Deceptive apparatus: Foucauldian perspectives on law, authorised crime and the rationalities of undercover investigation

References

• Daniel Abelson (2003) ‘Sentencing Entrapment: An Overview and Analysis’ 86 Marquette Law Review 773.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgio Agamben (2009) What Is an Apparatus? Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgio Agamben (2011) The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government, Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peter Andreas and Ethan Nadelmann (2006) Policing the Globe: Criminalization and Crime Control in International Relations, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew Ashworth (1998) ‘Should the Police Be Allowed to Use Deceptive Practices?’ 114 Law Quarterly Review 108.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew Ashworth (1999) ‘What Is Wrong with Entrapment?’ Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 293.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew Ashworth (2000) ‘Testing Fidelity to Legal Values: Official Involvement and Criminal Justice’ 63 The Modern Law Review 633. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00285
   Google Scholar
• Andrew Ashworth (2002) ‘Re-drawing the Boundaries of Entrapment’ March Criminal Law Review 161.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) (2005) Practice Advice on Core Investigative Doctrine, ACPO.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) (1975) Report No. 2: An Interim Report: Criminal Investigation, Australian Law Reform Commission.
   Google Scholar
• John Baker (2002) An Introduction to English Legal History, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Behrent (2013) ‘Foucault and Technology’ 29 History and Technology: An International Journal 54. doi: 10.1080/07341512.2013.780351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Bowling and James Sheptycki (2012) Global Policing, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• John Braithwaite et al (1987) ‘Covert Facilitation and Crime: Restoring Balance to the Entrapment Debate’ 43 Journal of Social Issues 5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1987.tb02344.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jean-Paul Brodeur (2010) Police Investigation, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon Bronitt (1999) ‘Entrapment, Human Rights and Criminal Justice: A Licence to Deviate?’ 29 Hong Kong Law Journal 216.
   Google Scholar
• Simon Bronitt (2002) ‘Sang Is Dead, Loosely Speaking’ Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 374.
   Google Scholar
• Simon Bronitt (2004) ‘The Law in Undercover Policing: A Comparative Study of Entrapment and Covert Interviewing in Australia, Canada and Europe’ 33 Common Law World Review 35. doi: 10.1350/clwr.33.1.35.25831
   Google Scholar
• Simon Bronitt and Declan Roche (2000) ‘Between Rhetoric and Reality: Sociolegal and Republican Perspectives on Entrapment’ 4 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 77.
   Google Scholar
• Simon Bronitt and Declan Roche (2001) ‘Entrapment, the Art of Police Deception’ 73 AQ: Australian Quarterly 20.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Brown (2001) Criminal Investigation: Law and Practice, Butterworths-Heineman.
   Google Scholar
• Robin Bryant (2009) ‘Theories of Criminal Investigation’ in Stephen Tong, Robin Bryant and Miranda Horvath (eds) Understanding Criminal Investigation, Wiley 13.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey Bussolini (2010) ‘What Is a Dispositif?’ 10 Foucault Studies 85.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel Candelaria and George Steffen (2003) Drug Interdiction: Partnerships, Legal Principles, and Investigative Methodologies for Law Enforcement, CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adam Chernok (2011) ‘Entrapment under Controlled Operations Legislation: A Victorian Perspective’ 35 Criminal Law Journal 361.
   Google Scholar
• Eric Colvin (2002) ‘Controlled Operations, Controlled Activities and Entrapment’ 14 Bond Law Review 227.
   Google Scholar
• PD Cutting (1983) ‘The Technique of Controlled Delivery as a Weapon in Dealing with Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances’ 34 UNODC Bulletin on Narcotics 15.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell Dean (2010) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, 2nd edn, Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell Dean (2012) ‘The Signature of Power’ 5 Journal of Political Power 101. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2012.659864
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell Dean (2013) The Signature of Power, Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gilles Deleuze (1991) ‘What Is a Dispositif?’ in TJ Armstrong (ed) Michel Foucault: Philosopher, Harvester Wheatsheaf 159.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie Downer (ed) (1972) Leges Henrici Primi, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hubert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow (1982) Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus Dubber (2005) The Police Power: Patriarchy and the Foundations of American Government, Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit Dupont (2003) ‘The New Face of Police Governance in Australia’ 27 Journal of Australian Studies 15. doi: 10.1080/14443050309387867
   Google Scholar
• Gerald Dworkin (1985) ‘The Serpent Beguiled Me and I Did Eat: Entrapment and the Creation of Crime’ 4 Law and Philosophy 17. doi: 10.1007/BF00208259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clive Emsley and Haia Shpayer-Makov (eds) (2006) Police Detectives in History, 1750–1950, Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Richard Ericson (2007) Crime in an Insecure World, Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richard Ericson and Kevin Haggerty (1997) Policing the Risk Society, University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cyrille Fijnaut and Gary T Marx (1995) Undercover: Police Surveillance in Comparative Perspective, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis Fitzgerald (2007) Informants and Undercover Investigations: A Practical Guide to Law, Policy and Procedure, CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michel Foucault (1980) ‘The Confession of the Flesh’ in Colin Gordon (ed) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, 194.
