A Latent Profile Analysis of the Criterion-related Validity of a Divergent Thinking Test

REFERENCES

• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. Ieee Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljughaiman, A., & Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 17–34. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01247.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (1994). Divergent thinking is not a general trait: A multidomain training experiment. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 35–46. doi:10.1080/10400419409534507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57, 289–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borland, J. H. (1986). A note on the existence of certain divergent-production abilities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 9, 239–251.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400. doi:10.1037/h0040373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. W., & Chan, L. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers’ perception of student characteristics in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 185–195. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1203_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chand O’Neal, I., Paek, S. H., & Runco, M. A. (2015). Comparison of competing theories about ideation and creativity. Creativity. Theories–Research-Applications, 2, 145–164.
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, M. M., Cowdery, E. M., King, K. E., & Montang, M. A. (2005). Predicting work activities with divergent thinking Tests_A longitudinal study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 149–167. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01256.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramond, B. (1994). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: From creation through establishment of predictive validity. In R. F. Subotnik, & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Longitudinal studies in contemporary education (pp. 229–254). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 283–291. doi:10.1177/001698620504900402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1984). Being adolescent: Conflict and growth in the teenage years. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. A. (1989). Testing for creative potential. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 257–274. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(89)90014-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer, M., & Collings, J. A. (1991). Teachers’ views about creativity. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 207–219. doi:10.1111/bjep.1991.61.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30, 453–470. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2003.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, K. S., Vance, C. M., Choi, D. Y., & Mendez, J. L. (2008). An examination of the nonlinear thinking style profile stereotype of successful entrepreneurs. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 16, 133–159. doi:10.1142/S0218495808000077
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1968). Creativity, intelligence, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: Knapp/EDITS.
   Google Scholar
• Han, K.–S. (2003). Domain-specificity of creativity in young children: How quantitative and qualitative data support it. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 117–142. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2003.tb00829.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, K.-S., & Marvin, C. (2002). Multiple creativities? Investigating domain-specificity of creativity in young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 98–109. doi:10.1177/001698620204600203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. J., & Bolton, H. (1972). Selecting creativity tests for use in research. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 451–462. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1972.tb01295.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helson, R. (1965). Childhood interest clusters related to creativity in women. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 352–361. doi:10.1037/h0022401
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191–196. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.2.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, E., & Milgram, R. M. (1991). Original thinking in preschool children: A validation of ideational fluency measures. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 253–260. doi:10.1080/10400419109534397
   Google Scholar
• Khandwalla, P. N. (1993). An exploratory investigation of divergent thinking through protocol analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 241–259. doi:10.1080/10400419309534481
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2006). Is creativity unidimensional or multidimensional? Analyses of the torrance tests of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 251–259. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2008). Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 106–130. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–629. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan, N., & Pankove, E. (1972). Creative ability over a five year span. Child Development, 43, 427–442. doi:10.2307/1127546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, B. P., & Hoff, E. (2006). Person-centered and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 377–389. doi:10.1353/mpq.2006.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21–39. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumsdaine, M., & Lumsdaine, E. (1995). Thinking preferences of engineering students: Implications for curriculum restructuring. Journal of Engineering Education, 84, 193–204. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)2168-9830
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, D. (2003). The person approach: Concepts, measurement models, and research strategy. In S. C. Peck, & R. W. Roeser (Eds.), New directions for Child and Adolescent development. Person-centered approaches to studying development in context (No. 101, pp. 3–23). San San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. S. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person- and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 191–225. doi:10.1080/10705510902751010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, R. M., & Milgram, N. A. (1976). Creative thinking and creative performance in Israeli students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 255–259. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.68.3.255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27–43. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paek, S. H., Park, H., Runco, M. A., & Choe, H. S. (2016). The contribution of ideational behavior to creative extracurricular activities. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 144–148. doi:10.1080/10400419.2016.1162547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paek, S. H., & Runco, M. A. (2017). Dealing with the criterion problem by measuring the quality and quantity of creative activity and accomplishment. Creativity Research Journal, 29, 167–173. doi:10.1080/10400419.2017.1304078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastor, D. A., Barron, K. E., Miller, B. J., & Davis, S. L. (2007). A latent profile analysis of college students’ achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 8–47. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesut, D. J. (1990). Creative thinking as a self-regulatory metacognitive process - A model for education, training and further research. Journal of Creative Behavior, 24, 105–110. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1990.tb00532.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1202_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., Qian, M., & Wang, S. (2011). Is originality in the eye of the beholder? Comparison of scoring techniques in the assessment of divergent thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45, 1–22. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01081.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1986a). Divergent thinking and creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 375–384. doi:10.1177/001316448604600211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1986b). The discriminant validity of gifted children’s divergent thinking test scores. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 78–82. doi:10.1177/001698628603000207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1986c). Flexibility and originality in children’s divergent thinking. Journal of Psychology, 120, 345–352. doi:10.1080/00223980.1986.9712632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (in press). Divergent thinking. In R. J. Sternberg and J. Kaufman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Abdulla, A. M., Paek, S. H., Al-Jasim, F. A., & Alsuwaidi, H. N. (2016). Which test of divergent thinking is best? Creativity. Theories–Research-Applications, 3, 4–18. doi:10.1515/ctra-2016-0001
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 483–501. doi:10.1177/001316448504500306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Johnson, D. J., & Bear, P. K. (1993). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity. Child Study Journal, 23, 91–113.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2010). Torrance tests of creative thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty-year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 361–368. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.523393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1991). The instructional enhancement of the flexibility and originality scores of divergent thinking tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 435–441. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2000-2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393–400. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Walczyk, J. J., Acar, S., Cowger, E. L., Simundson, M., & Tripp, S. (2013). The incremental validity of a short form of the ideational behavior scale and usefulness of distractor, contraindicative, and lie scales. Journal of Creative Behavior, 48, 185–197. doi:10.1002/jocb.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, L. C. (1999). Teachers’ biases toward creative children. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 321–328. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1204_10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, G. M. (1983). The measurement and properties of divergent thinking ability as a single compound entity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 393–402. doi:10.1111/jedm.1983.20.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, S. (2016). Applying the mixed rasch model to the runco ideational behavior scale. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 426–434. doi:10.1080/10400419.2016.1229985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 151–158. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2007). Creativity: Specialized expertise or general cognitive processes? In M. J. Roberts (Ed.), Integrating the mind: Domain general versus domain specific processes in higher cognition (pp. 351–367). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677–688. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, A. (2000). A review on the study of creativity in Singapore. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 259–284. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01215.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1980). Growing up creatively gifted: A 22-year longitudinal study. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 5, 148–158, 170.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1981). Empirical validation of criterion-referenced indicators of creative ability through a longitudinal study. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 6, 136–140.
   Google Scholar
• Truhon, S. A. (1983). Playfulness, play, and creativity: A path analytic model. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 143, 19–28. doi:10.1080/00221325.1983.10533529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars, & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 89–106). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Stumm, S., Chung, A., & Furnham, A. (2011). Creative ability, creative ideation and latent classes of creative achievement: What is the role of personality? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 107–114. doi:10.1037/a0020499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity–Intelligence distinction. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, M. A., & Wing, C. W. (1969). The talented student. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23, 24–37. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.545713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar