complex: Psychology, Politics, and Society in England, 1869–1939, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Nicholas Rose (1990) Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self, Routledge.
  • Nicholas Rose (1994) ‘Medicine, History and the Present’ in C Jones and R Porter (eds) Reassessing Foucault: Power, Medicine and the Body, Routledge.
  • Fiona Sampson (2011) ‘Beyond Compassion to Respect and Equality: Gendered Disability and Equality Rights Law’ in D Pothier and R Devlin (eds) Critical Disability Theory: Essays in Philosophy, Disability, Policy and Law, University of British Columbia Press.
  • Tom Shakespeare (2013) ‘The Social Model of Disability’ in L Davis (ed) The Disability Studies Reader, Routledge.
  • Margrit Shildrick (2005) ‘Transgressing the Law With Foucault and Derrida: Some Reflections on Embodiment’ 47(3) Critical Quarterly 30.
  • Margrit Shildrick and Janet Price (1996) ‘Breaking the Boundaries of the Broken Body: Mastery, Materiality and Me’ 2(4) Body and Society 93.
  • Christopher Slobogin (2006) Minding Justice: Laws That Deprive People With Mental Disability of Life and Liberty, Harvard University Press.
  • Henri-Jacques Stiker (1999) A History Of Disability, University of Michigan Press.
  • Margaret Thornton (1995) Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates, Oxford University Press.
  • Shelley Tremain (2005) ‘Foucault, Governmentality, and Critical Disability Theory: An Introduction’ in S Tremain (ed) Foucault and the Government of Disability, University of Michigan Press.
  • Marianna Valverde (1998) Diseases of the Will: Alcohol and the Dilemmas of Freedom, Cambridge University Press.
  • VLRC (Victorian Law Reform Commission) (2012) Guardianship, State of Victoria.
  • Loic Wacquant (2009) Prisons of Poverty, University of Minnesota Press.
  • Penelope Weller (2008) ‘Supported Decision-Making and the Achievement of Non-Discrimination: The Promise and Paradox of the Disabilities Convention’ in B McSherry (ed) International Trends in Mental Health Laws. Law in Context Special Issue, The Federation Press.
  • Penelope Weller (2010) ‘Lost in Translation: Human Rights and Mental Health Law’ in B McSherry and P Weller (eds) Rethinking Rights-Based Mental Health Laws, Hart Publishing.
  • Penelope Weller (2013a) New Law and Ethics in Mental Health Advance Directives: The Convention on the Rights of Person with Disabilities and the Right to Choose, Routledge.
  • Penelope Weller (2013b) ‘Towards a Genealogy of Coercive Care’ in I Freckelton and B McSherry (eds) Coercive Care, Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.