Educational Science Students’ Implicit Theories of Creativity

References

• Andiliou, A., & Murphy, P. K. (2010). Examining variations among researchers’ and teachers’ conceptualizations of creativity: A review and synthesis of contemporary research. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 201–219. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleakley, A. (2004). ‘Your creativity or mine?’: A typology of creativities in higher education and the value of a pluralistic approach. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(4), 463–475. doi:10.1080/1356251042000252390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D. W., & Chan, L. K. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers’ perceptions of students’ characteristics in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 185–195. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1203_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a system perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2015). The European Higher Education Area in 2015: Bologna Process Implementation Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Faculty of Philosophy (2016). Vesti [News]. Retrieved Decembre 23, 2016, from University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy Web site: http://www.f.bg.ac.rs/buduci_studenti/vestiBS
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, H. D., & Benjamin, A. (2006). Creativity and education: An American retrospective. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 319–336.
   Google Scholar
• Fleith, D. S. (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22(3), 148–153. doi:10.1080/02783190009554022
   Google Scholar
• Fryer, M., & Collings, J. R. (1991). British teachers’ views of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 75–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of mind: A theory of multiple intelligences. London, UK: Paladin.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. (2010). Points of departure, the ‘art’ of creative teaching: Implications for higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 607–613. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.493349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28(1), 79–93. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81. doi:10.1037/a0029528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampylis, P., Berki, E., & Saariluama, P. (2009). In-service and prospective teachers’ conceptions of creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(1), 15–29. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2008.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kankaraš, M. (2009). Implicitne teorije kreativnosti: Kros-kulturna studija [Implicit theories of creativity: Cross-cultural study]. Psihologija, 42(2), 187–202. doi:10.2298/PSI0902187K
   Google Scholar
• Kovač Šebart, M., & Krek, J. (2012). Vzgojna zasnova javne šole [Foundations of up-bringing in public schools]. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Center za študij edukacijskih strategij, Pedagoška fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani.
   Google Scholar
• Maksić, S. (2002). The relevance of curriculum research: The evaluation of curriculum-making processes. In M. Rosenmund, A. V. Fries, & W. Heller (Eds.), Comparing Curriculum - Making Processes (pp. 231–242). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Maksić, S., & Pavlović, J. (2009). Ekspertski model za podsticanje kreativnosti u školi [An expert model for fostering creativity in schools]. In Đ. Komlenović, D. Malinić, & S. Gašić Pavišić (Eds.), Kvalitet i efikasnost nastave (pp. 281–293). Beograd, Serbia: Institut za pedagoška istraživanja & Volgogradski državni pedagoški univerzitet.
   Google Scholar
• Maksić, S., & Pavlović, J. (2011). Educational researchers’ personal explicit theories of creativity and its development: A qualitative study. High Ability Studies, 22(2), 219–231. doi:10.1080/13598139.2011.628850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maksić, S., & Pavlović, J. (2015). Srednja škola kao kontekst za ispoljavanje i razvoja kreativnosti [Secondary school as a context for expressing and developing creativity]. Nastava i vaspitanje, 64(1), 71–85. doi:10.5937/nasvas1501071M
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. (2009). Criteria of good classroom instruction: Empirical findings and didactic advice. In Đ. Komlenović, D. Malinić, & S. Gašić Pavišić (Eds.), Kvalitet i efikasnost nastave (pp. 13–34). Beograd, Serbia: Institut za pedagoška istraživanja & Volgogradski državni pedagoški univerzitet..
   Google Scholar
• Mullet, D. R., Willerson, A., Lamb, N., & Kettler, T. (2016). Examining teacher perceptions of creativity: A systematic review of the literature. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 9–30. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paletz, S. B. F., & Peng, K. (2008). Implicit theories of creativity across cultures: Novelty and appropriateness in two product domains. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(3), 286–302. doi:10.1177/0022022108315112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlović, J., & Džinović, V. (2007). Fokus grupe: Od prikupljanja podataka do kritičke pedagoške prakse [Focus groups: From collecting data to critical pedagogical practice]. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoška istraživanja, 39(2), 289–308. doi:10.2298/ZIPI0702289P
   Google Scholar
• Pavlović, J., & Maksić, S. (2014). Implicitne teorije kreativnosti nastavnika osnovne škole: Studija slučaja [Primary school teachers’ implicit theories of creativity: A case study]. Psihologija, 47(4), 465–483. doi:10.2298/PSI1404465P
   Google Scholar
• Pavlović, J., Maksić, S., & Bodroža, B. (2013). Implicit Individualism in Teachers’ Theories of Creativity: Through the “Four P’s” Looking Glass. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 23(1), 39–57.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudowicz, E., Tokarz, A., & Beauvale, A. (2009). The desirability of personal characteristics associated with creativity: Through the eyes of Polish and Chinese university students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(2), 104–115. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2009.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. (1999). Implicit theories. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 2–30). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Johnson, D. (2002). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 427–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Johnson, D., & Bear, P. K. (1993). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity. Child Study Journal, 23(2), 91–113.
   Google Scholar
• Seng, Q. K., Keung, H. K., & Cheng, S. K. (2008). Implicit theories of creativity: A comparison of student-teachers in Hong Kong and Singapore. Compare, 38(1), 71–86. doi:10.1080/03057920701419959
   Google Scholar
• Skubic Ermenc, K., Živković Vujisić, N., & Spasenović, V. (2015). Theory, Practice and Competences in the Study of Pedagogy – Views of Ljubljana and Belgrade University Teachers. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(2), 35–55.
   Google Scholar
• Spasenović, V., Vujisić Živković, N., & Skubic Ermenc, K. (2012). The Role of Comparative Pedagogy in the Training of Pedagogues in Serbia and Slovenia. In N. Popov, C. Wolhuter, B. Leutwyler, G. Hilton, J. Ogunleye, & P. Almeida (Eds.), International Perspectives on Education, BCES Conference Books (pp. 36–42). Sofia, Bulgaria: Bulgarian Comparative Education Society.
   Google Scholar
• Spiel, C., & Korff, C. (1998). Implicit theories of creativity: The conceptions of politicians, scientists, artists and school teachers. High Ability Studies, 9(1), 43–59.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 125–147). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, E., Anders, K., Hancock, S., & Elvidge, L. (2013). Reclaiming creativity in the era of impact: Exploring ideas about creative research in science and engineering. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1259–1273. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.620091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakon o osnovama sistema obrazovanja i vaspitanja [Law on the Basis of the Education System]. (2009). Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, No. 72/09. Beograd (Serbia): Službeni glasnik.
   Google Scholar