Managers’ Intention to Innovate in a Change Context: Examining the Role of Attitudes, Control and Support

REFERENCES

• Ajzen, I. (2012). Martin Fishbein’s legacy: The reasoned action approach. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 640(1), 11–27. doi:10.1177/0002716211423363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. doi:10.2307/256995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amado, G., Faucheux, C., & Laurent, A. (1991). Organizational change and cultural realities: Franco-american contrasts. International Studies of Management & Organization, 21(3), 62–95. doi:10.1080/00208825.1991.11656562
   Google Scholar
• Basadur, M. (1995). Optimal ideation-evaluation ratios. Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), 63–75. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj0801_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M. (2004). Leading others to think innovatively together: Creative leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 103–121. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., & Finkneiner, C. T. (1985). Measuring preference for ideation in creative problem-solving training. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21(1), 37–49. doi:10.1177/002188638502100104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., Graen, G. B., & Green, S. G. (1982). Training in creative problem solving: Effects on ideation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 41–70. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(82)90233-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., & Hausdorf, P. A. (1996). Measuring divergent thinking attitudes related to creative problem solving and innovation management. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 21–32. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj0901_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., Runco, M. A., & Vega, L. A. (2000). Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes and behaviors work together: A causal process model. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(2), 77–100. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., Taggar, S., & Pringle, P. (1999). Improving the measurement of divergent thinking attitudes in organizations. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33(2), 75–111. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1999.tb01040.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., Wakabayashi, M., & Graen, G. B. (1990). Individual problem-solving styles and attitudes toward divergent thinking before and after training. Creativity Research Journal, 3(1), 22–32. doi:10.1080/10400419009534331
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B. S., Lee, S., & Yeung, S. K. (2011). Employees’ attitudes toward organizational change: A literature review. Human Resource Management, 50(4), 479–500. doi:10.1002/hrm.20434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825–845. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.34421969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, D. R. (1998). Understanding, measuring, and enhancing individual creative problem-solving efforts. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 123–150. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation model (Vol. 154, pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Caroff, X., Massu, J., Krasteva, A., & Houssin, M. (2015). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation : Validation of a taxonomy. 17th Congress of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology (EAWOP), Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance: The mediating role of psychological processes. Creativity Research Journal, 16(2–3), 187–199. doi:10.1080/10400419.2004.9651452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloutier, C., & Leroux, Y. (1998). Prédiction de l’intention créatrice à l’aide du modèle du comportement plainifié d’Ajzen. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 30(3), 182–192. doi:10.1037/h0087061
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391–404. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2011). Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Management and Organization Review, 8(2), 423–454. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00233.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, R. L., & Johnson, D. C. (1989). Varying relationships between adaption-innovation and social desirability. Psychological Reports, 65(3_suppl2), 1151–1154. doi:10.2466/pr0.1989.65.3f.1151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, T. S., & Webster, R. L. (1998). IS managers’ innovation toward telecommuting: A structural equation model. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 161–168). IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/HICSS.1998.655271
   Google Scholar
• Ettlie, J. E., & O’Keefe, R. D. (1982). innovative attitudes, values, and intentions in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 163–182. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1982.tb00066.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felstead, A., Jewson, N., & Walters, S. (2003). Managerial control of employees working at home. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(2), 241–264. doi:10.1111/1467-8543.00271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY, US: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. J., Eccles, M. P., Johnston, M., Walker, A., Grimshaw, J., Foy, R., ... Bonetti, D. et al. (2004). Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour. A manual for health services researchers. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle.
   Google Scholar
• Goepel, M., Hölzle, K., & Zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. (2012). Individuals’ innovation response behaviour: A framework of antecedents and opportunities for future research. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(4), 412–426. doi:10.1111/caim.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). The impact of superior-subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 77–88. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenworking. (2012). Le télétravail dans les grandes entreprises françaises. Synthèse remise au ministre charge de l’industrie, de l’énergie et de l’économie numérique. Retrieved from https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/directions_services/cns/ressources/Teletravail_Rapport_du_ministere_de_Mai2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, G. (2006). The why, what, and how of management innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84(2), 72–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Dimensions of creative climate: A general taxonomy. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 15(2), 97–116.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69–90. doi:10.1080/10400410709336883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Institute for Business Value. (2010). Capitalizing on complexity: Insights from the global chief executive officer study. Somers, USA: IBM Global Business Services.
   Google Scholar
• Illegems, V., & Verbeke, A. (2004). Telework: What does it mean for management? Long Range Planning, 37(4), 319–334. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2004.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. (1983). The change masters: Innovation for productivity in the American corporation. New York, NY, US: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R., Stein, B. A., & Jick, T. D. (1992). Challenge of organizational change: How companies experience it and leaders guide it. New York, NY, US: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (1998). Structural models with observed variables and path analysis: I. Fundamentals, recursive models. In D. A. Kenny (Ed.), Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (pp. 95–152). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunz, J., & Linder, S. (2013). With a view to make things better: Individual characteristics and intentions to engage in management innovation. Journal of Management & Governance, 19(3), 525–556. doi:10.1007/s10997-013-9280-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, K., & Harnish, T. (2009). Undress for success: The naked truth about making money at home. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Mathisen, G. E. (2011). Organizational antecedents of creative self-efficacy. Creativity & Innovation Management, 20(3), 185–195. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00606.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathisen, G. E., & Einarsen, S. (2004). A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 119–140. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1601_12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, A., & Gonzàlez-Morales, M. (2013). Reactions to organizational change: An integrated model of health predictors, intervening variables, and outcomes. In S. Oreg, A. Michel, & R. T. By (Eds.), The psychology of organizational change: Viewing change from the employee’s perspective (pp. 65–92). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2009). The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1269–1280. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musa, M., BrčIć, I., & Hladnik, H. (2002). Croatian management in teleworking environment. 25th International Conference-Electronic Commerce, Opatija, Croatia: MIPRO.
   Google Scholar
• Oreg, S., Michel, A., & By, R. (2013). The psychology of organizational change: Viewing change from the employee’s perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., & Peiró, M. (2011). Management of virtual teams in work organizations : Some inputs from research. Papeles Del Psicologo, 32(1), 82–93.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, M. P., Sánchez, A. M., & Carnicer, M. P. D. L. (2003). The organizational implications of human resources managers’ perception of teleworking. Personnel Review, 32(6), 733–755. doi:10.1108/00483480310498693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, P., & Heusinkveld, S. (2010). Institutional explanations for managers’ attitudes towards telehomeworking. Human Relations, 63(1), 107–135. doi:10.1177/0018726709336025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 783–794. doi:10.5465/AMR.2000.3707722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. doi:10.2307/256701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• semTools Contributors. (2016). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.4-14. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/semTools/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Tofighi, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2016). Monte Carlo confidence intervals for complex functions of indirect effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 23(2), 194–205. doi:10.1080/10705511.2015.1057284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volberda, H. W., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Heij, C. V. (2013). Management innovation: Management as fertile ground for innovation. European Management Review, 10(1), 1–15. doi:10.1111/emre.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volberda, H. W., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Mihalache, O. R. (2014). Advancing management innovation: Synthesizing processes, levels of analysis, and change agents. Organization Studies, 35(9), 1245–1264. doi:10.1177/0170840614546155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (1999). Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organization Science, 10(6), 777–790. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.6.777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.49388995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar