Extroversion Personality, Domain Knowledge, and the Creativity of New Product Development Engineers

REFERENCES

• Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2014). Assessing associative distance among ideas elicited by tests of divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), 229–238. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.901095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnoli, S., Corazza, G. E., & Runco, M. A. (2016). Estimating creativity with a multiple-measurement approach within scientific and artistic domains. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 171–176. doi:10.1080/10400419.2016.1162475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., & Khaire, M. (2008). Creativity and the role of the leader. Harvard Business Review, 86, 100–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634–665. doi:10.2307/2393475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two - step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297–1333. doi:10.1177/0149206314527128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (Ed.). (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner, & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brockman, B. K., & Morgan, R. M. (2003). The role of existing knowledge in new product innovativeness and performance. Decision Sciences, 34, 385–419. doi:10.1111/1540-5915.02326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 875–893. doi:10.2307/3069319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62–83. doi:10.1177/109442810141004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, Y. H., Shih, H. A., & Hsu, C. C. (2014). High commitment work system, transactive memory system, and new product performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(4), 631–640. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T. J., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI–R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny yet effective measures of the big five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192–203. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-McIntyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 618–630. doi:10.2307/30040653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 613−617. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., & Nederstrom, M. (2010). Ability, demographic and personality predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 957–961. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good–doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work–organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 310–329. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. L., Lim, H. S., Luciano, M. M., & Choi, J. N. (2013). Unpacking the cross‐level effects of tenure diversity, explicit knowledge, and knowledge sharing on individual creativity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(2), 203–222. doi:10.1111/joop.2013.86.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: A framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1081–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7(1), 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., Cheung, S.-Y., Wang, M., & Huang, J.-C. (2012). Unfolding the proactive process for creativity integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives. Journal of Management, 38(5), 1611–1633. doi:10.1177/0149206310380250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.59215085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. P. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 180–190. doi:10.2307/3069345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029–1045. doi:10.2307/3069328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, K. N., Moon, S. M., & French, B. (2011). Differential effects of divergent thinking, domain knowledge, and interest on creative performance in art and math. Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 60–71. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.545750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Ilgen, D. R., Jundt, D., & Meyer, C. J. (2006). Cutthroat cooperation: Asymmetrical adaptation of team reward structures. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 103–119. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20785533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H., Chuang, A. C., & Joshi, A. (2008). Perceived deep-level dissimilarity: Personality antecedents and impact on overall job attitude, helping, work withdrawal, and turnover. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 106–124. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1090–1109. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.54533207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melero, E., & Palomeras, N. (2015). The Renaissance Man is not dead! The role of generalists in teams of inventors. Research Policy, 44(1), 154–167. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, J. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 85–101. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2014). “Big C, little c” creativity as a false dichotomy: Reality is not categorical. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 131–132. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.873676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2015). A commentary on the social perspective on creativity. Creativity. Theories–Research-Applications, 2(1), 21–31. doi:10.1515/ctra-2015-0003
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Hyeon Paek, S., & Jaeger, G. (2015). Is Creativity Being Supported? Further Analyses of Grants and Awards for Creativity Research. Creativity Research Journal, 27(1), 107–110. doi:10.1080/10400419.2015.992692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Noble, E. P., Reiter-Palmon, R., Acar, S., Ritchie, T., & Yurkovich, J. M. (2011). The genetic basis of creativity and ideational fluency. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 376–380. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.621859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sak, U., & Maker, C. J. (2006). Developmental variation in children’s creative mathematical thinking as a function of schooling, age, and knowledge. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 279–291. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen, J. L. (2015). Effects of implicit achievement motivation, expected evaluations, and domain knowledge on creative performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(3), 319–338. doi:10.1002/job.v36.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–958. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1999). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106(3), 435. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500–517. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532–547. doi:10.5465/amj.2005.17407918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1992). On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the Five-Factor model. Journal of Personality, 60, 441–476. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00980.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R., Runco, M. A., & Berlow, E. (2016). Mapping the themes, impact, and cohesion of creativity research over the last 25 years. Creativity Research Journal, 28(4), 385–394. doi:10.1080/10400419.2016.1230358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. M., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107–128. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar