On Praising Convergent Thinking: Creativity as Blind Variation and Selective Retention

REFERENCES

• Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths & mechanisms (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, K. S., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., & Parker, K. (1990). Intuition in the context of discovery. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 72–110. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(90)90004-n
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400. doi:10.1037/h0040373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 391–404. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cziko, G. A. (1998). From blind to creative: In defense of Donald Campbell's selectionist theory of human creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 192–209. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00815.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K. (2011). From past to future art: The creative impact of Picasso's 1935 Minotauromachy on his 1937 Guernica. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 360–369. doi:10.1037/a0023017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K. (2014). Diversifying experiences in the development of genius and their impact on creative cognition. In D. K. Simonton (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 375–393). Oxford, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K. (2015). Psychopathology, adversity, and creativity: Diversifying experiences in the development of eminent African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 623–636. doi:10.1037/pspi0000011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B. (2007). An early history of hindsight research. Social Cognition, 25, 10–13. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabora, L. (2007). Why the creative process is not Darwinian: Comment on “the creative process in Picasso's Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements versus nonmonotonic variants.” Creativity Research Journal, 19, 361–365. doi:10.1080/10400410701753317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronfeldner, M. E. (2010). Darwinian ‘blind’ hypothesis formation revisited. Synthese, 175, 193–218. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9498-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zythow, J. M. (1987). Scientific discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans. II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 12, 181–194. doi:10.1037/h0071361
   Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness, R. B. (2013). Genius unmasked. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickles, T. (2003). Evolutionary models of innovation and the Meno problem. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 54–78). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 92–96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2008). Creativity, innovation, and nonobviousness. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 12, 461–487.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1984). Creative productivity and age: A mathematical model based on a two-step cognitive process. Developmental Review, 4, 77–111. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(84)90020-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2007a). The creative imagination in Picasso's Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements or nonmonotonic variants? Creativity Research Journal, 19, 329–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2007b). Rejoinder: Picasso's Guernica creativity as a Darwinian process: Definitions, clarifications, misconceptions, and applications. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 381–394. doi:10.1080/10400410701753341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2009). Varieties of (scientific) creativity: A hierarchical model of disposition, development, and achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 441–452. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01152.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 156–179. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2010.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2011a). Creativity and discovery as blind variation and selective retention: Multiple-variant definitions and blind-sighted integration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 222–228. doi:10.1037/a0023144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2011b). Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell's (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 15, 158–174. doi:10.1037/a0022912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2012a). Combinatorial creativity and sightedness: Monte Carlo simulations using three-criterion definitions. International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 22(2), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2012b). Creativity, problem solving, and solution set sightedness: Radically reformulating BVSR. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 48–65. doi:10.1002/jocb.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2012c). Foresight, insight, oversight, and hindsight in scientific discovery: How sighted were Galileo's telescopic sightings? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 243–254. doi:10.1037/a0027058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2012d). Taking the US Patent Office creativity criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97–106. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.676974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2013a). Creative problem solving as sequential BVSR: Exploration (total ignorance) versus elimination (informed guess). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2013b). Creative thought as blind variation and selective retention: Why sightedness is inversely related to creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 33, 253–266.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2013c). You, too, can become a genius! IF you just … [Review of the book Genius Unmasked, R. B. Ness]. PsycCRITIQUES, 58(45). doi:10.1037/a0034757
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2014a). Hierarchies of creative domains: Disciplinary constraints on blind-variation and selective-retention. In E. S. Paul & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The philosophy of creativity: New essays (pp. 247–261). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2014b). More method in the mad-genius controversy: A historiometric study of 204 historic creators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 53–61. doi:10.1037/a0035367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2014c). Thomas Edison's creative career: The multilayered trajectory of trials, errors, failures, and triumphs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(1), 2–14. doi:10.1037/a0037722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K., & Damian, R. I. (2013). Creativity. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 795–807). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in human creativity: Is variation blind or sighted? Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 159–176. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00813.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1999). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3, 83–100. doi:10.1037//1089-2680.3.2.83
   Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. (2012). Creative combination of representations: Scientific discovery and technological invention. In R. Proctor & E. J. Capaldi (Eds.), Psychology of science: Implicit and explicit processes (pp. 389–405). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. D. (1968). The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. New York, NY: Atheneum.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W. (2004). On structure in the creative process: A quantitative case-study of the creation of Picasso's Guernica. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 23–54. doi:10.2190/eh48-k59c-dfrb-lxe7
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W., & Hass, R. (2007). Commentaries: We are all partly right: Comment on Simonton. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 345–360. doi:10.1080/10400410701753309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar