Early Childhood Teachers’ Perception of Creative Personality as a Predictor of Their Support of pedagogy important for fostering Creativity: A Chinese Perspective

REFERENCES

• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R.C., Thier, M., & Pitts, C. (2017). Interpersonal and intrapersonal assessment alternatives: Self-reports, situational judgment tests, and discrete choice experiments. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 47–60.
   Google Scholar
• Batey, M., Furnham, A., & Safiullina, X. (2010). Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 532–535. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1996). Learning, schooling, and socialization: A Chinese solution to a Western problem. In S. Lau (Ed.), Growing up the Chinese way: Chinese child and adolescent development (pp. 147–167). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, M. H. (1991). Beyond the Chinese face: Insights from psychology. Hong Kong; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K. L., & Chan, C. L. W. (2005). Chinese culture, social work education and research. International Social Work, 48(4), 381–389. doi:10.1177/0020872805053461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, F., Leung, K., Zhang, J. X., Sun, H., & Gan, Y. Q. (2001). Indigenous Chinese personality constructs: Is the five-factor model complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(4), 407–433. doi:10.1177/0022022101032004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, H. P. R., & Leung, C. H. (2013). Preschool teachers’ beliefs of creative Pedagogy: Important for fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(4), 397–407. doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.843334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, H. P. R., & Leung, C. H. (2014). Preschool teachers’ perceptions of creative personality important for fostering creativity: Hong Kong perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 78–89. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremin, T., Burnard, P., & Craft, A. (2006). Pedagogy and possibility thinking in the early years. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(2), 108–119. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2006.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dineen, R., & Niu, W. (2008). The effectiveness of Western creative teaching methods in China: An action research project. Psychology, Aesthetics, Creativity & Arts, 2(1), 42–52. doi:10.1037/1931-3896.2.1.42
   Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao, M., & Lin, Q. (2013). Personality traits of effective teachers represented in the narratives of American and Chinese preservice teachers: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(2), 84–95.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, K. A., & Plucker, J. (2014). Teacher use of creativity-enhancing activities in Chinese and American elementary classrooms. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 389–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, M., & Kang, N. (2010). South Korean and the US secondary school science teachers’ conceptions of creativity and teaching for creativity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education., 8(5), 821–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng, J. S., Hong, J. C., ChanLin, L. J., Chang, S. H., & Chu, H. C. (2005). Creative teachers and creative teaching strategies. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(4), 352–358. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00445.x
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, D. J., Furnham, A., & Batey, M. (2013). The structure and personality predictors of self-rated creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 76–84. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2011). Intelligence and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 771–783). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57–66. doi:10.4219/jsge-2005-473
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., Cramond, B., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2010). The relationship between creativity and intelligence. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 395–412). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kulinna, P. H., & Cothran, D. J. (2003). Physical education teachers’ self-reported use and perceptions of various teaching styles. Learning and Instruction, 13, 597–603. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00044-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. R., & Kemple, K. (2014). Preservice teachers’ personality traits and engagement in creative activities as predictors of their support for children’s creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 82–94. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.873668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. S. (2012). Adopting creative pedagogy into Asian classrooms? – Case studies of primary school teachers’ responses and dilemma. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 205–216. doi:10.5539/jel.v1n2p205
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, M., & Plucker, J. A. (2010). A model of Chinese adolescents’ creative personality. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 62–67. doi:10.1080/10400410903579585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci, F., Rokach, L., & Shapira, B. (2015). Introduction to recommender systems handbook. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, & P. B. Kantor (Eds.), Recommender systems handbook (pp. 1–35). New York: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Rudowicz, E. (2003). Creativity and culture: A two way interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 273–290. doi:10.1080/00313830308602
   Google Scholar
• Rudowicz, E., Tokarz, A., & Beauvale, A. (2009). Desirability of personal characteristics associated with creativity: Through the eyes of Polish and Chinese university students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(2), 104–115. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2009.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2008). Creativity and education. New Horizons in Education, 56(1), 107–115.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2nd ed.). Burlington: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66–75. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, A. G. (2001). Singaporean teachers’ perception of activities useful for fostering creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(2), 131–148. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. doi:10.1007/BF02291170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (2007). Do personality traits make a difference in teaching styles among Chinese high school teachers? Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 669–679. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar