866
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Comments and Corrections

Objectively Scoring Divergent Thinking Tests for Originality: A Re-Analysis and Extension

&
Pages 466-468 | Published online: 13 Dec 2018

REFERENCES

  • Acar, S., Runco, M. A., & Park, H. (2018). What should people be told when they take a divergent thinking test? A meta-analytic review of explicit instructions for divergent thinking. Under review.
  • Beketayev, K., & Runco, M. A. (2016). Scoring divergent thinking tests with a semantics-based algorithm. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 210–220. doi:10.5964/ejop.v12i2.1127
  • Dumas, D., & Dunbar, K. N. (2014). Understanding fluency and originality: A latent variable perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 56–67. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2014.09.003
  • Dumas, D., & Dunbar, K. N. (2016). The creative stereotype effect. PLOS ONE, 11(2). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142567
  • Dumas, D., & Strickland, A. (in press). From book to bludgeon: A closer look at malevolent responses on the alternate uses task. Creativity Research Journal.
  • Forthmann, B., Oyebade, O., Ojo, A., Günther, F., & Holling, H. (2018). Application of latent semantic analysis to divergent thinking is biased by elaboration. The Journal of Creative Behavior. doi:10.1002/jocb.240
  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hil1.
  • Hass, R. W. (2017). Semantic search during divergent thinking. Cognition, 166, 344–357. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.039
  • Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 191–196. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.2.191
  • Hudson, L. (1968). Frames of mind: Ability, perception and self-perception in the arts and sciences. Oxford, England: W. W. Norton.
  • Kintsch, W. (2000). Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 257–266. doi:10.3758/BF03212981
  • Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259–284. doi:10.1080/01638539809545028
  • Puryear, J. S., Kettler, T., & Rinn, A. N. (2017). Relationships of personality to differential conceptions of creativity: A systematic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 59–68. doi:10.1037/aca0000079
  • Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Westport, CT, US: Ablex Publishing.
  • Runco, M. A., Abdulla, A. M., & Paek, S.-H. (2016). Which test of divergent thinking is best? Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 3, 4–18. doi:10.1515/ctra-2016-0001
  • Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (in press). Divergent thinking. In J. C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity. NewYork, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 483–501. doi:10.1177/001316448504500306
  • Runco, M. A., Illies, J. J., & Eisenman, R. (2005a). Creativity, originality, and appropriateness: What do explicit instructions tell us about their relationships?. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 137–148. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01255.x
  • Runco, M. A., Illies, J. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2005b). Explicit instructions to be creative and original: A comparison of strategies and criteria as targets with three types of divergent thinking tests. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 15, 5–15.
  • Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
  • Torrance, E. P. (1972). Predictive validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(4), 236–252. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00936.x
  • Torrance, E. P. (1995). Why fly? New York, NY: Greenwood Publishing Group.
  • Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). A new look at the creativity intelligence distinction. Journal of Personality, 33(3), 348–369. doi:10.1111/jopy.1965.33.issue-3

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.