Responses to family and domestic violence: supporting women?

References

• Secondary Sources
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) (2014) Specialist Homelessness Services: 2013–2014. Cat. No. HOU 276. NSW Supplmentary Tables, AIHW.
   Google Scholar
• Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety Limited (ANROWS) (2014) National Research Agenda to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children, ANROWS.
   Google Scholar
• Marian Baird, Ludo McFerran and Ingrid Wright (2014) ‘An Equality Bargaining Breakthrough: Paid Domestic Violence Leave’ 56 Journal of Industrial Relations 190–207. doi: 10.1177/0022185613517471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C Baker, K Billhardt, J Warren, C Rollins and N Glass (2010) ‘Domestic Violence, Housing Instability and Homelessness: A Review of Housing Policies and Program Practices for Meeting the Needs of Survivors’ 15 Aggression and Violent Behavior 430–439. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2010.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A Beer, D Faulkner and M Gabriel (2006) 21st Century Housing Careers and Australia’s Housing Futures: Research Paper 1, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Southern Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Jan Breckenridge Inara Walden and Gabrielle Flax (2014) Staying Home Leaving Violence Evaluation Final Report, Gendered Violence Research Network, UNSW Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Elizabeth Ben-Ishai (2009) ‘The Autonomy-Fostering State: “Coordinated Fragmentation” and Domestic Violence Services’ 17 Journal of Political Philosophy 307–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00315.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochelle Braaf and Isobelle Barrett Meyering (2011) Seeking Security: Promoting Women’s Economic Wellbeing Following Domestic Violence, Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Jan Breckenridge (1999) ‘Of Subjugation and Silences: The Role of the Professions in Shaping Cultural Understandings of Sexual and Domestic Violence’ in J Breckenridge and L Laing (eds) Challenging Silence-Innovative Responses to Sexual and Domestic Violence, Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Jan Breckenridge, Donna Chung, Angela Spinney and Carole Zufferey (2015) National Mapping and Meta-Evaluation Outlining Key Features of Effective “Safe at Home” Programs that Enhance Safety and Prevent Homelessness for Women and their Children who have Experienced Domestic and Family Violence, Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety Limited (ANROWS).
   Google Scholar
• Jan Breckenridge, Jen Hamer, BJ Newton and kylie valentine (2013) NSW Homelessness Action Plan Extended Evaluation: Final Evaluation Report for Long-Term Accommodation and Support for Women and Children Experiencing Domestic and Family Violence (4 reports), Centre for Gender Related Violence Studies and the Social Policy Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Innovative Justice (2015) Opportunities for Early Intervention: Bringing Perpetrators of Family Violence Into View, Centre for Innovative Justice, RMIT University.
   Google Scholar
• Judy C Chang, Diane Dado, Susan Ashton, Lynn Hawker, Patricia A Cluss, Raquel Buranosky and Sarah Hudson Scholle (2006) ‘Understanding Behavior Change for Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence: Mapping the Ups and Downs Using the Stages of Change’ 62 Patient Education and Counseling 330–339. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donna Chung, Rosemary Kennnedy, Bev O’Brien and Sarah Wendt (2000) The Link between Domestic and Family Violence and Women’s Homelessness, Wesnet and the Department of Family and Community Services.
   Google Scholar
• Tanya Corrie and Magdalena McGuire (2013) Economic Abuse: Searching for Solutions, a Spotlight on Economic Abuse: Research Report, Good Shepherd Youth and Family Services.
   Google Scholar
• Natasha Cortis and Jane Bullen (2015) Building Effective Policies and Services to Promote Women’s Economic Security Following Domestic Violence, ANROWS.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Australian Governments (2013) National Plan to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children: Including the First Three-Year Action Plan, Council of Australian Governments.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Australian Governments COAG Communique, COAG meeting, 17 April 2015, (Canberra 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Belinda Fehlberg and Christine Millward (2014) ‘Family Violence and Financial Outcomes after Parental Separation’ in A Hayes and D Higgins (eds) Families, Policy and the Law: Selected Essays on Contemporary Issues for Australia, Australian Institute of Family Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Pamela Y Frasier, Lisa Slatt, Vicki Kowlowitz and Patricia T Glowa (2001) ‘Using the Stages of Change Model to Counsel Victims of Intimate Partner Violence’ 43 Patient Education and Counseling 211–217. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00152-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthew Gray, David De Vaus, Lixia Qu and David Stanton (2011) ‘Divorce and the Wellbeing of Older Australians’ 31 Ageing & Society 475–498. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X10001017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brian W Head (2008) ‘Three Lenses of Evidence-based Policy’ 67 Australian Journal of Public Administration 1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00564.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liz Kelly (1988) Surviving Sexual Violence, Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ludo McFerran (2010) It Could Be You: Female, Single, Older and Homeless, Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Suellen Murray (2008) ‘Why Doesn’t She Just Leave? Belonging, Disruption and Domestic Violence’ 31 Women’s Studies International Forum 5–72. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2007.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cate Nunan and Llewellyn John (1996) Raising the Roof on Women’s Homelessness: A Framework for Policy Development, Women’s Emergency Services Network.
   Google Scholar
• Judy L Postmus and Sur Ah Hahn (2007) ‘The Collaboration between Welfare and Advocacy Organisations: Learning from the Experiences of Domestic Violence Survivors’ 88 Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services 475–484. doi: 10.1606/1044-3894.3658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James O Prochaska, Carlo C DiClemente and John C Norcross (1992) ‘In Search of how People Change: Applications to Addictive Behaviors’ 47 American Psychologist 1102–1114. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission (2014) Access to Justice Arrangements, Commonwealth of Australia 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lisbeth Schorr (2003) Determining “What Works” in Social Programs and Social Policies: Toward a More Inclusive Knowledge Base, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce Smyth and Ruth Weston (2000) Financial Living Standards after Divorce: A Recent Snapshot, Aistralian Institute of Family Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Angela Spinney (2012) Home and Safe? Policy and Practice Innovations to Prevent Women and Children who have Experienced Domestic and Family Violence from Becoming Homeless, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Evan Stark (2007) Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cris M Sullivan (2011) ‘Evaluating Domestic Violence Support Service Programs: Waste of Time, Necessary Evil, or Opportunity for Growth?’ 16 Aggression and Violent Behavior 354–360. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2011.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige L Sweet (2015) ‘Chronic Victims, Risky Women: Domestic Violence Advocacy and the Medicalization of Abuse’ 41 Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 81–106. doi: 10.1086/681772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selina Tually, Debbie Faulkner, Cecile Cutler and Michele Slatter (2008) Women, Domestic and Family Violence and Homelessness, Flinders Institute for Housing, Urban and Regional Research Australia, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Nicole Westmarland and Liz Kelly (2013) ‘Why Extending Measurements of ‘Success’ in Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programmes Matters for Social Work’ 43 British Journal of Social Work 1092–1110. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar