Employment as a relational contract and the impact on remedies for breach

References

• Secondary Sources
   Google Scholar
• Tareq Al-Tawil (2011) ‘The Efficient Breach Theory: The Moral Objection’ 20 Griffith Law Review 449.
   Google Scholar
• Katy Barnett (2016) ‘Great Expectations: A Dissection of Expectation Damages in Contract in Australia and England’ 33 Journal of Contract Law 163.
   Google Scholar
• Hugh Beale and Tony Dugdale (1975) ‘Contracts between Businessmen: Planning and the Use of Contractual Remedies’ 2 British Journal of Law and Society 45.
   Google Scholar
• Robert C Bird (2005) ‘Employment as a Relational Contract’ 8 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labour and Employment Law 149.
   Google Scholar
• Matthew Boyle (2007) ‘The Relational Principle of Trust and Confidence’ 27 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 633.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Bridge (1984) ‘Contractual Damages for Intangible Loss: A Comparative Analysis’ 62 Canadian Bar Review 323.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas Brodie (1998) ‘Specific Performance in Employment Contracts’ 27 Industrial Law Journal 37.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas Brodie (2011) ‘How Relational Is the Employment Contract?’ 40 Industrial Law Journal 232.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas Brodie (2016a) ‘Relational Contracts’ in M Freedland (ed) The Contract of Employment, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas Brodie (2016b) ‘The Autonomy of the Common Law of the Contract of Employment from the General Law of Contract’ in M Freedland et al (eds) The Contract of Employment, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas Brodie (2016c) ‘The Dynamics of Common Law Evolution’ 32 International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ian Callinan (1994) ‘An Over-Mighty Court?’ (Paper presented at the Fourth Conference of the Samuel Griffith Society, Brisbane, 29–31 July 1994).
   Google Scholar
• David Campbell and Susan Clay (1995) Long-Term Contracting: A Research Bibliography and Review of the Literature, Oxford Centre for Sociolegal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• David Campbell (ed) (2001) The Relational Theory of Contract: Selected Works of Ian Macneil, Sweet & Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• David Campbell and Donald Harris (2002) ‘In Defence of Breach: A Critique of Restitution and the Performance Interest’ 22 Legal Studies 208.
   Google Scholar
• David Campbell (2005) ‘The Relational Constitution of Remedy: Cooperation as the Implicit Second Principle of Remedies for Breach of Contract’ 11 Texas Wesleyan Law Review 455.
   Google Scholar
• David Campbell and Roger Halson (2013) ‘The Irrelevance of the Performance Interest: A Comparative Analysis of “Keep-Open” Covenants in Scotland and England’ in L DiMatteo et al (eds) Commercial Contract Law: Transatlantic Perspectives, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• David Campbell, Linda Mulcahy and Sally Wheeler (2013) Changing Conceptions of Contract: Essays in Honour of Ian Macneil, Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• David Campbell (2014) ‘Good Faith and the Ubiquity of the “Relational” Contract’ 77 Modern Law Review 460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John Carter et al (2007) Contract Law in Australia, 5th edn, LexisNexis Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• John Carter et al (2015) ‘Terms Implied in Law: “Trust and Confidence” in the High Court of Australia’ 32 Journal of Contract Law 203.
   Google Scholar
• Anjali Chaudry et al (2009) ‘A Sensemaking Model of Employee Evaluation of Psychological Contract Fulfilment’ 45 Journal of Applied Behavioural Science 498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maree Chetwin (2014) ‘Relational and Discrete Contracts and Remedies Requiring Supervision: Same Principles?’ 38 University of Western Australia Law Review 80.
   Google Scholar
• Lisa Chighine (2015) ‘Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker—No Implied Term of Mutual Trust and Confidence in Employment Contracts, But Door Still Open for Good Faith’ 28 Australian Journal of Labour Law 77.
   Google Scholar
• Tamara Cohen (2012) ‘The Relational Contract of Employment’ 2012 Acta Juridica 84.
   Google Scholar
• Hugh Collins (1986) ‘Market Power, Bureaucratic Power, and the Contract of Employment’ 15 Industrial Law Journal 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hugh Collins (2013) ‘The Contract of Employment in 3D’ in D Campbell, L Mulcahy and S Wheeler (eds) Changing Concepts of Contract, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hugh Collins (2015) ‘Contractual Autonomy’ in A Bogg et al (eds) The Autonomy of Labour Law, Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hugh Collins (2016) ‘Is a Relational Contract a Legal Concept?’ in S Degeling, J Edelman and J Goudkamp (eds) Contract in Commercial Law, Thomson Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne Courtney and John Carter (2014) ‘Implied Terms: What is the Role of Construction?’ 31 Journal of Contract Law 151.
   Google Scholar
• Jacqueline A-M Coyle-Shapiro et al (eds) (2004) The Employment Relationship: Examining Psychological and Contextual Perspectives, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breen Creighton, William Ford and Richard Mitchell (1993) Labour Law: Text and Materials, Law Book Co.
   Google Scholar
• Albert Venn Dicey (1885) Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bill Dixon (2005) ‘Common Law Obligations of Good Faith in Australian Commercial Contracts—A Relational Recipe’ 33 Australian Business Law Review 87.
   Google Scholar
• John Doyle (1995) ‘Judicial Law Making—Is Honesty the Best Policy?’ 17 Adelaide Law Review 161.
   Google Scholar
• KD Ewing and Andrew Grubb (1987) ‘The Emergence of a New Labour Injunction?’ 16 Industrial Law Journal 145.
   Google Scholar
• JM Feinman (1987) ‘Contract After the Fall’ 39 Stanford Law Review 1537.
   Google Scholar
• Mark Freedland et al (eds) (2016) The Contract of Employment, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel Friedmann (1995) ‘The Performance Interest in Contract Damages’ 111 Law Quarterly Review 628.
   Google Scholar
• Gail Furness (1989) ‘Injunctions and the Contract of Employment’ 2 Australian Journal of Labour Law 234.
   Google Scholar
• Marc Galanter (1983) ‘The Radiating Effects of Courts’ in K Boylum and L Mather (eds) Empirical Theories About Courts, Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Chief Justice Murray Gleeson (2000) ‘Judicial Legitimacy’ 20 Australian Bar Review 4.
   Google Scholar
• Charles Goetz and Robert Scott (1981) ‘Principles of Relational Contracts’ 67 Virgnia Law Review 1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor Goldberg (1980) ‘Relational Exchange: Economics and Complex Contracts’ 23 American Behavioural Scientist 337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielle Golding (2015) ‘Terms Implied by Law into Employment Contracts: Are they Necessary?’ 28 Australian Journal of Labour Law 113.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielle Golding (2016) ‘The Role of Judges in the Regulation of Employment Contracts’ 32 International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielle Golding (2017) Terms Implied by Law into Employment Contracts: Rethinking their Rationale, PhD thesis, University of Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielle Golding (2019) ‘The Distinctiveness of the Employment Contract’ 32 Australian Journal of Labour Law 170.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony Gray (2015) ‘Good Faith in Australian Contract Law After Barker’ 43 Australian Business Law Review 358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David Guest (2004) ‘The Psychology of the Employment Relationship: An Analysis Based on the Psychological Contract’ 53 Applied Psychology: An International Review 541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roger Halson (2015) ‘The Recovery of Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in the United Kingdom: A Critique and Proposal for a New Structure Integrating Recovery in Contract and Tort’ 3 The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 245.
   Google Scholar
• Carol Harlow (1994) ‘Changing the Mindset: The Place of Theory in English Administrative Law’ 14 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 419.
   Google Scholar
• Donald Harris, David Campbell and Roger Halson (2005) Remedies in Contract and Tort, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Justice Kenneth Hayne (2001) ‘Letting Justice Be Done Without the Heavens Falling’ 27 Monash University Law Review 12.
   Google Scholar
• Martin Hogg (2012) Promises and Contract Law: Comparative Perspectives, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonathan Levin (2002) ‘Multilateral Contracting and the Employment Relationship’ 117 Quarterly Journal of Economics 1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart Macaulay (1963) ‘Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study’ 28 American Sociological Review 55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart Macaulay (2007) ‘Renegotiations and Settlements: Dr Pangloss’ Notes on the Margins of David Campbell’s Papers’ 29 Cardozo Law Review 261.
   Google Scholar
• Ian Macneil (1974) ‘The Many Futures of Contract’ 47 Southern California Law Review 691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ian Macneil (1978) ‘Contracts: Adjustment of Long-Term Economic Relations Under Classical, Neoclassical, and Relational Contract Law’ 72 Northwestern University Law Review 854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ian Macneil (1980) The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations, Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ian Macneil (1982) ‘Efficient Breach, Circles in the Sky’ 68 Virginia Law Review 947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ian Macneil (1983) ‘Values in Contract: Internal and External’ 78 Northwestern University Law Review 340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ian Macneil (1986) ‘Exchange Revisited: Individual Utility and Social Solidarity’ 96 Ethics 567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ian Macneil (1987a) ‘Barriers to the Idea of Relational Contracts (The Complex Long-Term Contract, Structures and International Arbitration)’ in F Nicklisch (ed) Der Komplexe Langzeitvertrag. Strukturen und Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, Müller Juristischer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ian Macneil (1987b) ‘Relational Contract Theory as Sociology: A Reply to Professors Lindenberg and de Vos’ 143 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ian Macneil (1988a) ‘A Brief Comment on Farnsworth’s “Suggestions for the Future”’ 38 Journal of Legal Education 301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ian Macneil (1988b) ‘Contract Remedies: A Need for a Better Efficiency Analysis’ 144 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 6.
   Google Scholar
• Ewan McKendrick (1995) ‘The Regulation of Long-Term Contracts in English Law’ in J Beatson and D Friedman (eds) Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law, Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrie Menkel-Meadow (1984) ‘Toward Another View of Legal Negotiation: The Structure of Problem Solving’ 31 UCLA Law Review 754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catherine Mitchell (2013) Contract Law and Contract Practice—Bridging the Gap Between Legal Reasoning and Commercial Expectation, Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Catherine Mitchell (2019) ‘Remedies and Reality in the Law of Contract’ in R Halson and D Campbell (eds) Research Handbook on Remedies in Private Law, Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Matthew Moir (2011) ‘Discretion, Good Faith and Employer Control Over Executive Remuneration’ 24 Australian Journal of Labour Law 121.
   Google Scholar
• Robert Mnookin and Lewis Kornhauser (1979) ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce’ 88 Yale Law Journal 950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linda Mulcahy and Cathy Andrews (2010) ‘Baird Textile Holdings v Marks & Spencer plc’ in R Hunter, C McGlynn and E Rackley (eds) Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice, Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Paul O’Grady (2016) ‘Nothing Implied: Construction as a Means of Curbing the Excessive Use of Power in Employment Contracts’ (Paper presented at the Eight Biennial National Conference of the Australian Labour Law Association, 4–5 November 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Elisabeth Peden (2000) ‘“Cooperation” in English Contract Law – To Construe or Imply?’ 16 Journal of Contract Law 56.
   Google Scholar
• Elisabeth Peden (2003) Good Faith in the Performance of Contracts, LexisNexis Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Jeremias Prassl (2015) The Concept of the Employer, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frederic Reynold QC (2015) ‘Bad Behaviour and the Implied Term of Mutual Trust and Confidence: Is There a Problem?’ 44 Industrial Law Journal 262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joellen Riley (2005) Employee Protection at Common Law, Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joellen Riley (2012) ‘Siblings But Not Twins: Making Sense of “Mutual Trust” and “Good Faith” in Employment Contracts’ 36 Melbourne University Law Review 521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DM Rousseau (1989) ‘Psychological and Implied Contracts in Organisations’ 2 Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 121.
   Google Scholar
• DM Rousseau (1995) Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Robert Scott (2013) ‘The Promise and Peril of Relational Contract Theory’ in J Baucher, J Kidwell and W Whitford (eds) Revisiting the Contracts Scholarship of Stewart Macaulay, Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Richard Speidel (2000) ‘The Characteristics and Challenges of Relational Contracts’ 94 Northwestern University Law Review 823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew Stewart et al (2016) Creighton and Stewart’s Labour Law, 6th edn, Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robert Stevens (2009) ‘Damages and the Right to Performance: A Golden Victory or Not?’ in J Neyers, R Bronaugh and S Pitel (eds) Exploring Contract Law, Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• K V W Stone (2001) ‘The New Psychological Contract: Implications of the Changing Workplace for Labour and Employment Law’ 48 UCLA Law Review 519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong Xing Tan (2019) ‘Disrupting Doctrine? Revisiting the Doctrinal Impact of Relational Contract Theory’ 39 Legal Studies 98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cases
   Google Scholar
• Addis v Gramophone Co Ltd [1909] AC 488.
   Google Scholar
• Aldersea v Public Transport Corp (2001) 3 VR 499.
   Google Scholar
• Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon (1993) 176 CLR 344.
   Google Scholar
• Bates v Post Office Ltd (No 3) [2019] EWHC 606.
   Google Scholar
• Beck v Darling Downs Institute of Advanced Education (1990) 140 IR 364.
   Google Scholar
• Bobux Marketing Ltd v Raynor Marketing Ltd [2001] NZCA 348.
   Google Scholar
• Bostik (Australia) Pty Ltd v Gorgevski (1992) 36 FCR 20.
   Google Scholar
• Breen v Williams (1996) 186 CLR 72.
   Google Scholar
• Bunge SA v Nidera BV [2015] UKSC 43.
   Google Scholar
• Burazin v Blacktown City Guardian Pty Ltd (1996) 142 ALR 144.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410.
   Google Scholar
• C v T Borough Council [2014] EWHC 2482.
   Google Scholar
• Castlemaine Tooheys v Carlton & United Breweries (1987) 10 NSWLR 468.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker (2013) 214 FCR 450.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker (2014) 253 CLR 169.
   Google Scholar
• Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Bilgola Enterprises Ltd (1999) 8 TCLR 612.
   Google Scholar
• Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Todd [2002] 2 All ER 849.
   Google Scholar
• Falcko v James McEwan & Co [1977] VR 447.
   Google Scholar
• Flyn v Breccia [2015] IEHC 547.
   Google Scholar
• GEC Marconi Systems Pty Limited v BHP Information Technology Pty Limited (2003) 128 FCR 1.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory v Philip Morris Ltd (1988) 80 ALR 455.
   Google Scholar
• Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 156 ER 145.
   Google Scholar
• J C Williamson Ltd v Lukey and Mulholland (1931) 45 CLR 282.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrett v Commissioner of Police (NSW) (2005) 224 CLR 44.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson v Unisys [2003] 1 AC 518.
   Google Scholar
• Moore v Scenic Tours Pty Ltd (2020) 377 CLR 209.
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales v Paige (2002) 60 NSWLR 371.
   Google Scholar
• Oldcastle v Guinea Airways Ltd (1956) SASR 325.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn v Gray (2009) 184 IR 279.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn v Overland (2010) 199 IR 40.
   Google Scholar
• Re Associated Dominions Assurance Society Pty Ltd (1962) 109 CLR 516.
   Google Scholar
• Reed v Madon [1989] Ch 408.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly v Victoria (1991) 5 VIR 1.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Ex Rep 850.
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberger Australia Pty Ltd v Poulsen (2003) 58 NSWLR 288.
   Google Scholar
• Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth [1995] 3 All ER 268.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw v New South Wales (2012) 219 IR 87.
   Google Scholar
• Sheikh Al Nehayan v Kent [2018] EWHC 333.
   Google Scholar
• South Australia v McDonald (2009) 104 SASR 344.
   Google Scholar
• Swearing in of Sir Owen Dixon as Chief Justice (1952) 85 CLR xi.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker v Pipeline Authority (1981) 3 IR 120.
   Google Scholar
• Vision Eye Institute Ltd v Kitchen [2014] QSC 260.
   Google Scholar
• White v Australian and New Zealand Theatres Ltd (1943) 67 CLR 266.
   Google Scholar
• WT Partnership (Aust) Pty Ltd v Sheldrick (1999) 96 IR 202.
   Google Scholar
• Yam Seng Pte Ltd v International Trade Corp Ltd [2013] EWHC 111.
   Google Scholar