   Google Scholar
• Michel Foucault (1989) The Birth of the Clinic, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michel Foucault (1994) ‘Truth and Juridical Forms’ in James Faubion (ed) Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Editions Gallimard edn, Penguin 1.
   Google Scholar
• Michel Foucault (1998) The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge, Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Michel Foucault (2003) The Archaeology of Knowledge, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michel Foucault (2005) The Order of Things, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michel Foucault (2006) History of Madness, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michel Foucault (2007) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France 1977–1978, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ben Golder and Peter Fitzpatrick (2009) Foucault’s Law, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Peter Grabosky (2001) ‘Crime Control in the 21st Century’ 34 Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 221. doi: 10.1177/000486580103400302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gary Gutting (1989) Michel Foucault’s Archaeology of Scientific Reason, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nick Hardy (2013) ‘A History of the Method: Examining Foucault’s Research Methodology’ in Robert Porter, Iain Mackenzie and Benoît Dillet (eds) The Edinburgh Companion to Poststructuralism, Edinburgh University Press 95.
   Google Scholar
• Clive Harfield (2010) ‘The Governance of Covert Investigation’ 34 Melbourne University Law Review 773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clive Harfield and Karen Harfield (2008a) Covert Investigation, 2nd edn Blackstone’s Practical Policing, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clive Harfield and Karen Harfield (2008b) Intelligence: Investigation, Community and Partnership, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• John Dyson Heydon (1973) ‘The Problems of Entrapment’ 32 Cambridge Law Journal 268. doi: 10.1017/S0008197300090759
   Google Scholar
• Hock Lai Ho (2011) ‘State Entrapment’ 31 Legal Studies 71. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00176.x
   Google Scholar
• John Horswell (ed) (2004) The Practice of Crime Scene Investigation, CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons (1833) Report from the Select Committee on the Petition of Frederick Young and Others, House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons (1853) The Speeches of the Late Right Honourable Sir Robert Peel Delivered in the House of Commons, George Routledge & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Immanuel Kant (1996) Critique of Pure Reason, Hackett Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Karl Kent and Bruce Nelson (2004) ‘Drug Operations’ in John Horswell (ed) The Practice of Crime Scene Investigation, CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• John Kleinig (1996) The Ethics of Policing, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jack Kuykendall (1982) ‘The Criminal Investigative Process: Toward a Conceptual Framework’ 10 Journal of Criminal Justice 131. doi: 10.1016/0047-2352(82)90004-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law Commission (UK) (1977) Criminal Law – Report on Defences of General Application, Law Commission 83.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Lyman (2006) Practical Drug Enforcement, 3rd edn, CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mary Beth Mader (2014) ‘Knowledge’ in Leonard Lawlor and John Nale (eds) The Cambridge Foucault Lexicon, Cambridge University Press 226.
   Google Scholar
• Mike Maguire (2008) ‘Criminal Investigation and Crime Control’ in Tim Newburn (ed) Handbook of Policing, Willan Publishers 430.
   Google Scholar
• Mike Maguire and Timothy John (1996) ‘Covert and Deceptive Policing in England and Wales: Issues in Regulation and Practice’ 4 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 316. doi: 10.1163/157181796X00177
   Google Scholar
• Gary T Marx (1974) ‘Thoughts on a Neglected Category of Social Movement Participant: The Agent Provocateur and the Informant’ 80 American Journal of Sociology 402. doi: 10.1086/225807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gary T Marx (1980) ‘The New Police Undercover Work’ 8 Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 399. doi: 10.1177/089124168000800402
   Google Scholar
• Gary T Marx (1981) ‘Ironies of Social Control: Authorities as Contributors to Deviance Through Escalation, Nonenforcement and Covert Facilitation’ 28 Social Problems 221. doi: 10.2307/800300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gary T Marx (1982) ‘Who Really Gets Stung? Some Issues Raised by the New Police Undercover Work’ 28 Crime & Delinquency 165. doi: 10.1177/001112878202800201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gary T Marx (1985) ‘I’ll Be Watching You: Reflections on the New Surveillance’ in Clive Norris and Dean Wilson (eds) Surveillance, Crime and Social Control, Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gary T Marx (1987) ‘Restoring Realism and Logic to the Covert Facilitation Debate’ 43 Journal of Social Issues 43. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1987.tb02345.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gary T Marx (1988) Undercover: Police Surveillance in America, University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gary T Marx (1992a) ‘Under-the-Covers Undercover Operations: Some Reflections on the State’s Use of Sex and Deception in Law Enforcement’ 11 Criminal Justice Ethics 13. doi: 10.1080/0731129X.1992.9991907
   Google Scholar
• Gary T Marx (1992b) ‘When the Guards Guard Themselves: Undercover Tactics Turned Inward’ 2 Policing and Society 151. doi: 10.1080/10439463.1992.9964639
   Google Scholar
• Simon McKay (2011) Covert Policing: Law and Practice, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jess Mekeel (2006) ‘Misnamed, Misapplied, and Misguided: Clarifying the State of Sentencing Entrapment and Proposing a New Conception of the Doctrine’ 14 William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 1583.
   Google Scholar
• Kerry Milte (1977) Police in Australia, Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Mark Moore (1977) Buy and Bust: The Effective Regulation of an Illicit Heroin Market, Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Timothy Moore et al (2009) ‘Deceit, Betrayal and the Search for Truth: Legal and Psychological Perspectives on the “Mr Big” Strategy’ 55 Criminal Law Quarterly 348.
   Google Scholar
• Bob Morris (2007) ‘History of Criminal Investigation’ in Tim Newburn, Tom Williamson and Alan Wright (eds) Handbook of Criminal Investigation, Willan Publishing 15.
   Google Scholar
• Brendon Murphy (2014) ‘Retrospective on Ridgeway: Governing Principles of Controlled Operations Law’ 38 Criminal Law Journal 38.
   Google Scholar
• Brendon Murphy (2015) Zone of Impeachment: A Post-Foucauldian Analysis of Controlled Operations Law and Policy, Newcastle Law School University of Newcastle.
   Google Scholar
• Brendon Murphy and John Anderson (2014) ‘After the Serpent Beguiled Me: Entrapment and Sentencing in Australian and Canada’ 39 Queen's Law Journal 621.
   Google Scholar
• Brendon Murphy and John Anderson (2016) ‘Confessions to Mr Big: A New Rule of Evidence?’ 20 International Journal of Evidence and Proof. doi: 10.1177/1365712715613485
   Google Scholar
• Ethan Nadelmann (1990) ‘Global Prohibitions Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society’ 44 International Organisation 479. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300035384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethan Nadelmann (1994) Cops Across Borders: The Internationalization of U.S. Criminal Law Enforcement, Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alan Norrie (2005) Law and the Beautiful Soul, GlassHouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce O’Brien (1999) God’s Peace & King’s Peace: The Laws of Edward Confessor, University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lisi Oliver (2002) The Beginnings of English Law, University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• David Ormerod and Andrew Roberts (2002) ‘The Trouble with Teixeira: Developing a Principled Approach to Entrapment’ 6 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 3.
   Google Scholar
• Matteo Pasquinelli (2015) ‘What an Apparatus Is Not: On the Archeology of the Norm in Foucault, Canguilhem, and Goldstein’ 22 Parrhesia 79.
   Google Scholar
• C Philips (1980) The Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure. Report. The Investigation and Prosecution of Criminal Offences in England and Wales: The Law and Procedure.
   Google Scholar
• Leon Radzinowicz (1956) A History of English Criminal Law and Its Administration from 1750: Volume 2: The Enforcement of the Law, Stevens & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sverre Raffnsøe et al (2014) ‘Foucault’s Dispositive: The Perspicacity of Dispositive Analytics in Organisational Research’ Organisation 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip Rawlings (2002) Policing: A Short History, Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Geoffrey Robertson (1994) ‘Entrapment Evidence: Manna from Heaven, or Fruit of the Poisoned Tree?’ November Criminal Law Review 805.
   Google Scholar
• Colin Rogers et al (2011) Police Work: Principles and Practice, Willan Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Secretary of State for the Home Department (UK) (1929) Report of the Royal Commission on Police Powers and Procedure, HM Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Sybil Sharpe (1996) ‘Covert Policing: A Comparative View’ 25 Anglo-American Law Review 163.
   Google Scholar
• Steven Smith et al (2009) ‘Using the “Mr Big” Technique to Elicit Confessions: Successful Innovation or Dangerous Development in the Canadian Legal System?’ 15 Psychology, Public Policy and Law 168. doi: 10.1037/a0016962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steven Smith et al (2010) ‘High-Risk Interrogation: Using the “Mr. Big Technique” to Elicit Confessions’ 34 Law and Human Behavior 39. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9203-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter Stelfox (2009) Criminal Investigation: An Introduction to Principles and Practice, Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Donald Stewart (1986) Royal Commission of Inquiry into Alleged Telephone Interceptions, Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Francois Eugene Vidocq (2003) Memoirs of Vidocq: Master of Crime, AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaspar Villadsen (2008) ‘Doing Without State and Civil Society as Universals: ‘Dispositifs’ of Care Beyond the Classic Sector Divide’ 4 Journal of Civil Society 171. doi: 10.1080/17448680802559768
   Google Scholar
• Kaspar Villadsen (2011) ‘Modern Welfare and “Good Old” Philanthropy’ 13 Public Management Review 1057. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2011.622675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean Wilson and Mark Finnane (2006) ‘From Sleuths to Technicians? Changing Images of the Detective in Victoria’ in Clive Emsley and Haia Shpayer-Makov (eds) Police Detectives in History, 1750–1950, Ashgate 135.
   Google Scholar
• Justice James Wood (1997) Report of the Royal Commission into the NSW Police Service, New South Wales Government.
   Google Scholar
• Alan Wright (2002) Policing: An Introduction to Concepts and Practice, Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar