Creativity through Connectedness: The Role of Closeness and Perspective Taking in Group Creativity

REFERENCES

• Alhusaini, A. A., Maker, J. C., & Deil-Amen, R. (2014). What is creativity: Teachers’ beliefs about creativity in students’ written stories. Zbornik Instituta Za Pedagoska Istrazivanja, 46(1), 162–180. doi:10.2298/ZIPI1401162A
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1982). A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E. N., Vallone, R. D., & Bator, R. J. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 363–377. doi:10.1177/0146167297234003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, J., & McKool, S. S. (2009). Assessing creativity using the consensual assessment technique. In S. Schreiner (Ed.), Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods and applications in higher education (pp. 65–77). Hershey, PA: Information Science.
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., Sager, K., Garst, E., Kang, M., Rubchinsky, K., & Dawson, K. (1997). Is empathy-induced helping due to self–Other merging? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 495–509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtoldt, M. N., De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & Choi, H. S. (2010). Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 622–637. doi:10.1037/a0019386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (1998). Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 355–373. doi:10.1177/109442819814001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, G., Gneezy, U., & Nagel, R. (2002). The effect of intergroup competition on group coordination: An experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior, 41(1), 1–25. doi:10.1016/S0899-8256(02)00012-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunch, B. J., Lund, N. L., & Wiggins, F. K. (1983). Self-disclosure and perceived closeness in the development of group process. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 8(2), 59–66. doi:10.1080/01933928308411733
   Google Scholar
• Chatman, J. A., & Flynn, F. J. (2001). The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 956–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., & Bliese, P. D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self-and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 549–556. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy–Altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 481. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457–475. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozby, P. (1972). Self-disclosure, reciprocity and liking. Sociometry, 35, 151–160. doi:10.2307/2786555
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Craig, T. Y., & Kelly, J. R. (1999). Group cohesiveness and creative performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(4), 243–256. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.3.4.243
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Sawyer, K. (1995). Creative insight: The social dimension of a solitary moment. In R. Steinberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of insight (pp. 329–361). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., & Luce, C. (1996). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 713–726. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K., & Carnevale, P. J. (2003). Motivational bases of information processing and strategy in conflict and negotiation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 235–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K., Nijstad, B. A., Bechtoldt, M. N., & Baas, M. (2011). Group creativity and innovation: A motivated information processing perspective. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 81–89. doi:10.1037/a0017986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 22–49. doi:10.1177/1088868307304092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, F. G., Johnson, M. E., & Fortman, J. B. (1989). Task-focused self-disclosure: Effects on group cohesiveness, commitment to task, and productivity. Small Group Behavior, 20(1), 87–96. doi:10.1177/104649648902000107
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C., & Kraimer, M. L. (2006). Justice and leader-member exchange: The moderating role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 395–406. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20786086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, D. R., & Johnson, D. W. (1977). The effects of perspective-taking and egocentrism on problem solving in heterogeneous and homogeneous groups. The Journal of Social Psychology, 102, 63–72. doi:10.1080/00224545.1977.9713241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraley, B., & Aron, A. (2004). The effect of a shared humorous experience on closeness in initial encounters. Personal Relationships, 11(1), 61–78. doi:10.1111/pere.2004.11.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., & Ku, G. (2004). The effects of perspective-taking on prejudice: The moderating role of self-evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(5), 594–604. doi:10.1177/0146167203262802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., Ku, G., & Wang, C. S. (2005). Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(2), 109–124. doi:10.1177/1368430205051060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 708–724. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.59215085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gummerum, M., Leman, P. J., & Hollins, T. S. (2014). How do children share information in groups? Developmental Psychology, 50(8), 2105–2114. doi:10.1037/a0037144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). Story-telling: A method for assessing children’s creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 22(4), 235–246. doi:10.1002/jocb.1988.22.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, S. D., Sharp, C. A., Gibson, N. J., & Tipsord, J. M. (2013). Nearer my God to thee: Self–God overlap and believers’ relationships with God. Self and Identity, 12(3), 337–356. doi:10.1080/15298868.2012.674212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoever, I. J., Van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W. P., & Barkema, H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 982–996. doi:10.1037/a0029159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, D. A., & Jones, L. M. (2005). Leadership, collective personality, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 509–522. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145. doi:10.1037/a0015978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). Rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306–309. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Oxford, UK: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Jaussi, K. S., & Dionne, S. D. (2003). Leading for creativity: The role of unconventional leader behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 475–498. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00048-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, P. J., & Lawrence, S. A. (2009). Emotional intelligence in teams: Development and initial validation of the short version of the Workgroup Emotional Intelligence Profile (WEIP-S). Journal of Management & Organization, 15(4), 452–469. doi:10.1017/S1833367200002546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshner, B. J., Dies, R. R., & Brown, R. A. (1978). Effects of experimental manipulation of self-disclosure on group cohesiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(6), 1171–1177. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.46.6.1171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 211–236. doi:10.1177/109442810033001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, G., Wang, C. S., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). The promise and perversity of perspective taking in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 79–102. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2015.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, R., Miell, D., & Morgan, L. (2000). Social processes and creative collaboration in children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(4), 405–415. doi:10.1007/BF03172984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohrman, S. A., Gibson, C. B., & Mohrman, A. M. (2001). Doing research that is useful to practice: A model and empirical exploration. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 357–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between cohesiveness and productivity: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 210–227. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(1), 3–23. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1201_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, M. W., Laurent, S. M., & Hodges, S. D. (2014). Perspective taking instructions and self-other overlap: Different motives for helping. Motivation and Emotion, 38(2), 224–234. doi:10.1007/s11031-013-9377-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijstad, B. A., Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (2003). Cognitive stimulation and interference in idea generating groups. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 137–159). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Atkins, P. W. B., & Axtell, C. M. (2008). Building better work places through individual perspective taking: A fresh look at a fundamental human process. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 23, 149–196.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology, 49(2), 237–262. doi:10.1111/apps.2000.49.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M., & Kohn, N. W. (2012). Collaborative creativity-group creativity and team innovation. In M. D. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 327–357). London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H. C. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 76–87. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, J. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 85–101. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20785503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 89–106. doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgement of the child. London, UK: Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Pople, I. (2014). Creativity and the ownership of English: The teaching and assessment of creative writing with non-native speakers. Porta Lingaurum, 22, 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Roark, A. E., & Sharah, H. S. (1989). Factors related to group cohesiveness. Small Group Research, 20(1), 62–69. doi:10.1177/104649648902000105
   Google Scholar
• Roßnagel, C. (2000). Cognitive load and perspective-taking: Applying the automatic controlled distinction to verbal communication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 429–445. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200005/06)30:3<429::AID-EJSP3>3.0.CO;2-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder, B. (2016, March 19). Team Spirit. The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/business-and-finance/21694962-managing-them-hard-businesses-are-embracing-idea-working-teams
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2011). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reader, G. D., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). The relationship closeness induction task. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 23, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Somech, A. (2006). The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 132–157. doi:10.1177/0149206305277799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S., Treger, S., & Wondra, J. D. (2013). Effects of self-disclosure role on liking, closeness, and other impressions in get-acquainted interactions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(4), 497–514. doi:10.1177/0265407512459033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staw, B. M. (2009). Is group creativity really an oxymoron? Some thoughts on bridging the cohesion–creativity divide. In E. A. Mannix, M. A. Neale, & J. Goncalo Research on managing groups and teams: Creativity in groups (12th ed., pp. 311–323). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 585–600. doi:10.1177/0146167201275007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, Y., Shaw, A., & Fishbach, A. (2016). The friendly taking effect: How interpersonal closeness leads to seemingly selfish yet jointly maximizing choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 669–687. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucv052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(3), 355–387. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 680–693. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A., & Wallace, M. (1991). Innovation in health care teams. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21(4), 303–315. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woehr, D. J., Loignon, A. C., Schmidt, P. B., Loughry, M. L., & Ohland, M. W. (2015). Justifying aggregation with consensus-based constructs : A review and examination of cutoff values for common aggregation indices. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 704–737. doi:10.1177/1094428115582090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. B., Pescosolido, A. T., & Druskat, V. U. (2002). Emotional intelligence as the basis of leadership emergence in self-managing teams. Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 505–522. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00141-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321. doi:10.5465/amr.1993.3997517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y. Q., Gardner, D. G., & Chen, H. G. (2016). Relationships between work team climate, individual motivation, and creativity. Journal of Management, 44(5), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziebro, M., & Northcraft, G. (2009). Connecting the dots: Network development, information flow, and creativity in groups. In E. A. Mannix, M. A. Neale, & J. A. Goncalo (Eds.), Creativity in groups research on managing groups and teams, no. 12 (pp. 135–162). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
   Google Scholar