612
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Influence of a Foreign Versus Native Language on Creativity

REFERENCES

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
  • Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for-reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 14–23. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.14
  • Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood–creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779–806. doi:10.1037/a0012815
  • Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13, 40–52.
  • Costa, A., Foucart, A., Hayakawa, S., Aparici, M., Apestguia, J., Heafner, J., & Keysar, B. (2014). Your morals depend on your language. PLoS One, 9, e94842. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094842
  • Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gocłowska, M. A., Baas, M., Crisp, R. J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014). Whether social schema violations help or hurt creativity depends on need for structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 959–971. doi:10.1177/0146167214533132
  • Gocłowska, M. A., Crisp, R. J., & Labuschagne, K. (2013). Can counter-stereotypes boost flexible thinking? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 217–231. doi:10.1177/1368430212445076
  • Green, J. D., & Campbell, W. K. (2000). Attachment and exploration in adults: Chronic and contextual accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 452–461. doi:10.1177/0146167200266004
  • Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
  • Jia, L., Hirt, E. R., & Karpen, S. C. (2009). Lessons froma faraway land: The effect of spatial distance on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1127–1131. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.015
  • Keysar, B., Hayakawa, S. L., & Gyu, A. S. (2012). The foreign-language effect thinking in a foreign tongue reduces decision biases. Psychological Science, 23, 661–668. doi:10.1177/0956797611432178
  • Leung, A. K. Y., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C. Y. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.169
  • Liberman, N., Polack, O., Hameiri, B., & Blumenfeld, M. (2012). Priming of spatial distance enhances children’s creative performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 663–670. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.09.007
  • Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological Distance. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic Principles (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Maddux, W. W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Cultural borders and mental barriers: The relationship between living abroad and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1047–1061. doi:10.1037/a0014861
  • Marsh, R. L., Ward, T. B., & Landau, J. D. (1999). The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task. Memory & Cognition, 27,1, 94–105. doi:10.3758/BF03201216
  • Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–231. doi:10.1037/h0048850
  • Mueller, J., Wakslak, C. J., & Krishnan, V. (2014). Construing creativity: The how and why of recognizing creative ideas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 81–87. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.007
  • Paulus, P., & Nijstad, B. (Eds.). (2003). Group creativity: An introduction. Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. (pp. 3–11). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Pavlenko, A. (2005). Emotions and Multilingualism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Payne, J. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision-making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366–687. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90022-2
  • Polman, E., & Emich, K. (2011). Decisions for others are more creative than decisions for the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 492–501. doi:10.1177/0146167211398362
  • Rietzschel, E. F., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2007). Personal need for structure and creative performance: The moderating influence of fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 855–866. DOI: 10.1177/0146167207301017
  • Ritter, S. M., Damian, R. I., Simonton, D. K., Van Baaren, R. B., Strick, M., Derks, J., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2012). Diversifying experiences enhance cognitive flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 961–964. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.009
  • Routledge, C., Arndt, J., & Sheldon, K. M. (2004). Task engagement after mortality salience: The effects of creativity, conformity, and connectedness on worldview defense. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 477–487. doi:10.1002/ejsp.209
  • Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
  • Sassenberg, K., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2005). Don’t stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 506–514. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.10.002
  • Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.475
  • Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 31–322. doi:10.1080/00223980.1953.9712897
  • Stephan, E. (2017). The effect of a foreign versus naitive language on exploration. Manuscript submitted for publication. Bar- Ilan University.
  • Stephan, E., Faust, M., & Borodkin, K. (2017). The role of psychological distancing in appreciation of art: Can native versus Foreign language context affect responses to abstract and representational paintings? Manuscript submitted for publication. Bar- Ilan University.
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of Creativity, 1, 3–15.
  • Van Tilburg, W. A. P., & Igou, E. R. (2014). From Van Gogh to Lady Gaga: Artist eccentricity increases perceived artistic skill and art appreciation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 93–103. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1999
  • Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1–40. doi:10.1006/cogp.1994.1010

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.