Stimulating Creativity: Modulation of Convergent and Divergent Thinking by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

REFERENCES

• Akbari Chermahini, S., Hickendorff, M., & Hommel, B. (2012). Development and validity of a Dutch version of the Remote Associates Task: An item-response theory approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 177–186. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbari Chermahini, S., & Hommel, B. (2010). The (b) link between creativity and dopamine: Spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking. Cognition, 115(3), 458–465. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansburg, P. I., & Hill, K. (2003). Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(7), 1141–1152. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00104-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., Geng, J. J., & Shomstein, S. (2004). Parietal cortex and attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14(2), 212–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, E. M. (1997). The effect of reportable and unreportable hints on anagram solution and the aha! experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 6(4), 545–573. doi:10.1006/ccog.1997.0325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(4), 634–639. doi:10.3758/bf03195543
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowden, E. M., Jung-Beeman, M., Fleck, J., & Kounios, J. (2005). New approaches to demystifying insight. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 322–328. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunoni, A. R., Amadera, J., Berbel, B., Volz, M. S., Rizzerio, B. G., & Fregni, F. (2011). A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 14(08), 1133–1145. doi:10.1017/s1461145710001690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerruti, C., & Schlaug, G. (2009). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex enhances complex verbal associative thought. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(10), 1980–1987. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, R. P., & Snyder, A. W. (2011). Facilitate insight by non-invasive brain stimulation. PloS One, 6(2), e16655. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, R. P., & Snyder, A. W. (2012). Brain stimulation enables the solution of an inherently difficult problem. Neuroscience Letters, 515(2), 121–124. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrysikou, E. G., Hamilton, R. H., Coslett, H. B., Datta, A., Bikson, M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2013). Noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation over the left prefrontal cortex facilitates cognitive flexibility in tool use. Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(2), 81–89. doi:10.1080/17588928.2013.768221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colzato, L. S., de Haan, A., & Hommel, B. (2015). Food for creativity: Tyrosine promotes deep thinking. Psychological Research, 79, 709–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colzato, L. S., Ozturk, A., & Hommel, B. (2012). Meditate to create: The impact of focused-attention and open-monitoring training on convergent and divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 116, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colzato, L. S., Szapora, A., Pannekoek, J. N., & Hommel, B. (2013). The impact of physical exercise on convergent and divergent thinking. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 842. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockery, C. A., Hueckel-Weng, R., Birbaumer, N., & Plewnia, C. (2009). Enhancement of planning ability by transcranial direct current stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(22), 7271–7277. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0065-09.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Gebauer, D., Reishofer, G., Koschutnig, K., & Ebner, F. (2010). Enhancing creativity by means of cognitive stimulation: Evidence from an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 52(4), 1687–1695. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64(2), 110–118. doi:10.1037/h0048280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2012). Convergent and divergent operations in cognitive search. In P. M. Todd T. T. Hills, & T. W. Robbins (Eds.), Cognitive search: Evolution, algorithms, and the brain, 221–235.
   Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.52.6.1122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, L., Goren, N., Lavidor, M., & Levy, D. A. (2012). Oppositional transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of parietal substrates of attention during encoding modulates episodic memory. Brain Research, 1439, 66–72. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.12.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E. M., Haberman, J., Frymiare, J. L., Arambel-Liu, S., Greenblatt, R., & Kounios, J. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biology, 2(4), 500–510. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadosh, R. C. (2013). Using transcranial electrical stimulation to enhance cognitive functions in the typical and atypical brain. Translational Neuroscience, 4(1), 20–33. doi:10.2478/s13380-013-0104-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, W. (1924). The mentality of apes. Schwyzer, Hubert: Unity of Understanding-A Study in Kantian Problems.
   Google Scholar
• Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2009). The aha! moment: The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(4), 210–216. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01638.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 71–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowatari, Y., Lee, S. H., Yamamura, H., Nagamori, Y., Levy, P., Yamane, S., & Yamamoto, M. (2009). Neural networks involved in artistic creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 30(5), 1678–1690. doi:10.1002/hbm.20633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232. doi:10.1037/h0048850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metuki, N., Sela, T., & Lavidor, M. (2012). Enhancing cognitive control components of insight problems solving by anodal tDCS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Brain Stimulation, 5(2), 110–115. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2012.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche, M. A., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., Antal, A., Tergau, F., & Paulus, W. (2003). Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114(11), 2220–2222. doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00235-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priori, A. (2003). Brain polarization in humans: A reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non-invasive modulation of brain excitability. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114(4), 589–595. doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00437-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 137–154. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.571191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sela, T., Ivry, R. B., & Lavidor, M. (2012). Prefrontal control during a semantic decision task that involves idiom comprehension: A transcranial direct current stimulation study. Neuropsychologia, 50(9), 2271–2280. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Adler, N., Aharon-Peretz, J., Perry, D., & Mayseless, N. (2011). The origins of originality: The neural bases of creative thinking and originality. Neuropsychologia, 49(2), 178–185. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 311–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of Creativity, 1, 3–15. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807916.003
   Google Scholar
• Zmigrod, S. (2014). The role of the parietal cortex in multisensory and response integration: Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Multisensory Research, 27(2), 161–172. doi:10.1163/22134808-00002449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmigrod, S., Colzato, L. S., & Hommel, B. (2014). Evidence for a role of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in controlling stimulus-response integration: A transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) study. Brain Stimulation, 7(4), 516–520. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar